Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Deng, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Deng, P..

REBUS-PC v1.5 Verification Test Summary

Motivated in part by its usage for analysis of the University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR), the verification of the REBUS-PC software for θ-R-Z geometries is discussed and displayed in this manuscript. Of particular importance is to show that the eigenvalue, flux, power, and burnup outputs of the software given a user problem is correct. REBUS-PC contains many features and MURR only makes use of some of those aspects. As an example, the use of region specific cross section sets, interpolation of the cross section data with respect to burnup, and automatic movement of control rods during the fuel cycle is discussed and displayed. To demonstrate the accuracy, 22 verification tests based upon 7 physical geometries are discussed. Geometry descriptions are provided in Section 2 and the REBUS-PC results for each verification test are discussed in Section 3. These verification tests consist of both analytic problems with known solutions and a more complicated input consistent with usage of REBUS-PC on the MURR reactor itself called STRZ. In this verification test summary report, the REBUS-PC software is repeatedly demonstrated to reproduce, or closely match, the eigenvalue, flux, and power distributions from analytic test problem solutions, demonstrating that the implemented finite difference approximation in θ-R-Z is working as intended. Several additional REBUS-PC features are tested, such as control rod movement by detailed comparisons of the results against reference solutions obtained using an auxiliary implemented MatLab program. As expected, the REBUS-PC software produces results that are 100% consistent with the stated capabilities and thus the verification exercise is completed. These verification tests should be executed with each re-compilation of the REBUS-PC source and after any source code changes. All output results from any such new work should be rigorously compared against the stored output of the 22 verification tests cited in this report that forms the basis of the verification process.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