Component Performance Investigation of J71 Experimental Turbine X : Effect of First-stator Adjustment; Internal Flow Conditions of J71-97 Turbine with 132-percent-design Stator Area
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Davison, Elmer H.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The performance results, as well as a compressor-turbine match point study based on a particular mode of engine operation, are compared with those previously obtained with the same turbine having first-stator areas 70, 95.6, and 132 percent of design. Maximum efficiencies for all turbine configurations were high, on the order of 87 to 89 percent. The efficiencies obtained at the match points for the 87-, 95.6-, and 132-percent turbines were slightly lower. No match point for the 70-percent turbine was obtained because, with first-stator areas less than 75.5 percent of design, the turbine would develop insufficient work to drive the compressor at the match point.
Modifying the original turbine by closing down the first-rotor throat area and shrouding the first and second rotors resulted in an over-all increase in in efficiency of 3.5 percentage points. At equivalent design work and speed the rating and aerodynamic efficiences of the modified turbine were 0.825 and 0.846, respectively. The maximum rating and erodynamic efficiencies were 0.875 and 0.906, respectively. A radial survey indicated improved firstively. A radial survey indicated improved first and second-stage efficiencies but showed that the effective throat areas of the second stator and rotor were too large.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Results of a survey investigation of the J71-97 experimental three-stage turbine equipped with a first-stator area 70 percent pf design are presented and compared with the turbine with a first-stator area 97 percent of design.
The brake internal efficiency of the highly loaded two-stage turbine was 0.79 equivalent design work and speed. The maximum brake internal efficiency was 0.84. A radial survey revealed these major defects: (1) the first-rotor throat area was too large, and a large area of underturned flow existed near the tip;(2) considerable underturning existed at the second-stator outlet; and (3) tangential components of velocity at the turbine outlet amounted to 2.5 points in turbine efficiency.
An experimental invesitgation of the effect of increasing the first-stator area of the J71-97 experimental three-stage turbine from 97 percent of design to 132 percent revealed (1) the maximum efficiency obtained decreased from 0.891 to 0.869, (2) the choking equivalent weight flows increased by approximately 13.6 percent, and (3) at the turbine match points required to maintain the compressor at constant design equivalent conditions the turbine efficiency decreased from 0.87 to 0.86.
The over-all component performance characteristics of a J71 experimental three-stage turbine with 97 percent design stator areas were determined over a range of speed and pressure ratio at inlet-air conditions of approximately 35 inches of mercury absolute and 700 degrees R. The turbine break internal efficiency at design operating conditions was 0.877; the maximum efficiency of 0.886 occurred at a pressure ratio of 4.0 at 120 percent of design equivalent rotor speed. In general, the turbine yielded a wide range of efficient operation, permitting flexibility in the choice of different modes of engine operation. Limiting blade loading of the third rotor was approached but not obtained over the range of conditions investigated herein. At the design operating point, the turbine equivalent weight flow was approximately 105 percent of design. Choking of the third-rotor blades occurred at design speed and an over-all pressure ratio of 4.2.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.