David Hudak | Search NASA

NASA NTRS2015

Global Precipitation Measurement Cold Season Precipitation Experiment (GCPEx): For Measurement Sake Let it Snow

As a component of the Earth's hydrologic cycle, and especially at higher latitudes,falling snow creates snow pack accumulation that in turn provides a large proportion of the fresh water resources required by many communities throughout the world. To assess the relationships between remotely sensed snow measurements with in situ measurements, a winter field project, termed the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Cold Season Precipitation Experiment (GCPEx), was carried out in the winter of 2011-2012 in Ontario, Canada. Its goal was to provide information on the precipitation microphysics and processes associated with cold season precipitation to support GPM snowfall retrieval algorithms that make use of a dual-frequency precipitation radar and a passive microwave imager on board the GPM core satellite,and radiometers on constellation member satellites. Multi-parameter methods are required to be able to relate changes in the microphysical character of the snow to measureable parameters from which precipitation detection and estimation can be based. The data collection strategy was coordinated, stacked, high-altitude and in-situ cloud aircraft missions with three research aircraft sampling within a broader surface network of five ground sites taking in-situ and volumetric observations. During the field campaign 25 events were identified and classified according to their varied precipitation type, synoptic context, and precipitation amount. Herein, the GCPEx fieldcampaign is described and three illustrative cases detailed.

GCPEx↗

NASA NTRS2008

GPM Pre-Launch Algorithm Development for Physically-Based Falling Snow Retrievals

In this work we compare and correlate the long time series (Nov.-March) n~easurements of precipitation rate from the Parsivels and 2DVD to the passive (89, 150, 183+/-1, +/-3, +/-7 GHz) observations of NOAA's AMSU-B radiometer. There are approximately 5-8 AMSU-B overpass views of the CARE site a day. We separate the comparisons into categories of no precipitation, liquid rain and falling snow precipitation. Scatterplots between the Parsivel snowfall rates and AMSU-B brightness temperatures (TBs) did not show an exploitable relationship for retrievals. We further compared and contrasted brightness temperatures to other surface measurements such as temperature and relative humidity with equally unsatisfying results. We found that there are similar TBs (especially at 89 and 150 GHz) for cases with falling snow and for non-precipitating cases. The comparisons indicate that surface emissivity contributions to the satellite observed TB over land can add uncertainty in detecting and estimating falling snow. The newest results show that the cloud icc scattering signal in the AMSU-B data call be detected by computing clear air TBs based on CARE radiosonde data and a rough estimate of surface emissivity. That is the differences in computed TI3 and AMSU-B TB for precipitating and nonprecipitating cases are unique such that the precipitating versus ~lon-precipitating cases can be identified. These results require that the radiosonde releases are within an hour of the AMSU-B data and allow for three surface types: no snow on the ground, less than 5 cm snow on the ground, and greater than 5 cm on the ground (as given by ground station data). Forest fraction and measured emissivities were combined to calculate the surface emissivities. The above work and future work to incorporate knowledge about falling snow retrievals into the framework of the expected GPM Bayesian retrievals will be described during this presentation.

Gail Skofronick-Jackson↗