Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to David Urban.
This is a compilation of NASA Glenn presentation materials as part of the NASA Glenn/Korea Aerospace Research Institute Technical Interchange Meeting in August, 2024. NASA presentations cover Artemis, engines, cryogenic fluid management, microgravity and ISS sciences, extreme materials, and power.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Flame spread over solid fuels is a canonical problem in fire science, due to its direct implications on material flammability and importance in fire development. In a microgravity environment, such as onboard a spacecraft, flames can behave very differently than on Earth. This is concerning for spaceflight life safety, especially in higher-oxygen environments. Due to the difficulties associated with microgravity testing, low-pressure environments have been proposed as an alternative to approximately replicate the burning behavior of solid fuels observed in reduced gravity conditions because of similar diffusion and heat transfer mechanisms. However, the roles played by gravity and pressure on flame length, standoff distance, and flame spread rate vary with the burning configuration. In concurrent flame spread, the buoyant flow enhances the spread rate by bringing the flame closer to the fuel surface and increasing the heating of the solid fuel. In opposed flame spread, the sample is preheated by the flame ahead of the flame leading edge, which is strongly affected by the surrounding flow field. In this work, we consider flames spreading over thin cotton samples in both downward (opposed) and upward (concurrent) configurations to investigate the effect of pressure (30-100 kPa) on flame characteristics, such as spread rate and standoff distance. A small forced flow is induced upward so that the flames are exposed to a mixed (forced and free) flow. By reducing pressure, flames become less bright, their standoff distance increases, and their spread rates decrease similar to what is observed in low-gravity environments. These results could in help understanding the differences between flames spreading at low pressure and low gravity environments for these similar, yet very different, spreading configurations. They could also provide more information about potential Earth-based flammability testing of materials for spacecraft applications.
The spread of flames over the surface of solid combustible materials is affected by the environmental conditions. Variables such as flow velocity, oxygen concentration, ambient pressure, partial gravity or microgravity, may change the material flammability and influence the fire dynamics. This is an important fire safety issue for space exploration vehicles and space habitats which will very likely have different environments than those currently used on the International Space Station, such as reduced pressure and enriched oxygen concentration (SEA). However, testing experimentally the materials to be used and qualified for space exploration under these conditions is a difficult and expensive task. Here, numerical modeling is used to understand the dominant physico-chemical processes on the concurrent flame spread over thin fabrics under reduced ambient pressure (and in turn, buoyancy) and variable gravitational conditions. The numerical model uses the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS6) code with a single-step Arrhenius reaction rate for the solid phase decomposition. Different models are tested for the gas phase combustion kinetics. The model results are validated with experimental results obtained at similar reduced ambient pressure and flow conditions at 1 g. It is shown that as ambient pressure is reduced the flame spread rate over a thin fabric is also reduced, both experimentally and numerically. Numerical results are compared to an analytical approach previously developed to explain the experimental trends. Further interpretation of the model results provides information regarding the physics of the process and how they are affected by the lower pressure environments and gravity conditions. The results of this work provide guidance for potential on-earth testing for fire safety design in spacecraft and space habitats.
This is a summary of the NASA Materials Flammability Research Program. Recent results and upcoming work is presented
Spacecraft fires pose a threat to the success of future Lunar, Martian, and deep space exploration missions. As NASA plans to return humans to the Moon in the next decade, novel mission requirements will present new fire safety challenges. For example, materials that are fire resistant on Earth are expected to burn under planned habitat conditions (elevated oxygen concentrations and reduced cabin pressure) and partial gravity (0.16g). Optimal smoke detector placement will depend on a combination of buoyant plume velocities, induced by partial gravity, and Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS) parameters, including particle filtration rates, supply and return placement within the cabin, and forced air velocities. These ECLSS parameters must also address the need for rapid Lunar dust removal, as Lunar dust exposure poses a risk to crew health and hardware functionality. Here, we present progress toward a computational fluid dynamics model to evaluate smoke transport in a Lunar habitat. Recent work has demonstrated that if air supplies are placed on ceilings and returns on the floor, a buoyant smoke layer at the ceiling may disperse over the order of minutes even under low forced flow conditions. We expand upon these results to examine the influence of different supply and return configurations on smoke plume development. Additionally, we also address differences in the transport of smoke particles and Lunar dust by varying particle parameters like size, density, and shape factor. Finally, we discuss ongoing and future experimental efforts to measure smoke particle properties and transport under partial gravity, elevated oxygen, and reduced pressure conditions.
Portable fire extinguishers (PFEs) are a key component of spacecraft emergency response systems. The International Space Station uses custom PFEs to meet the unique microgravity and enclosed space requirements of the vehicle. For future crewed missions to Low Earth Orbit and Deep Space destinations, terrestrial commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) PFEs may offer more economical solutions for the destination as well as the visiting vehicle. However, depending on the design of both the spacecraft and the PFE, the reduced gravity environment is likely to impact PFE performance, especially when multiphase microgravity liquid transport processes are present. Additionally, many terrestrial PFEs now use halocarbons as the suppressant. While studies show these are effective in certain terrestrial fires, some data suggest that low concentrations may actually exacerbate a fire, a phenomenon that would prove particularly concerning in spacecraft. To better characterize the potential of employing COTS hardware, two terrestrial PFEs, one charged with HFC-227ea and Nitrogen pressurant and one charged with carbon dioxide, were modeled to predict performance in both 1-g and microgravity environments. Testing was conducted in 1-g to validate the model. Testing was also conducted to evaluate the effect of sub-extinguishment HFC-227ea concentrations on burn rate in controlled samples. Here we provide a detailed description of the model, report the methods and results of PFE testing, discuss the predicted effects of microgravity on PFE performance, and report the results of material burn rates at sub-extinguishment levels of HFC-227ea.
