Daria Nikitaeva | Search NASA

NASA NTRS2023

Parametric Modeling of NTP Engine Performance for a Crewed Mars Mission

Nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) has been studied extensively for use on a crewed mission to Mars, and NASA and DARPA are partnering in the development and demonstration of an NTP engine as part of the DRACO project. The specific impulse and thrust achieved by an engine in the context of a mission determines the propellant amount required to close the mission and the size of the vehicle required. An NTP engine has a slower start-up/shut-down transient than traditional chemical engines and requires post-firing cooling, and thus the average Isp for a burn is a function of the power ramp-up rate and the duration of the burn. An initial demonstration engine may target a lower Isp than the 900 sec that has been extensively studied by NASA. This paper shows the effect on the mission closure and vehicle sizing of the transient ramp rate performance and of lower than 900 sec specific impulse. Ammonia is considered as an alternate NTP propellant, with mission performance estimated.

NTP↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Effects of Heat Transfer Coefficient Variation on Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Engine Performance

A physics-based Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) Testing Reference Design (TRD) power balance model was coded in Simulink to investigate engine performance for various design and parameter modifications. Since the primary mode of heat transfer in NTP engines is convective, the convective heat transfer coefficient (HTC) is a key parameter that requires accurate representation. The industry standard Westinghouse correlation has an uncertainty of ±20% which was investigated in this study. The results showed that a 20% decrease in the HTC led to a 4.14% increase in maximum fuel temperature while a 20% decrease in the HTC led to a 1.81% decrease in maximum fuel temperature suggesting that narrowing the uncertainty of this correlation through experimental work would be a critical step in the development of NTP engines. Furthermore, a maximum fuel temperature relationship with specific impulse was developed for the TRD engine which showed potential engine operation between specific impulse values of 715 and 900 seconds with minimal changes to the engine design. This graph could be useful for high level vehicle performance estimations for fuel types with different maximum operating temperatures.

Heat Transfer Coefficient↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reactor Parametric Assessments for Alternative Propellant Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Engines

This work focuses on the implications of alternative working fluids for nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) reactors. To perform this analysis, NASA’s Testing Reference Design (TRD) is altered using parametric studies with selected alternative propellants to determine the reactor modifications required to enable an operable system. This research investigates ammonia, water, methane, helium, and enriched diborane as feasible options to enable a specific impulse (𝐼 𝑠𝑝 ) greater than the chemical propulsion alternatives. Frozen and dissociated 𝐼 𝑠𝑝 for each propellant is shown for variable chamber temperature conditions. Geometrical sensitivities are performed to observe the impact on the neutron multiplication factor (k eff ), system mass, and HALEU loading. Control drum worth curves are included for 5- degree increments of rotation. The base TRD configuration does not enable a critical system for ammonia and enriched diborane, thus these propellants will be highlighted in the final results. Equivalent study results for hydrogen will be included as a point of comparison to the performance of the other options.

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Engine Cycle Comparison for Alternative Propellant Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Engines

A modular Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) engine modeling suite was coded in Simulink to analyze various engine cycle configurations and propellants. This model was validated and used for previous studies involving alternative propellants for NTP engines. The current study compared hydrogen-based NTP (H-NTP) with ammonia-based Alternative propellant NTP (A-NTP) engines with expander and bleed cycle configurations. Based on prior work, the bleed cycle configuration was modified to yield a feasible result. The assumption that was made was that the Testing Reference Design (TRD) reactor will be used for all cases and that the difference in fuel loading fractions will be enough to offset any differences in the neutronics caused by switching the propellant. This work provided and compared propellant state points throughout the cycles as well as the key performance parameters. The conclusion was that bleed cycles for H-NTP engines are advantageous over expander cycles in terms of maximum system pressure, cycle simplicity, and potentially engine mass. Conversely, expander cycles are more advantageous for A-NTP engines according to the same scope of parameters. Future work will analyze reactor designs that are different from the TRD and use neutronics software integrated with the X-NTP model to provide higher fidelity results.

