Deutch, Steve | Search NASA

DOE OSTI2022

Elemental Analysis of Bio-Oils by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP), Issue Date: May 13, 2022

Concentrations of inorganic elements is a key quality metric for bio-oils as certain elements impact upgrading processes and product quality. Unless reduced or removed during production and processing, alkali and alkaline metals native to lignocellulosic biomass can carry over into bio-oils contributing to ash content and degraded catalyst performance during upgrading to hydrocarbon fuels or chemical products. Non-metallic elements such as sulfur and phosphorus can also negatively impact upgrading catalysts and product quality. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) can be used to measure inorganic elements of interest in bio-oils. This procedure covers the preparation and analysis of fast pyrolysis (FP) and catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) bio-oils. The concentrations of these elements can indicate potential bio-oil quality from the perspective of deoxygenation processes. The implications of elemental composition will depend on process parameters such as upgrading catalyst sensitivities. This Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) covers two methods for quantification of inorganic elements by ICP-OES: Procedure A uses microwave assisted digestion with concentrated nitric acid, and Procedure B is an organic ICP-OES method utilizing a diglyme solvent.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, and Oxygen in Bio-Oils: Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP)

The determination of total carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen in bio-oils is important as these values can be used to track the carbon balance of production processes as well as calculate total oxygen content by difference. Oxygen content of bio-oils is a key metric for production and upgrading strategies as these are typically aimed at reducing oxygen. Oxygenates in bio-oils contribute to poor hydrocarbon miscibility, high acidity, high viscosity, and poor stability. Upgrading of bio-oils via deoxygenation produces hydrocarbons which can be used to generate feedstocks for renewable fuels and chemicals. In this Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP), combustion-based ultimate analysis is used to determine the weight percent (wt%) of C, H, and N in bio-oils and upgraded products. Ultimate analysis uses high temperatures and a pure oxygen environment to completely combust organic samples to carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), water (H 2 O), and nitrogen oxides (NO x ). In this procedure the amount of C and H in the sample are quantified by measuring resultant CO 2 and H 2 O with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). For N, NO x is reduced to nitrogen (N 2 ) which is measured with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD), providing total N content.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Determination of Water Content in Bio-Oils by Volumetric Karl Fischer Titration: Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP)

The water content of bio-oils is a key metric for several reasons. Water is typically the most concentrated single component of fast pyrolysis oils, though this will be much lower in catalytic fast pyrolysis and upgraded products. Reduced water content is preferable in bio-oil as water can contribute to phase separation, corrosivity, and instability. Additionally, lower water is beneficial for physical properties such as energy density. The percentage of water can also be used to correct the calculation for organic oxygen when determining total oxygen content of bio-oils via combustion-based ultimate analysis. The procedure described here is specifically written for the analysis of bio-oils, and is based on ASTM E203, Standard Test Method for Water Using Volumetric Karl Fischer Titration. This standard test method is specified for measuring the mass % water in pyrolysis liquid biofuels in ASTM D7544, Standard Specification for Pyrolysis Liquid Biofuel. Although the standard method is prescribed for the analysis of pyrolysis liquids for use in industrial and commercial burners, the method is not specifically written for this product. The method described with this Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) provides specific guidance for the analysis of bio-oils. Both organic and aqueous phases can be measured with this technique.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Bioprocessing Separations Consortium Three-Year Overview: Technical Advances, Process Economics Influence, and State of the Science

