Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

David Friedlander

Publications and source records attributed to David Friedlander.

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Prediction of Turbulent Diffusing Flows Using FUN3D

The FUN3D code was used to perform Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations to compute subsonic flow in an S-duct diffuser and transonic flow in a two-dimensional diffuser using the Speziale-Sarkar-Gatski/Launder-Rodi-Reece (SSG/LRR) Reynolds stress model (RSM). For comparison purposes, additional simulations were run with the one-equation Spalart-Allmaras (SA) and the two-equation Menter Shear-Stress Transport (SST) turbulence models. Each model was run with and without the quadratic constitutive relation (QCR) for computing the turbulent stresses. It was shown that the simulations that utilized the RSM had better overall predictions of the diffusive flow fields compared to the simulations that utilized the one and two equation turbulence models.

Inlet Distortion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

X-59 Air Data Probe Calibration Wind Tunnel Test

NASA's aeronautical innovators are working with Lockheed Martin to design and build a supersonic X-plane, the X-59, under the the Low Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD) Project, that produces a gentle thump rather than a loud sonic boom. The plane will be used to collect human response data over select U.S. communities. The data from the X-59 test flights will be provided to U.S. and international regulators to potentially allow supersonic flight over land, drastically reducing travel time within the U.S. and around the world. Two wind tunnel tests were conducted in the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel to calibrate the nose probe for the X-59. The probe was successfully tested and calibrated at 19 Mach numbers between Mach 0.25 and Mach 1.7. Most data were collected using continuous roll angle sweeps at a set Mach number and pitch angle. About 725 high quality data runs were recorded during testing to be used in the calibration of the probe. A backup nose probe was also run through the same test matrix as the primary probe. The probe will be the primary instrument for the flight test of the X-59 for determining angle of attack, angle of sideslip, airspeed, and pressure altitude of the aircraft in flight. Knowing the aircraft's speed and attitude is critical for flight safety and is also critical data for the Sonic Boom mission. Areas of interest for the test were sea level takeoff and landing at Mach 0.2, subsonic cruise at Mach 0.9, and supersonic cruise at Mach 1.4. During Phase I flight testing, the air data nose probe and air data system as a whole will be further calibrated in flight to account for additional installed effects of the airframe on the air data system.

X-59↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

X-59 Air Data Probe Calibration Wind Tunnel Test

NASA's aeronautical innovators are working with Lockheed Martin to design and build a supersonic X-plane, the X-59, under the the Low Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD) Project, that produces a gentle thump rather than a loud sonic boom. The plane will be used to collect human response data over select U.S. communities. The data from the X-59 test flights will be provided to U.S. and international regulators to potentially allow supersonic flight over land, drastically reducing travel time within the U.S. and around the world. Two wind tunnel tests were conducted in the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel to calibrate the nose probe for the X-59. The probe was successfully tested and calibrated at 19 Mach numbers between Mach 0.25 and Mach 1.7. Most data were collected using continuous roll angle sweeps at a set Mach number and pitch angle. About 725 high quality data runs were recorded during testing to be used in the calibration of the probe. A backup nose probe was also run through the same test matrix as the primary probe. The probe will be the primary instrument for the flight test of the X-59 for determining angle of attack, angle of sideslip, airspeed, and pressure altitude of the aircraft in flight. Knowing the aircraft's speed and attitude is critical for flight safety and is also critical data for the Sonic Boom mission. Areas of interest for the test were sea level takeoff and landing at Mach 0.2, subsonic cruise at Mach 0.9, and supersonic cruise at Mach 1.4. During Phase I flight testing, the air data nose probe and air data system as a whole will be further calibrated in flight to account for additional installed effects of the airframe on the air data system.

X-59↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Measurement Accuracy and Uncertainty Analysis of the X-59 Air Data Probe Calibration Test Entry One

The X-59 is being developed to demonstrate quiet sonic boom technology. Data was obtained via two test entries in the NASA Glenn Research Center’s 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel to calibrate the X-59’s nose air data probe. The first entry tested two theoretically identical probes with the intention of one of the probes becoming the primary X-59 nose air data probe flight hardware and the other becoming a backup. A measurement accuracy and uncertainty analysis was performed on data obtained from the first test entry. The analysis showed that the uncertainties in the probe pressures were nearly identical for the two probes, with an average difference of 2.51 x 10-5 for the non-dimensional total pressure and 2.88 x 10-5 for the non-dimensional static pressures. The analysis also showed that the uncertainty in the probe yaw and pitch angles were 0.00034° and 0.01416°, respectively. This gives confidence in the X-59’s flight air data system.

Air Data Probe↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploring the Langtry-Menter Transition Model for High Speed Applications Using FUN3D

A series of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations were performed using the FUN3D flow solver to explore the capabilities of the Langtry-Menter Shear-Stress Transport (LM-SST) transition model for predicting transition for aircraft inlet applications. Two geometries were simulated: a zero-pressure-gradient flat plate and an axisymmetric cone exposed to hypersonic flow. In addition to the transition-sensitized LM-SST model investigations, simulations were run with the one-equation Spalart-Allmaras (SA) and the two-equation Menter Shear-Stress Transport (SST-V) RANS models in fully turbulent mode to identify the natural RANS model transition behavior as a function of Mach number when executed in fully turbulent mode. The flat plate simulations showed that (1) the transition model was able to predict rapid transition at a freestream Mach number of 0.2, which is expected but (2) the predicted transition location moved downstream as the freestream Mach number was increased for the simulations that used the SST-V turbulence model. The latter is significant as it is usually assumed that one- and two-equation turbulence models will produce fully turbulent flow very near the boundary layer origin. The flat plate simulation freestream Mach number trend was confirmed with simulations using the Wind-US code, which also saw a similar trend when employing the SA turbulence model. For the axisymmetric cone simulations, the transition location was highly sensitive to the inflow turbulence levels. This is significant as the prediction of the transition location is crucial when trying to predict inlet performance, especially for hypersonic vehicle applications. It was also noted that the predicted transition location for the cone when using the SST-V turbulence model agreed well with the predicted transition location from the equivalent zero-pressure-gradient flat plate case.

Transition Model↗