Engineering topics

David B Wolff

Publications and source records attributed to David B Wolff.

10 records

NASA NTRS2022

GPM Ground Validation at NASA Wallops Precipitation Research Facility

The Wallops Precipitation Research Facility (WPRF) at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Wallops Island, VA has been established as a semi-permanent super-site for the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Ground Validation (GV) program. WPRF is home to research quality precipitation instruments, including NASA’s S-band dual-polarimetric radar (NPOL), and a network of profiling radars, disdrometers, and rain gauges. This study investigates the statistical agreement of the GPM Core Observatory Dual Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR), combined DPR-GPM Microwave Imager (GMI) and GMI Level II precipitation retrievals compared to WPRF ground observations from a six-year collection of satellite overpasses. Multi-sensor observations are integrated using the System for Integrating Multiplatform Data to Build the Atmospheric Column (SIMBA) software package. SIMBA ensures measurements recorded in a variety of formats are synthesized into a common reference frame for ease in comparison and analysis. Given that instantaneous satellite measurements are observed above ground level, this study investigates the possibility of a time lag between satellite and surface mass-weighted mean diameter (D(sub m)), reflectivity (Z), and precipitation rate (R) observations. Results indicate that time lags vary up to 30 minutes after overpass time but are not consistent between cases. In addition, GPM Core D(sub m) retrievals are within Level I mission science requirements as compared to WPRF ground observations. Results also indicate GPM algorithms overestimate light rain (< 1.0 mm hr(exp -1)). Two very different stratiform rain vertical profiles show differing results when compared to ground reference data. A key finding of this study indicates multi-sensor DPR/GMI combined algorithms outperform single sensor DPR algorithm.

Charanjit S Pabla↗

NASA NTRS2021

Snowfall in the Northern Great Lakes: Lessons Learned from a Multisensor Observatory

A multisensor snowfall observational suite has been deployed at the Marquette, Michigan, National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office (KMQT) since 2014. Micro Rain Radar (MRR; profiling radar), Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP; snow particle imager), and ancillary ground-based meteorological observations illustrate the unique capabilities of these combined instruments to document radar and concomitant microphysical properties associated with northern Great Lakes snowfall regimes. Lake-effect, lake-orographic, and transition event case studies are presented that illustrate the variety of snowfall events that occur at KMQT. Case studies and multiyear analyses reveal the ubiquity of snowfall produced by shallow events. These shallow snowfall features and their distinctive microphysical fingerprints are often difficult to discern with conventional remote sensing instruments, thus highlighting the scientific and potential operational value of MRR and PIP observations. The importance of near-surface lake-orographic snowfall enhancement processes in extreme snowfall events and regime-dependent snow particle microphysical variability controlled by regime and environmental factors are also highlighted.

Lake effects↗

NASA NTRS2021

Validation of Satellite-Based Precipitation Products from TRMM to GPM

The global precipitation measurement mission (GPM) has been in operation for seven years and continues to provide a vast quantity of global precipitation data at finer temporospatial resolutions with improved accuracy and coverage. GPM’s signature algorithm, the integrated multisatellite retrievals for GPM (IMERG) is a next-generation of precipitation product expected for wide variety of research and operational applications. This study evaluates the latest version (V06B) of IMERG and its predecessor, the tropical rainfall measuring mission (TRMM) multisatellite precipitation (TMPA) 3B42 (V7) using ground-based and gauge-corrected multiradar multisensor system (MRMS) precipitation products over the conterminous United States (CONUS). The spatial distributions of all products are analyzed. The error characteristics are further examined for 3B42 and IMERG in winter and summer by an error decomposition approach, which partitions total bias into hit bias, biases due to missed precipitation and false precipitation. The volumetric and categorical statistical metrics are used to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the two satellite-based products. All products show a similar precipitation climatology with some regional differences. The two satellite-based products perform better in the eastern CONUS than in the mountainous Western CONUS. The evaluation demonstrates the clear improvement in IMERG precipitation product in comparison with its predecessor 3B42, especially in reducing missed precipitation in winter and summer, and hit bias in winter, resulting in better performance in capturing lighter and heavier precipitation.

