Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Dolling, D. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Dolling, D. S..

Fluctuating wall pressures near separation in highly swept turbulent interactions

Fluctuating wall pressures have been measured in Mach 5 interactions generated by sharp, upswept fins at angles of attack of 16 to 28 deg. The results show that rms pressure distributions, like the mean, can be collapsed in conical coordinates. The wall pressure signal near separation is intermittent and is qualitatively similar to that measured in unswept interactions and other swept flows. However, the dominant separation shock frequencies in the swept flows are up to an order of magnitude higher than those in unswept interactions under identical incoming flow conditions. In light of the present observations, it appears that an earlier remark, by Gilson and Dolling, that separation is characterized by a shuddering compression system, in contrast to a translating separation shock is erroneous due to a combination of weak shock strength and inadequate spatial resolution. Furthermore, although the maximum rms pressure near separation increases with increasing interaction strength, as in swept compression ramp flows, comparison of data from the two flow types indicates that the appropriate correlating parameter is the interaction sweepback angle.

Schmisseur, J. D.↗

Unsteady Phenomena in Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interaction

A brief review is given of the unsteadiness of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. The focus is on interactions generated by swept and unswept compression ramps, by flares, steps and incident shock waves, by cylinders and blunt fins, and by glancing shock waves. The effects of Mach number, Reynolds number, and separated flow scale are discussed as are the physical causes of the unsteadiness. The implications that the unsteadiness has for interpreting time-average surface and flowfield data, and for comparisons of such experimental data with computation, is also briefly discussed. Finally, some suggestions for future work are given. It is clear that there are large gaps in the data base and that many aspects of such phenomena are poorly understood. Much work remains to be done.

Dolling, D. S.↗

Control of unsteady shock-induced turbulent boundary layer separation upstream of blunt fins

Fluctuating wall pressure measurements have been made on centerline upstream of blunt fins in a Mach 5 turbulent boundary layer. Standard time series analysis and conditional sampling algorithms have been used to examine the effects of leading edge sweepback, leading edge shape, and fin root modifications on the fluctuating pressures. Leading edge sweep considerably reduces the mean and rms pressure loading at the fin root, the extent of the region of unsteady separation shock motion, and the separation length. The frequency of pressure fluctuations in the intermittent region increases with leading edge sweepback, while the spectral content of pressure fluctuations in the separated region is virtually unchanged by leading edge sweep. A swept hemicylindrically blunted root fillet reduces the centerline upstream influence and intermittent region length by 50 percent, and reduces the mean and rms pressure loading at the fin root by about 75 percent and 95 percent respectively. Experiments using hemicylindrical, wedge shaped and flat leading edges show that while separated flow scales increase with increasing 'bluntness', intermittent region length and root loading decrease, and separation shock frequency increases.

Kleifges, K.↗

Flowfield dynamics in blunt fin-induced shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions

Fluctuating wall pressure measurements were made on centerline upstream of a blunt fin in a Much 5 turbulent boundary layer. By examining the ensemble average wall pressure distributions for different fixed shock foot positions, it was shown that local fluctuating wall pressure measurements are due to a distinct pressure distribution, P(i), which undergoes a stretching and flattening effect as its upstream boundary translates aperiodically between the upstream influence and separation lines. The locations of the maxima and minima in the centerline wall standard deviation distribution can be accurately predicted using this distribution, providing quantitative confirmation of the model. This model also explains the observed cross-correlations and ensemble average measurements within the interaction. Using the P(i) model, wall pressure signals from under the separated flow region were able to reproduce the position-time history of the separation shock foot. The negative time delay peak in the cross-correlation between the predicted and actual shock foot histories shows that the separated region fluctuations precede shock foot motion.

Brusniak, L.↗

Computation of turbulent, separated, unswept compression ramp interactions

Examination of the literature shows that the comparison between experiment and computation for highly separated unswept compression ramp flows is generally poor, irrespective of the turbulence model used. In general, the upstream influence is not correct, the wall pressure rise through separation is too steep, and the pressures under the separated shear layer are too high. In the current study, the objective is to determine if these discrepancies might be attributed more to other factors such as flowfield unsteadiness or three-dimensionality, rather than to inadequate turbulence modeling. To examine this possibility, multichannel wall pressure fluctuations were measured under the unsteady separation shock wave in a 28-deg unswept compression ramp flow at Mach 5. The results show that the large scale, low frequency separation shock unsteadiness controls the distribution of time-averaged surface properties and that neglect of the unsteadiness is probably the primary cause of the discrepancy between experiment and computation.