The Bioprocessing Separations Consortium solves separations challenges that are unique to bioprocessing. To do this, the Consortium uses two methods: applying existing technologies to new challenges and developing new technologies that may address these unique challenges better than today’s commercial technologies. In its research and development, the Consortium leverages its three core capabilities: materials development and evaluation, process development, and analysis and computation. In its first three years, from 2016 to 2019, the Consortium addressed four critical challenges in biochemical and thermochemical processing. First, the Consortium targeted the fractionation of lignin to enable valorization of this portion of biomass that offers diverse, complex, and valuable building blocks and products. Second, Consortium researchers developed technologies to enable process intensification, which can reduce equipment needs, energy consumption, and waste generation, thereby cutting bioprocessing capital costs and rendering processes more efficient. Third, the Consortium sought to recover carbon from dilute aqueous streams that are common to bioprocessing; recovering dilute carbon can improve process efficiency and economics. Finally, Consortium researchers designed and developed new materials and catalysts to reduce targeted foulants and poisons in bioprocessing streams that can limit the lifetime of downstream catalysts or fermenting microorganisms. Table 1 lists the technologies that were examined and places them in the context of the Consortium’s capabilities, types of bioprocesses, and critical challenges in bioprocessing separations. Overall, across these projects, we have developed separations technologies for 10 bioprocesses, addressed 9 target compounds in bioprocessing, developed 10 materials, and evaluated 4 processes for cost and sustainability.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Bioprocessing Separations Consortium Three-Year Overview: Technical Advances Process Economics Influence, and State of the Science

The Bioprocessing Separations Consortium solves separations challenges that are unique to bioprocessing. To do this, the Consortium uses two methods: applying existing technologies to new challenges and developing new technologies that may address these unique challenges better than today’s commercial technologies. In its research and development, the Consortium leverages its three core capabilities: materials development and evaluation, process development, and analysis and computation. In its first three years, from 2016 to 2019, the Consortium addressed four critical challenges in biochemical and thermochemical processing. First, the Consortium targeted the fractionation of lignin to enable valorization of this portion of biomass that offers diverse, complex, and valuable building blocks and products. Second, Consortium researchers developed technologies to enable process intensification, which can reduce equipment needs, energy consumption, and waste generation, thereby cutting bioprocessing capital costs and rendering processes more efficient. Third, the Consortium sought to recover carbon from dilute aqueous streams that are common to bioprocessing; recovering dilute carbon can improve process efficiency and economics. Finally, Consortium researchers designed and developed new materials and catalysts to reduce targeted foulants and poisons in bioprocessing streams that can limit the lifetime of downstream catalysts or fermenting microorganisms. Table 1 lists the technologies that were examined and places them in the context of the Consortium’s capabilities, types of bioprocesses, and critical challenges in bioprocessing separations. Overall, across these projects, we have developed separations technologies for 10 bioprocesses, addressed 9 target compounds in bioprocessing, developed 10 materials, and evaluated 4 processes for cost and sustainability.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2020

Bioprocessing Separations Consortium: Three-Year Overview - Technical Advances, Process Economics Influence, and State of the Science

The Bioprocessing Separations Consortium solves separations challenges that are unique to bioprocessing. To do this, the Consortium uses two methods: applying existing technologies to new challenges and developing new technologies that may address these unique challenges better than today’s commercial technologies. In its research and development, the Consortium leverages its three core capabilities: materials development and evaluation, process development, and analysis and computation. In its first three years, from 2016 to 2019, the Consortium addressed four critical challenges in biochemical and thermochemical processing. First, the Consortium targeted the fractionation of lignin to enable valorization of this portion of biomass that offers diverse, complex, and valuable building blocks and products. Second, Consortium researchers developed technologies to enable process intensification, which can reduce equipment needs, energy consumption, and waste generation, thereby cutting bioprocessing capital costs and rendering processes more efficient. Third, the Consortium sought to recover carbon from dilute aqueous streams that are common to bioprocessing; recovering dilute carbon can improve process efficiency and economics. Finally, Consortium researchers designed and developed new materials and catalysts to reduce targeted foulants and poisons in bioprocessing streams that can limit the lifetime of downstream catalysts or fermenting microorganisms. Table 1 lists the technologies that were examined and places them in the context of the Consortium’s capabilities, types of bioprocesses, and critical challenges in bioprocessing separations. Overall, across these projects, we have developed separations technologies for 10 bioprocesses, addressed 9 target compounds in bioprocessing, developed 10 materials, and evaluated 4 processes for cost and sustainability.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