MRMS↗

NASA NTRS2021

Validation of Satellite-Based Precipitation Products from TRMM to GPM

The global precipitation measurement mission (GPM) has been in operation for sevenyears and continues to provide a vast quantity of global precipitation data at finer temporospatialresolutions with improved accuracy and coverage. GPM’s signature algorithm, the integratedmultisatellite retrievals for GPM (IMERG) is a next-generation of precipitation product expectedfor wide variety of research and operational applications. This study evaluates the latest version(V06B) of IMERG and its predecessor, the tropical rainfall measuring mission (TRMM) multisatelliteprecipitation (TMPA) 3B42 (V7) using ground-based and gauge-corrected multiradar multisensorsystem (MRMS) precipitation products over the conterminous United States (CONUS). The spatialdistributions of all products are analyzed. The error characteristics are further examined for 3B42 andIMERG in winter and summer by an error decomposition approach, which partitions total bias intohit bias, biases due to missed precipitation and false precipitation. The volumetric and categoricalstatistical metrics are used to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the two satellite-basedproducts. All products show a similar precipitation climatology with some regional differences.The two satellite-based products perform better in the eastern CONUS than in the mountainousWestern CONUS. The evaluation demonstrates the clear improvement in IMERG precipitationproduct in comparison with its predecessor 3B42, especially in reducing missed precipitation inwinter and summer, and hit bias in winter, resulting in better performance in capturing lighter andheavier precipitation.

Jianxin Wang↗

NASA NTRS2020

The GPM Ground Validation Program

We present a detailed overview of the structure and activities associated with the NASA-led ground-validation component of the NASA-JAXA Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission. The overarching philosophy and approaches for NASA's GV program are presented with primary focus placed on aspects of direct validation and a summary of physical validation campaigns and results. We describe a spectrum of key instruments, methods, field campaigns and data products developed and used by NASA's GV team to verify GPM level-2 precipitation products in rain and snow. We describe the tools and analysis framework used to confirm that NASA's Level-I science requirements for GPM are met by the GPM Core Observatory. Examples of routine validation activities related to verification of Integrated MultisatellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) products for two different regions of the globe (Korea and the US) are provided, and a brief analysis related to IMERG performance in the extreme rainfall event associated with Hurricane Florence is discussed.

precipitation↗

NASA NTRS2020

Chapter 19: Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission (IMERG)

The Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission (IMERG) is a U.S. GPM Science Team precipitation product. IMERG uses intercalibrated estimates from the international constellation of precipitation-relevant satellites and other data, including monthly surface precipitation gauge analyses, to compute half hour, 0.1° x 0.1° gridded datasets over 60°N-S (and partially outside of that latitude band) in three “Runs”—Early (4 h after obs time), Late (14 h after obs time), and Final (3.5 months after obs time). The concepts behind IMERG are briefly reviewed, together with major shifts related to changes in versions from the at-launch Version 03 to Version 05, and an outline of Version 06, which was released in late 2019.

George John Huffman↗

NASA NTRS2020

Comparison of Raindrop Size Distribution between NASA's S-Band Polarimetric Radar and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometers

The ground-based-radar-derived raindrop size distribution (DSD) parameters—mass-weighted drop diameter D mass and normalized intercept parameter NW—are the sole resource for direct validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM ) mission Core Observatory satellite-based retrieved DSD. Both D mass and NW are obtained from radar-measured reflectivity Z Hand differential reflectivity ZDR through empirical relationships. This study uses existing relationships that were determined for the GPM ground validation (GV) program and directly compares the NASA S-band polarimetric radar (NPOL) observables of Z Hand Z DR and derived D mass and NW with those calculated by two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD). The joint NPOL and 2DVD datasets were acquired during three GPM GV field campaigns conducted in eastern Iowa, southern Appalachia, and western Washington State. The comparative study quantifies the level of agreement for ZH, ZDR, D mass, and log (NW) at an optimum distance (15–40 km) from the radar as well as at distances greater than 60 km from radar and over mountainous terrain. Interestingly, roughly 10%–15% of the NPOLZH–Z DR pairs were well outside the envelope of 2DVD-estimatedZH–Z DR pairs. The exclusion of these pairs improved the comparisons noticeably.

