NASA Input on Fluid Lines to Vulnerability Report
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
MMOD↗
Engineering topics
E L Christiansen
Publications and source records attributed to E L Christiansen.
SpaceX Dragon Spacecraft Post Flight MMOD Inspection Campaign
The SpaceX Dragon spacecraft performed 20 resupply flights to the International Space Station (ISS) between 2012 and 2020. After each mission, a team led by the NASA Johnson Space Center Hypervelocity Impact Technology (HVIT) Group inspected each Dragon vehicle exterior for hypervelocity impact damage. A general description of the inspected vehicle areas is provided as well as mission details such as exposure duration and launch dates. This paper documents the general inspection procedure for collection of data and the post inspection data analysis process. It also provides details of the observation data collected in addition to the spectroscopic analysis results of intact samples collected to discern the source of the impacting particle. A comparison between observed impacts and the expected number of damage features calculated by Bumper 3 with the latest micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) environments are also presented. Statistics on the >300 impact features documented in the database will provide insight into the depth to diameter ratios and other relationships. The quality of the comparison between the observations and code predictions are dependent on several factors. The paper provides details of each of these variables.
orbital debris↗
XRF Characterization of MMOD Impact Damage
Introduction The Hypervelocity Impact Technology (HVIT) Group at the NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) has performed over 150 post flight MMOD inspections on returned space-ex-posed hardware and collected over 1,600 samples. Determination of the impactor source typically requires an analysis of the projectile residue in the damage feature. At this time, about 20% of the samples have been processed. Types of Samples Samples in the HVIT group collection can be classified into two types. Indirect (non-destructive) samples are produced when a pliable material (e.g., adhesive tape or dental mold) is inserted into an impact feature. With this type of sampling technique, crater material and (hopefully) projectile residue material is embedded in the sample media and can detected using further chemical characterizing techniques. Direct (destructive) sampling involves the in-tact extraction of material from the spacecraft and is done in a manner that the entire impact feature can be excised intact. This technique provides the greatest chance of successfully determining impactor source due to the entirety of the projectile remnants being present within the collected sample. Updated Projectile Residue Detection Techniques Previous assessments of projectile provenance have involved the use of samples that are first mounted in epoxy, sectioned to expose the crater interior, imaged with a scanning electron microscope (SEM), then any observed impactor residue was then analyzed using an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). This technique, while proven, may be supplemented with other types of elemental analysis techniques that can observe major element chemistry, in order to improve throughput of sample analysis. The Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science (ARES) Division at JSC, for example, operates a Bruker M4 Tornado micro-X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer, capable of creating elemental maps of areas around these small impact features in a couple of hours, with a spot size <20 μm. The potential advantage with this technique lies in sample preparation, as no polishing or conductive coatings are needed. Early trials attempted to deter-mine impactor composition by collecting spectra from intact samples by aiming the X-Rays directly into the impact feature, but the signal:noise ratio was too low for confident material identification. Sample preparation for XRF then relies on sectioning the samples parallel to the impactor trajectory in order to expose the largest area of subsurface damage possible, thus maximizing the signal from any small impactor remnants. Complementary to the use of XRF for sample analysis, ARES also houses a Nikon XTH 320 micro-X-Ray computed tomography (XCT). This instrument can be used to create 3D visualizations of impact damage for the determination of crater volumes and dimensions, as well as for the determination of the best place to section each sample for the subsequent XRF analysis.
J L Hyde↗
Understanding the Response of Common Spacecraft Shields to Hypervelocity Impacts of Meteorite and Other Terrestrial Analog Materials
Micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) populations can vary significantly in composition, density, and homogeneity. Hypervelocity testing campaigns intended to design and optimize MMOD shields for spacecraft are recognizing the need to investigate shield response from different types of impactors that span the range of densities observed in the MMOD population, such as nylon, Al, Al 2 O 3 , steel, and Cu. These tests, however, still pre-dominantly employ spherical and homogenous projectiles. Adding any compositional or mineralogical complexity to the impactor, such as what would be expected from a polymineralic micrometeoroid, for ex-ample, will be concomitant with a more complex shockwave structure in the projectile after it impacts the outer surface of any type of MMOD shield. The magnitude of these complexities will depend on how varied the mineralogy of the projectile is, but in the case of a metal-bearing chondrite, the disparate shock impendence between adjacent metal and silicate grains will potentially create localized areas of shock focusing (local increase in nominal shock pressure), or shock shadowing (local decrease in nominal shock pressure). The response of a MMOD shield is generally predicted using a ballistic limit equation – a semiempirical curve, derived from hypervelocity testing data, that denotes a particle diameter (for a given set of impact conditions such as projectile density and impact angle) when a shield will fail as a function of impact speed. These curves exhibit inflection points as a function of impact speed that represent when the projectile experiences sufficient pressure to fragment, melt, or vaporize. The introduction of shock focusing and shadowing in a heterogenous projectile will add uncertainty to the predicted pressures needed to go through each transition, leading to increased uncertainty in the expected performance of the MMOD shield. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the performance of MMOD shields in hypervelocity tests against more complex, natural projectile materials. To this end we have conducted a comparative test series to begin investigating the impact damage caused by meteoritic and terrestrial-analog projectiles, to that of spherical Al projectiles of similar mass.
Impact testing↗