Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

David O Davis

Publications and source records attributed to David O Davis.

1- by 1-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel Sidewall Flowfield Compression Plate Study

A method for locally increasing the dynamic pressure in the test section of a supersonic wind tunnel is investigated from a theoretical, computational and experimental perspective, culminating in a reduced-scale, proof-of-concept test at Mach 3.44. Symmetric, variable-angle compression plates along the test section sidewalls generate oblique shockwaves to elevate the test section dynamic pressure (q). The experimental effort utilizes boundary-layer pitot rakes to sample the incoming flow near the floor, pitot and static rakes to measure the high-q core flow and numerous surface taps to map out the static pressure distribution along the floor, ceiling and sidewalls. A reliable and robust starting procedure is developed to establish supersonic flow in the test section and behind the compression plates. A characterization of the incoming floor boundary layer reveals previously documented features (such as a bulge toward the centerline) and an unexpected (and as-yet-unexplained) thickening of the boundary layer with increasing Reynolds number around total pressures of 40–60 psia. The high-q core flow is characterized for eight compression plate angles (4.0–8.0°), eight tunnel total pressures (20–139 psia) and three axial stations (24.95–27.35 inches). The peak dynamic pressure rise exceeds expectations. At conditions relevant to full-scale testing (6.0° and 139 psia), the dynamic pressure increases by a factor of 1.73, the Mach number becomes 2.85 and the total pressure drops imperceptibly. Basic distortion metrics show transverse non-uniformity of less than 5 %. Limited spatial resolution in the static rake measurements warrants additional, higher fidelity testing or computational analysis. Surface-mounted, fast-response instrumentation suggests minimal unsteadiness in the flow, less than a few percent of the mean (comparable to the sensor accuracy).

Wind tunnel testing, test techniques/methods, dyna↗

PIV Measurements of Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions at Mach 2.5 in a Circular Test Section

The particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurement technique has been applied to make detailed measurements in an impinging shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction (SWBLI) flowfield in a test section of circular cross-section. By virtue of this test section geometry, the flowfields studied are free from effects of the complex coupling of sidewall and corner interaction into the primary impinging shock interaction typical of a rectangular test section. The cone-cylinder shock generator hardware was arranged in both coaxial alignment with the test section to generate axisymmetric SWBLIs and in offset positions to generate swept SWBLIs. The angle of the conical section was also varied to alter the strength of the impinging shock wave. The application of the PIV technique in this test section required meticulous design to provide adequate optical access without disturbing the SWBLI flow. Details of the stereoscopic PIV apparatus and the velocity measurements obtained for a Mach 2.5 freestream are presented. Key features of the mean velocity and turbulent stress fields are highlighted. This data set should enable validation of computational fluid dynamics results for these flowfields.

Shockwave Boundary Layer Interaction↗

Cross-Measurement Comparisons for a CFD Validation Dataset on Mach 2.5 Axisymmetric Turbulent Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions

Experimental data for a shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction has been collected using multiple measurement techniques. Unfortunately, diversity of methods for acquisition begets an aggregation of data which does not directly quantify the same properties of the flowfield. The objective in this paper was to (a) present the collection of flowfield measurements in one venue in a format more usable for those validating CFD models against the data, (b) evaluate the degree to which the experimental data support each other, and (c) highlight the differences and relative advantages/shortcomings of each measurement techniques. To present the various measured quantities into common format, CFD results from a companion paper also submitted for presentation at this meeting are utilized. For the case where the boundary layer remains attached, there is agreement between the various measurements as well as with Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulation solutions. As the impinging shock strength is increased beyond the point of separating the boundary layer, the congruity of the data wanes. Generally, agreement among the measurements exceeds the degree to which the CFD solutions agree with experiments. This suggests that unmodeled physical phenomena, such as transient motion of the reflected shock and separation bubble, give rise to the discrepancies observed in the computational results.

Shock-wave Boundary-layer interaction↗