In order to design a safer spacecraft in terms of fire prevention, detection and cleanup, the transport of combustion products and heat must be predicted. Large-scale fire data was provided by the Saffire payload within Northrup Grumman’s Cygnus vehicle after a resupply mission to the ISS. Solid materials, including thick thermoplastic samples were ignited to study flame spread and the effect a fire has on a vehicle. Sensors that measured species and temperature were placed within Cygnus. A model using Pyrosim was developed to predict the thick fuel burn events from Saffire V by using sensor data from Cygnus. The heat transfer coefficient between the cabin air and cargo was previously calibrated using the cotton fuel burn event, and provided a good prediction of the temperature response within the vehicle during the two thick fuel experiments. The difference between the Saffire inlet CO 2 sensor, and the forward port standoff CO 2 sensor, which is the closest to the Saffire outlet, was used as an input into the model. This method provided an excellent prediction of the CO 2 response in the other parts of the Cygnus.
A fire inside a spacecraft poses one of the greatest dangers to the crew and mission success. As missions become more complex and longer in duration, the risk of a fire becomes more probable and catastrophic. A greater understanding of the effects of a fire inside a crewed vehicle at potential exploration atmospheres is needed. These exploration atmospheres, such as those being proposed for upcoming Lunar missions, include higher oxygen concentrations and lower pressures, also known as Normoxic conditions. Full scale fire testing, such as those performed during previous space programs, is the most straightforward way to obtain this understanding. These tests are difficult to implement in 1-g and even more challenging to attempt in Lunar-g. Modeling can help inform experiments aimed at determining flammability properties of common materials at exploration atmospheres, as well as determine the effect a fire has inside a spacecraft. A model can also be easily simulated in Lunar-g to predict the effect of gravity on fire propagation. This work focuses on a model of a theoretical partial crew cabin, with potential fire sources being a laptop and a Nomex sleeping bag. A simulation of the crew cabin during a high Heat Release Rate (HRR) fire and low HRR fire at 1-g was compared to simulations at Lunar-g. It was found that in both the low and high HRR cases, the temperature in the cabin was higher in the Lunar-g case than in the 1-g case. This is likely due to the hot products moving out the door of the crew cabin faster in the 1-g case. Modeling case studies like these will help guide future full-scale flammability experiments on Earth and allow for the prediction of fire spread in a Lunar gravity environment in order to design a safer crew cabin.
A model developed using Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) that aimed to determine the effect of a fire in a spacecraft was validated by data collected during the Saffire campaign. The model used inlet and outlet temperatures and CO 2 concentrations of the Saffire payload where fire spread was taking place to determine the amount of heat and combustion products that made it into Northrop Grumman’s Cygnus vehicle. The model was then validated using six remote sensors in various places in the vehicle, as well as a far field device (FFD) in the open zenith section that was representative of average vehicle values. The current work focuses on using the model to predict fire safety scenarios. One simulation aimed to determine the fate of HCl, which sticks to surfaces. The model prediction showed that the HCl was removed from the atmosphere rapidly. This compared well against the FFD data in the Saffire VI campaign event where a bottle of 5% HCl was released into the vehicle. An additional simulation where the Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) was shut off once the FFD reached 5 ppm of HCl showed that HCl stayed in the atmosphere considerably longer. Continuing the simulation with the ECLSS activated and after temperatures returned to their initial conditions, resulted in a rapid removal of HCL similar to that observed in the original HCl release scenario model. Finally, a simulation that used the heat release rate from a lithium-ion battery test to determine the effect it would have on a spacecraft was performed. This simulation used a heat addition rate that is considerably higher than what was determined from the burning of solid fuels in the Saffire campaign and hence produced a non-trivial temperature increase in more locations within the vehicle.
Spacecraft are designed to prevent fires through careful material selection and configuration control combined with electrical design controls and isolation of ignition sources. Despite these best efforts, fire risk still exists due to the potential for configuration changes with the introduction of crew and the potential for a ‘failure of imagination’ by designers in anticipating all fuel and ignition sources. Therefore, fire suppression is a critical capability for any crewed spacecraft as a last resort for crew survival. Many spacecraft suppression methods have relied on fire suppressants such as compressed carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and water. A proposed alternative is depressurization of the cabin as a method to extinguish a fire. Limited testing was conducted during Skylab and showed that depress could result in stirring the air flow and aggravating a fire before extinguishing. However, limited information was available on how the test was conducted. To better characterize the approach, testing was conducted at NASA’s White Sands Test Facility to evaluate the effect of depressurization on material extinguishment. The results showed that depressurization does not provide a safe and effective fire suppression capability. The testing approach, results, and conclusions are described and discussed.
We present preliminary results on the development of a fire detection system for partial and low gravity environments. A significant challenge is the design of a system with a low false alarm rate. The detection system therefore has to discriminate between combustion particles, cabin, and lunar dust. Aerosol properties are measured and cross referenced to the target detectors at the Gases and Aerosols from Smoldering Polymers (GASP) Laboratory located at the NASA Glenn Research Center. A computational fluid dynamics plume model is also employed to determine the smoke transport properties of the targeted habitats.