Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

David Mitchell

Publications and source records attributed to David Mitchell.

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

The Endurance Rocket Mission

NASA’s Endurance sounding rocket (yard No. 47.001) will launch from Ny Ålesund, Svalbard in May 2022 on a solid fueled Oriole III-A launch vehicle. Its ∼19 minute flight will carry it to an altitude of ∼780 km above Earth’s sunlit polar cap. Its objective is to make the first measurement of the weak “ambipolar” electric field generated by Earth’s ionosphere. This field is thought to play a critical role in the upwelling and escape of ionospheric ions, and thus potentially in the evolution of Earth’s atmosphere. The results will enable us to determine the importance to ion escape of this previously unmeasured fundamental property of our planet, which will aid in a better understanding of what makes Earth habitable. Endurance will carry six science instruments (with 16 sensors) that will measure the total electrical potential drop below the spacecraft, and the physical parameters required to understand the physics of what generates the ambipolar field. The mission will be supported by simultaneous observations of solar and geomagnetic activity.

Glyn Collinson↗
NASA NTRS2021

Ionization Efficiency in the Dayside Ionosphere of Mars: Structure and Variability

Ionization efficiency, the ratio between photoelectron impact ionization and primary photoionization, is an important quantity from the perspective of ionospheric energy balance and as a quantity to be parameterized for use in global simulations. We investigate ionization efficiency using MAVEN in situ measurements of solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) flux, suprathermal electron flux, and neutral density. Its behavior with respect to pressure and solar zenith angle (SZA) is explained by ionization cross-sections and photoabsorption, plus photoelectron transport near the terminator. We find similar ionization efficiencies between the species CO 2 , O, N 2 , and CO, with Argon ∼40% higher, explained largely by its higher ionization potential. Efficiency depends positively on solar activity, increasing by ∼50–100% (depending on season) from low to moderate solar EUV levels, before flattening at higher EUV levels. EUV spectral hardening appears to be responsible for only ∼15% of this increase, the remainder best explained by variability in neutral composition. We find a negligible dependence of ionization efficiency on the strength and direction of crustal magnetic fields. Efficiencies agree poorly with the theoretical model of Nicholson et al. (2009), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15463.x, possibly reflecting differences in model versus measured solar EUV spectrum and neutral densities. We fit the data to the empirical parameterization of Mendillo et al. (2011), https://doi.org/10.1029/2011ja016865 but find that a single fit cannot capture ionization efficiency behavior across all dayside SZA values. We believe that an empirical model of Mars ionization efficiency will require MAVEN data and validated transport modeling to reach to sufficiently high pressures to capture Mars' photochemical peaks M1 and M2

Robert Lillis↗
NASA NTRS2020

Foreshock Cavities at Venus and Mars

“Foreshock cavities” are regions of turbulent and heated solar wind plasma that form upstream of Earth's bow shock. Despite being common at Earth, none have yet been reported at other planets. Here we present a survey of events encountered by the ESA Venus Express spacecraft consistent with foreshock cavities at Venus and a case study of a foreshock cavity encountered at Mars by NASA's MAVEN orbiter. Cavities appear to be common at Venus, and their properties appear to be very similar to those at Earth. Foreshock cavities appear to be observed preferentially in fast solar wind and when the interplanetary magnetic field is “radial” (parallel to the Sun‐planet line). Our collected observations are consistent with the hypothesis that “foreshock cavities” are simply the result of a transient encounter with a planetary foreshock. We posit foreshock cavities represent one of the following two possibilities: (1) a spacecraft encountering a traveling foreshock formed by a finite bundle of interplanetary magnetic field lines connecting to a shock or (2) the transient temporary motion of the foreshock over the spacecraft.

Foreschock↗