E Spencer Williams | Search NASA

NASA NTRS2021

Dynamic Ensemble Prediction of Cognitive Performance in Space

Astronauts are exposed to a unique set of stressors in spaceflight. Microgravity, isolation, confinement, and environmental and operational hazards: all of these can impact sleep, vigilant attention, and alertness, which are critical to mission success. In this paper, we seek to understand the most important predictors of alertness over the course of a space mission, using self-reported, cognitive, and environmental data collected from 24 astronauts on 6-month missions to the International Space Station (ISS). Alertness was repeatedly and objectively assessed on the ISS with a brief 3-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) that is highly sensitive to sleep deprivation. To relate PVT performance to time-varying and sparsely-measured environmental, operational, and psychological covariates, we propose a n ensemble prediction model comprising of linear mixed effects regression, random forest, and functional concurrent regression models. An extensive cross-validation procedure reveals that this ensemble outperforms any one of its components alone. We also discover that a participant’s past performance, reported fatigue and stress, and temperature and radiation exposure were among the most important variables associated with alertness. This method is broadly applicable to environmental studies where the main goal is accurate, individualized prediction involving a mixture of person-level traits and irregularly measured time series.

Danni Tu↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Spaceflight Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Ethyl Acetate

Ethyl acetate is a simple organic compound that occurs naturally and is used industrially as a solvent. It has been detected in the ISS atmosphere and is known to off-gas from building materials. As NASA astronauts have been and will be exposed to ethyl acetate during space missions, Spaceflight Maximum Allowable Concentrations (SMACs) were developed following an extensive review of the available literature.

E Spencer Williams↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Chemical Challenge Tests on ISS Fire Cartridges

Following a confirmed combustion event onboard the International Space Station (ISS), crewmembers will don Emergency Masks, each fitted with 2 ISS fire cartridge filters. As the crewmember breathes through the filters, combustion products in the cabin air are either filtered or catalyzed by the fire cartridge media to minimize crew exposure to harmful levels of contaminants. Rigorous certification, acceptance, and surveillance programs for the fire cartridges ensure that each lot meets stringent performance requirements during the beginning of and throughout the service life of the cartridges. In accordance with the Quality/Acceptance Test Plan, multiple fire cartridges from each lot undergo chemical challenge tests, with each test lasting 2.5 hours and involving one or more chemicals at specified concentrations. These tests are conducted at specific temperatures, humidity levels, and gas flow rates intended to mimic the worst-case conditions for fire cartridge performance. These challenge tests are conducted by the Environmental Chemistry Laboratory at the NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center. The majority of the challenge tests focus on carbon monoxide (CO), but other gases include hydrogen cyanide (HCN), hydrogen chloride (HCl), cyclohexane, acrolein, and acetaldehyde. A fire cartridge is exposed to the test gas in a test chamber at the specified conditions and the outlet is monitored for breakthrough during the 2.5-hour test. This paper will briefly introduce fire cartridges and how they work, then discuss details of the challenge gas delivery and exposure system, breakthrough monitoring methods, and discussion of issues that have arisen during the course of the test program. Although the focus of this paper will be on the conduction of the challenge tests, a general summary of the performance of the fire cartridges will be provided.

Fire Cartridge↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Differential Mobility Spectrometry on the ISS: Successes and Current Concerns