Nuclear↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reactor Parametric Assessments for Alternative Propellant Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Engines

This work focuses on the implications of alternative working fluids for nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) reactors. To perform this analysis, NASA’s Testing Reference Design (TRD) is altered using parametric studies with selected alternative propellants to determine the reactor modifications required to enable an operable system. This research investigates ammonia, water, methane, helium, and enriched diborane as feasible options to enable a specific impulse (Isp) greater than the chemical propulsion alternatives. Frozen and dissociated Isp for each propellant is shown for variable chamber temperature conditions. Geometrical sensitivities are performed to observe the impact on the neutron multiplication factor (keff), system mass, and HALEU loading. Control drum worth curves are included for 5- degree increments of rotation. The base TRD configuration does not enable a critical system for ammonia and enriched diborane, thus these propellants will be highlighted in the final results. Equivalent study results for hydrogen will be included as a point of comparison to the performance of the other options.

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Effects of Varying the Heat Transfer Coefficient on Engine Performance

A physics-based Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) Testing Reference Design (TRD) power balance model was coded in Simulink to investigate engine performance for various design and parameter modifications. Since the primary mode of heat transfer in NTP engines is convective, the convective heat transfer coefficient (HTC) is a key parameter that requires accurate representation. The industry standard Westinghouse correlation has an uncertainty of ±20% which was investigated in this study. The results showed that a 20% decrease in the HTC led to a 4.14% increase in maximum fuel temperature while a 20% decrease in the HTC led to a 1.81% decrease in maximum fuel temperature suggesting that narrowing the uncertainty of this correlation through experimental work would be a critical step in the development of NTP engines. Furthermore, a maximum fuel temperature relationship with specific impulse was developed for the TRD engine which showed potential engine operation between specific impulse values of 715 and 900 seconds with minimal changes to the engine design. This graph could be useful for high level vehicle performance estimations for fuel types with different maximum operating temperatures.

Heat Transfer Coefficient↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mini-Nozzles for Individual Fuel Elements for NTP Systems NETS

The Testing Reference Design (TRD) reactor and engine for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) systems typically use a large single nozzle with regenerative cooling which contributes a significant portion of the engine mass. Furthermore, if a fuel element is damaged or the flow is otherwise compromised, stagnant or backflow is expected which would further damage the reactor and engine. Therefore, the current analysis attempts to solve this potential issue by considering individual, smaller nozzles allocated for each individual fuel element while also neglecting regenerative cooling flow due to lower hoop stresses from the chamber pressure. However, a material that can withstand the chamber temperatures should be considered such as molybdenum or tungsten or a mixture of the two.

Daria Nikitaeva↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coupled Reactor and Engine Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Modeling Methodology

The design and development process of a Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system requires extensive multiphysics modeling to couple the neutron physics and thermal feedback effects to determine the reactor’s power shape. Propulsion system performance codes utilize this power shape to determine NTP key performance parameters. While the power shape is heavily dependent on the temperature profile and geometry of the reactor, many analyses either assume a constant power shape, or use neutronics analysis to determine a power shape for a specific reactor configuration. The development of a coupling interface for a propulsion system performance code and a Monte Carlo neutron transport code (OpenMC) allows for the reactor power shape to be calculated in a Picard iteration.

Jacob Stonehill↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Key Performance Parameters for an Operational CIS-Lunar NTP Vehicle

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) is in active development by NASA and DARPA. This paper presents an investigation into the effects of different values of key performance parameters (KPPs) of an NTP engine in the context of payload delivery missions between Earth and Lunar orbits. The high Isp afforded by NTP combined with the relatively large engine mass is best applied to missions where the payload mass is large and required ΔV high. Two missions considered are the round-trip Earth to Moon tug and a NRHO to low Lunar orbit tug. Chemical propulsion vehicles can generally achieve higher propellant mass fractions, similar payload mass and similar ΔV performance on these missions. When re-use of the vehicle is considered, the reduced propellant mass required by an NTP vehicle begins to add up over multiple refilling launches and trades more favorably. Analysis illustrates the impact of variation in NTP engine performance values, especially Isp, engine mass and thrust, on performance and the comparison to chemical propulsion. NTP transient and cooldown effects on the vehicle performance are examined. A variety of launch vehicles and hydrogen and ammonia NTP propellants are included in the analyses, and cryogenic fluid management system effects are accounted for.

