Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Dougherty, N. S., Jr.

Publications and source records attributed to Dougherty, N. S., Jr..

Flight and wind-tunnel correlation of boundary-layer transition on the AEDC transition cone

Transition and fluctuating surface pressure data were acquired on a 10 degree included angle cone, using the same instrumentation and technique over a wide range of Mach and Reynolds numbers in 23 wind tunnels and in flight. Transition was detected with a traversing pitot pressure probe in contact with the surface. The surface pressure fluctuations were measured with microphones set flush in the cone surface. Good correlation of end of transition Reynolds number Re (sub T) was obtained between data from the lower disturbance wind tunnels and flight up to a boundary layer edge Mach number, M (sub e) = 1.2. Above M (sub e) = 1.2, however, this correlation deteriorates, with the flight Re (sub T) being 25 to 30% higher than the wind tunnel Re (sub T) at M (sub e) = 1.6. The end of transition Reynolds number correlated within + or - 20% with the surface pressure fluctuations. Broad peaks in the power spectral density distributions indicated that Tollmien-Schlichting waves were the probable cause of transition in flight and in some of the wind tunnels.

Fisher, D. F.↗

Flight and wind-tunnel correlation of boundary-layer transition on the AEDC transition cone

Transition and fluctuating surface pressure data were acquired on a 10 deg included angle cone, using the same instrumentation and technique over a wide range of Mach and Reynolds numbers in 23 wind tunnels and in flight. Transition was detected with a traversing pitot-pressure probe in contact with the surface. The surface pressure fluctuations were measured with microphones set flush in the cone surface. Good correlation of end of transition Reynolds number RE(T) was obtained between data from the lower disturbance wind tunnels and flight up to a boundary layer edge Mach number, M(e) = 1.2. Above M(e) = 1.2, however, this correlation deteriorates, with the flight Re(T) being 25 to 30% higher than the wind tunnel Re(T) at M(e) = 1.6. The end of transition Reynolds number correlated within + or - 20% with the surface pressure fluctuations, according to the equation used. Broad peaks in the power spectral density distributions indicated that Tollmien-Schlichting waves were the probable cause of transition in flight and in some of the wind tunnels.

Fisher, D. L.↗

In-flight transition measurement on a 10 deg cone at Mach numbers from 0.5 to 2.0

Boundary layer transition measurements were made in flight on a 10 deg transition cone tested previously in 23 wind tunnels. The cone was mounted on the nose of an F-15 aircraft and flown at Mach numbers room 0.5 to 2.0 and altitudes from 1500 meters (5000 feet) to 15,000 meters (50,000 feet), overlapping the Mach number/Reynolds number envelope of the wind tunnel tests. Transition was detected using a traversing pitot probe in contact with the surface. Data were obtained near zero cone incidence and adiabatic wall temperature. Transition Reynolds number was found to be a function of Mach number and of the ratio of wall temperature to adiabatic all temperature. Microphones mounted flush with the cone surface measured free-stream disturbances imposed on the laminar boundary layer and identified Tollmien-Schlichting waves as the probable cause of transition. Transition Reynolds number also correlated with the disturbance levels as measured by the cone surface microphones under a laminar boundary layer as well as the free-stream impact.

Fisher, D. F.↗

Boundary-layer transition on a 10-deg cone - Wind tunnel/flight correlation

Boundary-layer transition location measurements were made on a 10-deg sharp cone in 23 wind tunnels of the US and Europe and in flight. The data were acquired at subsonic, transonic, and supersonic Mach numbers over a range of unit Reynolds numbers to obtain an improved understanding of wind tunnel flow quality influence. Cone surface microphone measurements showed Tollmien-Schlichting waves present. Transition location defined by pitot probe measurements showed transition Reynolds number to be correlatable to cone surface disturbance amplitude within + or - 20 percent for the majority of tunnel and flight data.

Dougherty, N. S., Jr.↗

Prepared comment on the cone transition Reynolds number data correlation study

A sharp, smooth, 10-deg-included-angle cone was tested on twenty-one major wind tunnels of the United States and Western Europe to obtain correlation data on the effect of acoustic disturbances in wind tunnel flow on boundary layer transition Reynolds number. The cone is planned to be flight tested in order to obtain a basis of reference for the wind tunnel data over a nominal range of Mach numbers from 0.4 to approximately 2.0. Wind tunnel data obtained over a Mach number range from 0.2 to 4.6 are broadly characterized according to wind tunnel test section geometry and, in turn, to the types of acoustic disturbances associated with the geometry.

Dougherty, N. S., Jr.↗

Transition Reynolds number comparisons in several major transonic tunnels

Boundary-layer transition and test section environmental noise data were acquired in six major transonic wind tunnels as a part of a broader correlation of the effect of free-stream disturbances on transition Reynolds number. The data were taken at comparative test conditions on a sharp, smooth 10-deg included-angle cone. It was found that aerodynamic noise sources within the test section were the dominant sources of unsteadiness and that transition Reynolds number provided a good indicator for the resulting degradation in flow quality. Amplitudes, frequency composition, directivity, and origin of these disturbances are described.

Dougherty, N. S., Jr.↗