With the construction of the International Space Station (ISS), crew members moved from the relatively short flights of the Space Shuttle (~ 2 weeks) to missions lasting months to a year. As such, environmental monitoring needs also changed, transitioning from a reliance on archival sampling to a combination of archival sampling and in-flight data collection. In the case of trace volatile organic compound (VOC) monitoring, this in-flight monitoring was performed early on by the Volatile Organic Analyzer (VOA), a gas chromatograph-ion mobility spectrometer, which operated on the ISS for 7 years. This large, fixed-position analyzer was replaced by Air Quality Monitors (AQMs), a pair of small gas chromatograph-differential mobility spectrometers, in the spring of 2013. During their initial half decade of use, and covering multiple sets of units, the AQMs performed well, meeting all of their validation criteria and generally showing excellent accuracy when compared to the now-reduced archival samples. These instruments were also used to perform a survey of the US Operating Segment (US Lab Module, European Columbus Module, and Japanese Pressurized Module), confirming that the atmosphere in this segment is well-mixed. The AQMs were also able to provide important information in contingency situations, such as confirming that no ammonia was present on the ISS following alarms suggesting that the coolant loops had leaked in January 2015. As the fleet of AQMs has aged, though, issues of concern have arisen. These have ranged from pervasive electronics board problems to loss of sensitivity due to carbon dioxide to incorrect identification of compounds. Some of these issues are unavoidable due to the nature of the AQM’s use and preparation prior to flight. However, with the extension of the ISS to 2030 (well past its original 2024 lifetime), the fleet of AQMs will be asked to perform longer, requiring solutions to some of the inherent problems. In this presentation, we will discuss the history of the AQM on the ISS with a focus on more recent results. These results show both the continued usefulness of the AQM for atmospheric monitoring and also the current concerns, including: 1) the incorrect identification of benzene, 2) reporting of elevated isopropanol concentrations, and 3) the loss of the reactant ion peak (RIP) that must be resolved in order for the instrument to continue to serve as the primary trace VOC monitor on the ISS.

W T Wallace↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of Volatile Compounds from CO2 Removal Systems

One of the primary concerns when designing CO2 scrubber systems that will be integrated with a Sabatier reactor to produce water and methane is the amount of water released from the scrubber. Because the gas stream entering a Sabatier reactor must be compressed, water entering the reactor can condense and compromise the integrity of the system, thus rendering its valuable conversion capability useless. When the Johnson Space Center Environmental Chemistry Laboratory was tasked to develop an assay to quantify the water concentration in air samples from CO2 scrubbers, additional testing was also performed to see if any other compounds were being concentrated on the scrubbers. It was thought that the efficiency of the scrubber systems could be quantified by comparing the differences in samples from the ambient air on the International Space Station (ISS) to the exit gas of the scrubber. As this analysis was carried out, it became evident that the concentrations of certain volatile compounds were higher in the samples from the scrubbers than they were in nominal environmental samples. This meant these compounds were being retained and concentrated on the scrubber beds. Based on this finding, concerns were raised about their potential for these compounds to poison the Sabatier reactor. Further investigation was required to identify these compounds due to their high concentrations and unique matrix of the CO2 scrubber exhaust. This paper describes these events as well as the process that was developed to identify the volatile compounds that increased. An examination of how much the certain compounds can be concentrated by the scrubber systems is also included.

Volatiles↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of Volatile Compounds From CO2 Removal Systems

One of the primary concerns when designing CO2 scrubber systems that will be integrated with a Sabatier reactor to produce water and methane is the amount of water released from the scrubber. Because the gas stream entering a Sabatier reactor must be compressed, water entering the reactor can condense and compromise the integrity of the system, thus rendering its valuable conversion capability useless. When the Johnson Space Center Environmental Chemistry Laboratory was tasked to develop an assay to quantify the water concentration in air samples from CO2 scrubbers, additional testing was also performed to see if any other compounds were being concentrated on the scrubbers. It was thought that the efficiency of the scrubber systems could be quantified by comparing the differences in samples from the ambient air on the International Space Station (ISS) to the exit gas of the scrubber. As this analysis was carried out, it became evident that the concentrations of certain volatile compounds were higher in the samples from the scrubbers than they were in nominal environmental samples. This meant these compounds were being retained and concentrated on the scrubber beds. Based on this finding, concerns were raised about their potential for these compounds to poison the Sabatier reactor. Further investigation was required to identify these compounds due to their high concentrations and unique matrix of the CO2 scrubber exhaust. This paper describes these events as well as the process that was developed to identify the volatile compounds that increased. An examination of how much the certain compounds can be concentrated by the scrubber systems is also included.

Volatiles↗