NTP↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coupled Reactor and Engine Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Modeling Methodology

The design and development process of a Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system requires extensive multiphysics modeling to couple the neutron physics and thermal feedback effects to determine the reactor’s power shape. Propulsion system performance codes utilize this power shape to determine NTP key performance parameters. While the power shape is heavily dependent on the temperature profile and geometry of the reactor, many analyses either assume a constant power shape, or use neutronics analysis to determine a power shape for a specific reactor configuration. The development of a coupling interface for a propulsion system performance code and a Monte Carlo neutron transport code (OpenMC) allows for the reactor power shape to be calculated in an iteration loop. The interface utilizes a file share system to transfer geometry dimensions, temperatures, and material identifiers to OpenMC, which is used to perform a neutron transport simulation of a design like the government Testing Reference Design reactor. The interface is then able to post-process the results from OpenMC and use the same file share system to share a power shape and other important neutron transport parameters to the system performance code. Initial results show that neglecting the changes to power shape when comparing reactor configurations can yield inaccurate results. Furthermore, utilizing propellants other than hydrogen gas can cause significant changes to the power shape, and thus, the thermal performance of a specific reactor design. This methodology is being expanded to allow for multiple families of NTP reactors to be analyzed, including block moderator, particle bed, and NERVA-derived reactors.

multiphysics coupling↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coupled Reactor and Engine Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Modeling Methodology

The design and development process of a Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system requires extensive multiphysics modeling to couple the neutron physics and thermal feedback effects to determine the reactor’s power shape. Propulsion system performance codes utilize this power shape to determine NTP key performance parameters. While the power shape is heavily dependent on the temperature profile and geometry of the reactor, many analyses either assume a constant power shape, or use neutronics analysis to determine a power shape for a specific reactor configuration. The development of a coupling interface for a propulsion system performance code and a Monte Carlo neutron transport code (OpenMC) allows for the reactor power shape to be calculated in an iteration loop. The interface utilizes a file share system to transfer geometry dimensions, temperatures, and material identifiers to OpenMC, which is used to perform a neutron transport simulation of a design like the government Testing Reference Design reactor. The interface is then able to post-process the results from OpenMC and use the same file share system to share a power shape and other important neutron transport parameters to the system performance code. Initial results show that neglecting the changes to power shape when comparing reactor configurations can yield inaccurate results. Furthermore, utilizing propellants other than hydrogen gas can cause significant changes to the power shape, and thus, the thermal performance of a specific reactor design. This methodology is being expanded to allow for multiple families of NTP reactors to be analyzed, including block moderator, particle bed, and NERVA-derived reactors.

multiphysics coupling↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Effect of Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Engine Thrust and Isp Tradeoffs and Alternate Propellants on ΔV Budget and Architecture Mass for Crewed Mars Vehicles

This paper will provide an overview of a spacecraft architecture model developed at AMA as well as an insight into some of the results provided. Currently, preliminary analysis has been completed with this model on evaluating different thrust to weight ratios of Nuclear Thermal Propulsion based vehicles using hydrogen as the propellant by altering the number of engines in the engine block. Gravity losses are incorporated into this analysis as different thrust to weight ratios will provide different burn times. So far, this analysis has shown that in terms of the vehicle mass, it is best to trade the gravity losses for lower vehicle mass as the engines considered add significant dry mass to the vehicle. The final version of this paper will compare gravity losses and vehicle masses for vehicles using different engine masses as well as the ammonia propellant.