Ali Tokay↗

NASA NTRS2020

Development and Evaluation of the Raindrop Size Distribution Parameters for the NASA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission Ground Validation Program

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission ground validation program uses dual-polarization radar moments to estimate raindrop size distribution (DSD) parameters, the mass-weighted mean drop diameter Dmass, and normalized intercept parameter NW, to validate the GPM Core Observatory–derived DSD parameters. The disdrometer-based Dmass and NW are derived through empirical relationships between Dmass and differential reflectivity ZDR, and between NW, reflectivity ZH, and Dmass. This study employs large datasets collected from two-dimensional video disdrometers (2DVD) during six different field studies to derive the requisite empirical relationships. The uncertainty of the derived Dmass(ZDR) relationship is evaluated through comparisons of 2DVD-calculated and ZDR-estimated Dmass, where ZDR is calculated directly from 2DVD observations. Similarly, the uncertainty of the NW(ZH, Dmass) relationship is evaluated through 2DVD-calculated and Dmass and ZH-estimated NW, where Dmass and ZH are directly calculated from 2DVD observations. This study also presents the sensitivity of Dmass(ZDR) relationships to climate regime and to disdrometer type after developing three additional Dmass(ZDR) relationships from second-generation Particle Size Velocity (PARSIVEL2) disdrometer (P2) observations collected in the Pacific Northwest, in Iowa, and at Kwajalein Atoll in the tropical Pacific Ocean. The application of P2-derived Dmass(ZDR) relationship based on precipitation in the northwestern United States to P2 observations collected over the tropical ocean resulted in the highest error among comparisons of the three datasets.

Ali Tokay↗

NASA NTRS2019

Assessing Dual-Polarization Radar Estimates of Extreme Rainfall During Hurricane Harvey

Hurricane Harvey hit the Texas Gulf Coast as a major hurricane on August 25, 2017 before exiting the state as a tropical storm on August 29, 2017. Left in its wake was historic flooding, with some locations measuring more than 60 inches of rain over a five-day period. The WSR-88D radar (KHGX) maintained operations for the entirety of the event. Rain gauge data from the Harris County Flood Warning System (HCFWS) was used for validation with the full radar data set to retrieve daily and event-total precipitation estimates for the period August 25-29, 2017. The KHGX precipitation estimates were then compared to the HCFWS gauges. Three different hybrid polarimetric rainfall retrievals were used, along with attenuation-based retrieval that employs the radar-observed differential propagation. An advantage of using a attenuation-based retrieval is its immunity to partial beam blockage and calibration errors in reflectivity and differential reflectivity. All of the retrievals are susceptible to changes in the observed Drop Size Distribution (DSD). No in situ DSD data were available over the study area, so changes in the DSD were interpreted by examining the observed radar data. We examined the parameter space of two key values in the attenuation retrieval to test the sensitivity of the rain retrieval. Selecting a value of α=0.015 and β=0.600 and β=0.625 provided the best overall results, relative to the gauges, but more work needs to be done to develop an automated technique to account for changes in the ambient DSD.

David B Wolff↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Retrieving DSD Moments from GPM-DPR: A Simulation Study Based on the Full DSD Spectra Characterized by the Generalized Gamma Model

Recently, a method to retrieve rain drop size distribution (DSD) moments from X-band dual polarization radar measurements has been developed using copolar reflectivity, differential reflectivity and specific attenuation. Two reference moments are retrieved first, followed by reconstructing the DSDs and calculating other moments using a generalized gamma model to represent the underlying shape, h(x), corresponding to the pair of chosen reference moments. Here we explore a similar approach but the retrieval method in this study uses dual-frequency radar measurements. In the case of GPM-DPR, the two frequencies are 13.8and 35 GHz, and their products include attenuation corrected reflecivities at both frequencies (Z and Z) and the specific attenuation (k, k, if available). Our approach is to use these products to determine two reference moments, namely M3 andM6 representing the third and the sixth moments respectively. Then, as with the polarimetric radar retrievals, we use the most probable h(x) to reconstruct the full DSD spectra, from which other moments are calculated. The best two DPR products for estimating M3 and M6 appear to be A and Z. Figure 1 shows the retrievals versus the ‘true’ moments. 2930 three-minute DSDs were used for the (T-matrix) scattering calculations at Ku and Ka bands but only cases with A > 0.5 dB/km were chosen. For the retrieved moments, the integration was performed only up to 6 mm drop diameter. The [1:1] line is included in Fig. 1. Even with just two DPR products as input the results seem promising, although the lower order moments show somewhat more scatter, especially the zeroth moment, M0. We will quantify the retrieval errors, and additionally examine the stability of h(x). For the latter, data from (i) Greeley, Colorado, (ii) Huntsville, Alabama, and (iii)Wallops, Virginia, will be used. Finally, a GPM overpass case over Huntsville, during a widespread rain event on 11 April 2016, will be considered as an initial test case.

precipitation↗