Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Derek Inaba

Publications and source records attributed to Derek Inaba.

11 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wear Test of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first wear test of the 12.5 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit 2 (AEPS ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne. The ETU-2 Wear Test accumulated approximately 730 hours of operation split between the nominal 600 V/12.5 kW condition and the 300 V/6.25 kW condition previously identified as the worst-case erosion condition.

Jason D. Frieman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Characterization Test of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the detailed characterization testof the 12.5 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit 2 (AEPS ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne. This test campaign had two major goals: to assessthe risk of design compliance with thruster requirements and providea comparison to the previously-tested NASA Hall Effect Rocket with Magnet Shielding Technology Demonstration Units (HERMeS TDUs) from which the AEPS ETU design was derived.

AEPS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

12.5kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Thruster Development Testing

Since 2012, NASA has been developing the12.5kW Hall Effect Rocket with Magnetic Shielding (HERMeS)thruster to serve the need for deep space propulsion. Aerojet Rocketdyne (AR)is developing the HERMeS Hall Current Thruster (HCT)into a flight capable design through the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) program. In execution of this program, Aerojet Rocketdyne has designed, built and begun test of two Engineering Test Unit (ETU)HCTs, designated ETU-1 and ETU-2. This paper presents some of the preliminary results from theETU-1 thruster and draws comparisons to previous HERMeS Technology Demonstration Units (TDUs)and theETU-2 characterization unit. The ETU-1 thruster serves to evaluate the ETU design against dynamic and thermal environments while ETU-2 undergoes operational characterization and wear testing. The thruster has been exposed to acceptance and qualification-level vibration and shock testing and has undergone acceptance and characterization hot-firing to evaluate thruster performance after exposure to dynamic environments. The results have demonstrated that the dynamic environments have not had an adverse effect on performance and demonstrated that stability and operating characteristics remain unaffected. Together, ETU-1 and ETU-2 HCTs have demonstrated operating performance and characteristics in-family with each other and with the NASA HERMeS Technology Demonstration Units.

AEPS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Performance of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the performance test campaign of the 12.5 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne. This test campaign had three major goals: to assess design compliance with thruster requirements, provide a comparison to the previously-tested NASA Hall Effect Rocket with Magnet Shielding (HERMeS) Technology Demonstration Units (TDUs) from which the AEPS ETU design was derived, and support AEPS application on the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). Assessments of ETU-2 performance were conducted at discharge powers of 2.6 to 13.1 kW, which encompasses the original AEPS throttle conditions as well as those most relevant for AEPS application on PPE. The results from the test campaign indicate that ETU-2 performance meets or exceeds all AEPS thruster performance requirements and matches the values and trends previously measured with the HERMeS TDUs. In addition, similar to the HERMeS TDUs, ETU-2 performance showed minimal variation over approximately 1636 h of operating time due to the incorporation of magnetic shielding. Taken together, these results show that the AEPS design is successfully replicating the performance of the HERMeS TDUs to within the empirical uncertainty and meeting its performance requirements as the design progresses to its Critical Design Review.

HERMeS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Performance of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the performance test campaign of the 12.5 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne. This test campaign had three major goals: to assess design compliance with thruster requirements, provide a comparison to the previously-tested NASA Hall Effect Rocket with Magnet Shielding (HERMeS) Technology Demonstration Units (TDUs) from which the AEPS ETU design was derived, and support AEPS application on the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). Assessments of ETU-2 performance were conducted at discharge powers of 2.6 to 13.1 kW, which encompasses the original AEPS throttle conditions as well as those most relevant for AEPS application on PPE. The results from the test campaign indicate that ETU-2 performance meets or exceeds all AEPS thruster performance requirements and matches the values and trends previously measured with the HERMeS TDUs. In addition, similar to the HERMeS TDUs, ETU-2 performance showed minimal variation over approximately 1636 h of operating time due to the incorporation of magnetic shielding. Taken together, these results show that the AEPS design is successfully replicating the performance of the HERMeS TDUs to within the empirical uncertainty and meeting its performance requirements as the design progresses to its Critical Design Review.

Jason D Frieman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Extended Performance Characterization of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first detailed performance assessment of the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne at the throttle conditions most relevant for AEPS application on the Gateway Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). First, an assessment was performed of ETU-2 performance and backpressure sensitivity at the previously-tested throttle points of 300 V/6.25 kW, 400 V/8.33 kW, 500 V/10.42 kW, and 600 V/12.5 kW that confirmed ETU-2 and the test facility were both operating nominally and consistent with historical baselines. ETU-2 performance and stability were then assessed throughout the PPE throttle range of 2.6-12 kW and shown to be in-family with predictions based on the scaling of previous results. Taken together, these results will help inform application of AEPS on PPE as the AEPS design progresses towards its Critical Design Review.

Jason D Frieman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Extended Performance Characterization of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first detailed performance assessment of the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne at the throttle conditions most relevant for AEPS application on the Gateway Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). First, an assessment was performed of ETU-2 performance and backpressure sensitivity at the previously-tested throttle points of 300 V/6.25 kW, 400 V/8.33 kW, 500 V/10.42 kW, and 600 V/12.5 kW that confirmed ETU-2 and the test facility were both operating nominally and consistent with historical baselines. ETU-2 performance and stability were then assessed throughout the PPE throttle range of 2.6-12 kW and shown to be in-family with predictions based on the scaling of previous results. Taken together, these results will help inform application of AEPS on PPE as the AEPS design progresses towards its Critical Design Review.

HERMeS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Extended Wear Testing of the 12-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first wear test of the 12 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) intended to isolate the impact of discharge current on component wear rates. Testing was led by Aerojet Rocketdyne and performed with the AEPS Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster. In total, approximately 860 hours of operation were accumulated split between operating conditions of 600 V/9 kW, 600 V/11 kW, and 600 V/12 kW. Thruster performance and stability were invariant throughout the wear test for all thruster throttle conditions and shown to be equal to the values previously measured with ETU-2. Inner front pole cover erosion rates were found to be invariant to discharge current as the measurements at all three operating conditions were equal to within the empirical uncertainty. Outer front pole cover erosion rates were found to be equal for the 600 V/9 kW and 600 V/12 kW conditions with operation at 600 V/11 kW yielding elevated erosion rates. Overall, the data shows that the AEPS thruster design has a high probability of meeting lifetime and performance requirements as the design proceeds to flight production and qualification.

Jason D Frieman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Extended Wear Testing of the 12-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first wear test of the 12 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) intended to isolate the impact of discharge current on component wear rates. Testing was led by Aerojet Rocketdyne and performed with the AEPS Engineering Test Unit 2 (ETU-2) thruster. In total, approximately 860 hours of operation were accumulated split between operating conditions of 600 V/9 kW, 600 V/11 kW, and 600 V/12 kW. Thruster performance and stability were invariant throughout the wear test for all thruster throttle conditions and shown to be equal to the values previously measured with ETU-2. Inner front pole cover erosion rates were found to be invariant to discharge current as the measurements at all three operating conditions were equal to within the empirical uncertainty. Outer front pole cover erosion rates were found to be equal for the 600 V/9 kW and 600 V/12 kW conditions with operation at 600 V/11 kW yielding rates that were comparable to those on the inner front pole cover. Overall, the data shows that the AEPS thruster design has a high probability of meeting lifetime and performance requirements as the design proceeds to flight production and qualification.

HERMeS↗