Master equipment list↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NTP Demonstration Vehicles and Mission Concepts for Generation 1

Nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) maintains continued interest in support of NASA’s goal to produce a human rated spacecraft for Mars exploration. The NASA/DARPA DRACO effort aims to demonstrate the first nuclear thermal rocket through a flight in 2027. This paper considers the option of a follow-on in-space demonstration supported by a more extensive pre-flight ground test campaign. A concept of operations to accomplish the objectives is outlined and figures of merit for selection of a spacecraft concept are defined. Conceptual designs of various nuclear thermal propulsion demonstration vehicles are presented, spanning a wide trade space. Each concept differently balances performance capability and extensibility to operational missions with schedule, risk, cost of the ground and flight demonstration. Key attributes of notable concepts are provided, with these demonstrating the degree to which each concept can accomplish the objectives considered.

NTP↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Effect of Engine Thrust and Isp Tradeoffs and Alternate Propellants on ΔV Budget and Architecture Mass for 1st Generation Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Flight Test Systems

Following the first Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system test, also known as DRACO, the next NTP system to be developed would be the 1st Generation NTP system. An analysis was conducted to determine the performance of different vehicle configurations utilizing hydrogen (H-NTP), ammonia (A-NTP), and methane (M-NTP) as propellants launched onboard commercial launch vehicles. This was enabled by a quasi-steady-state power balance engine model and vehicle component physics that sized the vehicle system using Master Equipment List (MEL) parameters. The analysis considered configuration cases outlined by a matrix of different mission classes and vehicle configurations that covered the design space of the 1st Generation NTP system to explore various propellant options, engine architectures, and mission scopes. Four mission classes were evaluated which included single burn missions performing maneuvers having a ΔV of 1 km/s and 2.5 km/s followed by 2-burn and 4-burn missions that aimed to exhaust the launch vehicles volume or mass limitations. In all cases, the NTP systems with the lowest thrust class had the longest burn time of which A-NTP and M-NTP systems provided the longest and shortest burn times depending on the launch vehicle used while H-NTP systems tended to cluster together in the middle. Longer burn times could be useful as a testing platform to increase the time for data accumulation. Across the multi-burn cases, H-NTP systems were found to be volume limited while A-NTP and M-NTP systems were mass limited. Both single burn missions showed that A-NTP configurations provided the lowest dry mass given that ammonia had the highest density with comparable performance to M-NTP systems and no requirement for cryocoolers. The results showed that beyond the propellant selection type, the launch vehicle selection, which included Starship, New Glenn, Vulcan, Falcon 9 (recoverable), and Falcon Heavy (recoverable), was a primary driving factor in the test vehicle’s capabilities. Trends were determined based on a set of dimensionless parameters that included the mass ratio of inert mass to initial wetted mass, ratio of specific impulse to burn time, and a dimensionless engine parameter (ratio of impulse to engine momentum). These relationships found the “knees-in-the-curves” that could be a significant point of reference for the designer as they indicate a change in the trend which is located at a specific impulse to burn time ratio of 1, a mass ratio of 0.6, and an engine performance parameter of 4. This study did not attempt to make a recommendation rather provide the tools for the reader to select their own configuration based on their needs.

Propellant↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Effect of Engine Thrust and Isp Tradeoffs and Alternate Propellants on ΔV Budget and Architecture Mass for 1st Generation Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Flight Test Systems