Marshall, T. A.↗

An experimental examination of the effects of incoming boundary layer modifications on the dynamics of a turbulent compression corner interaction

This experimental study examines the effects of modifications to the incoming turbulent boundary layer on the highly separated shock wave/boundary layer interaction generated by an unswept compression corner. Particular focus is placed on the motion of the unsteady separation shock wave. The flowfield was generated by a 28 deg ramp in a Mach 5 flow with a freestream Reynolds number of 50 x 10 exp 6/m. The incoming turbulent boundary layer transitioned naturally and developed under near-adiabatic wall conditions. Modification of the flow entering the interaction was effected through either a single plate boundary layer manipulator (BLM) or riblets. The BLM reduced the length of separation by 35-45 percent and reduced the streamwise extent of the separation shock motion by 36-74 percent. Examination of the flowfield downstream of the BLM showed this result to be due to the inviscid preturning of the flow by the BLM, and not by changes to the boundary layer dynamics. The riblets had no measurable effect on the compression corner interaction.

Mcclure, W. B.↗

Unsteady separation in sharp fin-induced shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at Mach 5

Fluctuating wall-pressure measurements are made in shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions generated by sharp/unswept fins at angles of attack of 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, and 28 degrees at Mach 5. The experiment was conducted under approximately adiabatic wall temperature conditions. The mean and rms pressure distributions can be collapsed in conical coordinates. The wall-pressure signal near separation is intermittent for all angles of attack (16-28 deg) and is qualitatively similar to that measured in unswept flows. However, the shock frequencies are higher - about 5 kHz compared to 0.5-1 kHz. Over the range of sweepbacks examined, from 25-55 deg, the spectral content of the fluctuating pressures does not change. Thus, the increase in separation-shock frequency from 1 to 5 kHz occurs at lower interaction sweepback and is not a continuous process with increasing sweepback. Power spectra at the position of maximum rms in the intermittent region for interactions in different incoming boundary layers have the same center frequency. The maximum rms in the intermittent region correlates with interaction sweepback, not with overall inviscid pressure rise.

Schmisseur, J. D.↗

Separation shock motion in fin, cylinder, and compression ramp - Induced turbulent interactions

In conjunction with new experimental results at Mach 5, an examination has been made of published data on unsteadiness of shock-induced turbulent boundary-layer separation. The data are all wall pressure fluctuation measurements made under the unsteady separation shock and are from interactions induced by compression ramps, blunt and sharp fins, and circular cylinders. There is little evidence of a link between the separation shock zero-crossing frequency and characteristic frequency of the incoming boundary layer. The low shock frequencies and low shock speeds, and the trends with changes in model geometric parameters and incoming boundary layer, suggest that turbulent or global fluctuations at the upstream boundary of the separated flow drive the shock motion.

Dolling, D. S.↗

Unsteady shock-induced turbulent separation in Mach 5 cylinder interactions

Wall pressure fluctuations have been determined under the unsteady separation shock in interactions generated by unswept circular cylinders, using a nominal freestream Mach number of 5 and a freestream unit Reynolds number of 53 x 10 to the 6th/m. The distributions of shock frequency and period were calculated using a conditional sampling algorithm. The shock frequency distributions were all found to be broadband, with frequencies being typically 1-2 kHz. The results support the previous suggestion that pressure fluctuations in the separated flow drive the shock motion.

Dolling, D. S.↗

Driving mechanism of unsteady separation shock motion in hypersonic interactive flow

Wall pressure fluctuations were measured under the steady separation shock waves in Mach 5 turbulent interactions induced by unswept circular cylinders on a flat plate. The wall temperature was adiabatic. A conditional sampling algorithm was developed to examine the statistics of the shock wave motion. The same algorithm was used to examine data taken in earlier studies in the Princeton University Mach 3 blowdown tunnel. In these earlier studies, hemicylindrically blunted fins of different leading-edge diameters were tested in boundary layers which developed on the tunnel floor and on a flat plate. A description of the algorithm, the reasons why it was developed and the sensitivity of the results to the threshold settings, are discussed. The results from the algorithm, together with cross correlations and power spectral density estimates suggests that the shock motion is driven by the low-frequency unsteadiness of the downstream separated, vortical flow.

Dolling, D. S.↗