Following the first Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system test, also known as DRACO, the next NTP system to be developed would be the 1st Generation NTP system. An analysis was conducted to determine the performance of different vehicle configurations utilizing hydrogen (H-NTP), ammonia (A-NTP), and methane (M-NTP) as propellants launched onboard commercial launch vehicles. This was enabled by a quasi-steady-state power balance engine model and vehicle component physics that sized the vehicle system using Master Equipment List (MEL) parameters. The analysis considered configuration cases outlined by a matrix of different mission classes and vehicle configurations that covered the design space of the 1st Generation NTP system to explore various propellant options, engine architectures, and mission scopes. Four mission classes were evaluated which included single burn missions performing maneuvers having a ΔV of 1 km/s and 2.5 km/s followed by 2-burn and 4-burn missions that aimed to exhaust the launch vehicles volume or mass limitations. In all cases, the NTP systems with the lowest thrust class had the longest burn time of which A-NTP and M-NTP systems provided the longest and shortest burn times depending on the launch vehicle used while H-NTP systems tended to cluster together in the middle. Longer burn times could be useful as a testing platform to increase the time for data accumulation. Across the multi-burn cases, H-NTP systems were found to be volume limited while A-NTP and M-NTP systems were mass limited. Both single burn missions showed that A-NTP configurations provided the lowest dry mass given that ammonia had the highest density with comparable performance to M-NTP systems and no requirement for cryocoolers. The results showed that beyond the propellant selection type, the launch vehicle selection, which included Starship, New Glenn, Vulcan, Falcon 9 (recoverable), and Falcon Heavy (recoverable), was a primary driving factor in the test vehicle’s capabilities. Trends were determined based on a set of dimensionless parameters that included the mass ratio of inert mass to initial wetted mass, ratio of specific impulse to burn time, and a dimensionless engine parameter (ratio of impulse to engine momentum). These relationships found the “knees-in-the-curves” that could be a significant point of reference for the designer as they indicate a change in the trend which is located at a specific impulse to burn time ratio of 1, a mass ratio of 0.6, and an engine performance parameter of 4. This study did not attempt to make a recommendation rather provide the tools for the reader to select their own configuration based on their needs.

Propellant↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Effect of Engine Thrust and Isp Tradeoffs and Alternate Propellants on ΔV Budget and Architecture Mass for 1st Generation Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Flight Test Systems

Following the first Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system test, also known as DRACO, the next NTP system to be developed would be the 1st Generation NTP system. An analysis was conducted to determine the performance of different vehicle configurations utilizing hydrogen (H-NTP), ammonia (A-NTP), and methane (M-NTP) as propellants launched onboard commercial launch vehicles. This was enabled by a quasi-steady-state power balance engine model and vehicle component physics that sized the vehicle system using Master Equipment List (MEL) parameters. The analysis considered configuration cases outlined by a matrix of different mission classes and vehicle configurations that covered the design space of the 1st Generation NTP system to explore various propellant options, engine architectures, and mission scopes. Four mission classes were evaluated which included single burn missions performing maneuvers having a ΔV of 1 km/s and 2.5 km/s followed by 2-burn and 4-burn missions that aimed to exhaust the launch vehicles volume or mass limitations. In all cases, the NTP systems with the lowest thrust class had the longest burn time of which A-NTP and M-NTP systems provided the longest and shortest burn times depending on the launch vehicle used while H-NTP systems tended to cluster together in the middle. Longer burn times could be useful as a testing platform to increase the time for data accumulation. Across the multi-burn cases, H-NTP systems were found to be volume limited while A-NTP and M-NTP systems were mass limited. Both single burn missions showed that A-NTP configurations provided the lowest dry mass given that ammonia had the highest density with comparable performance to M-NTP systems and no requirement for cryocoolers. The results showed that beyond the propellant selection type, the launch vehicle selection, which included Starship, New Glenn, Vulcan, Falcon 9 (recoverable), and Falcon Heavy (recoverable), was a primary driving factor in the test vehicle’s capabilities. Trends were determined based on a set of dimensionless parameters that included the mass ratio of inert mass to initial wetted mass, ratio of specific impulse to burn time, and a dimensionless engine parameter (ratio of impulse to engine momentum). These relationships found the “knees-in-the-curves” that could be a significant point of reference for the designer as they indicate a change in the trend which is located at a specific impulse to burn time ratio of 1, a mass ratio of 0.6, and an engine performance parameter of 4. This study did not attempt to make a recommendation rather provide the tools for the reader to select their own configuration based on their needs.

Propellant↗