Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Edward H Glaessgen

Publications and source records attributed to Edward H Glaessgen.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2026

Computational Materials for Qualification and Certification (CM4QC) Strategy Document: Maturation of Computational Materials Methods for Aviation-Focused Qualification and Certification of Metal Additive Manufacturing (as an Example of Process-Intensive Materials)

Although considerable scientific and technological advances have been made in recent years in additive manufacturing (AM) processes, these advances have not translated into significant market penetration of AM parts within the aviation industry. It is broadly acknowledged that using traditional qualification and certification (Q&C) approaches for AM components is one of the most significant barriers to broader adoption of AM, resulting in high costs, long product development and certification timelines, and complex design iterations during the product development cycle. A new approach is urgently needed. This document lays out a vision for a new Q&C paradigm with increased use of computational materials (CM) methods aimed at decreasing the time and cost of Q&C of process-intensive material (PIM) approaches in the aviation industry, with AM as the immediate use case. This vision was developed with substantial input from industry, regulatory agencies, government research organizations, and academia.

Edward H Glaessgen↗
NASA NTRS2021

NASA / NIST / FAA Technical Interchange Meeting on Computational Materials Approaches for Qualification by Analysis for Aerospace Applications

This report documents the goals, organization and outcomes of a Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM) on Computational Materials Approaches for Qualification by Analysis, co-organized by NASA, NIST and the FAA. The TIM was held at NASA Langley Research Center on January 15-16, 2020. Approximately 60 subject matter experts (SMEs) representing 8 aerospace manufacturers, 7 government organizations and 2 universities participated. Expertise of the SMEs spanned the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale from the low-to-mid TRL focus of government laboratories and universities to the high TRL perspective of the regulatory organizations and aerospace manufacturers. During this TIM, the future needs of the government regulators and manufacturers motivated the overall discussion and framed the input given by the participants. Hence, the key objectives of the TIM were to understand existing gaps in model-based, e.g., computational materials, processing and performance predictions for aerospace materials and components and forecast how they can be matured to support material, process and part-level qualification and certification (Q&C). The TIM focused on process-intensive metallic materials technologies, including, but not limited to, additive manufacturing. Participation was roughly evenly divided among the processing and performance tracks, suggesting that both topic areas are generally perceived as being both valuable and requiring additional investment. The output of this TIM may be used by both participating and other organizations, in part, as guidance for future national efforts on maturing computational materials capabilities for use in the Q&C of advanced metallic material systems in aerospace applications.

Edward H Glaessgen↗
NASA NTRS2020

A Computational Study to Investigate the Effect of Defect Geometries on the Fatigue Crack Driving Forces in Powder-Bed AM Materials

Powder-bed additive manufacturing (AM) processes are associated with the formation of multiple types of process-specific pores, including but not limited to lack-of-fusion (LoF) and keyhole pores. The performance of an AM component is dependent on the type of pores, their density and their proximity to the free surface, and other heterogeneities in the microstructure. In order to characterize the influence of porosity on the mechanical behavior of AM materials, it is imperative to quantitatively analyze the heterogeneous strain accumulation in the vicinity of porosity. Process-specific microstructure models are generated using SPPARKS, an open-source process simulation code. Spherical keyhole or irregular LoF pores are embedded into the microstructure models, which are meshed and input into a finite element code, ScIFEN, to solve for the heterogeneous strain localization in the vicinity of the pores. Given the non-smooth geometries of LoF pores, they readily promote strain accumulation in their vicinity thereby increasing the propensity of initiating fatigue cracks.

Saikumar R Yeratapally↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

TPSAS-NF1676L-32709-DND

Outline - Process-Structure-Performance Framework - Process-Specific Defects in selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing (AM) process - Idealized Keyhole/Entrapped gas pores - Idealized Lack of Fusion (LoF) pores - Influence of Pore Geometry on Strain Localization - 3D Model of LoF pores - Partial validation of the 3D LoF 2 model

Saikumar R Yeratapally↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

TPSAS-NF1676L-13792-DND

Extreme structural requirements of future aerospace vehicles motivate the development of new, ultra-durable materials and game-changing methodologies for material certification and sustainment. Computational simulations spanning many orders of magnitude in length and time scales—from the nanoscale of underlying damage processes to the larger scales of continuum cracks—are being developed to support these requirements. Results of these simulations are used to deduce key aspects of material response to loads and environments, including: - The microstructural mechanics that govern metal fatigue crack initiation and growth - The variety and complexity of the dislocation-precipitate interac- tions that underpin plastic behavior and damage evolution - The energetic principles that govern the interaction of water with crack surfaces within a structural component - The mechanics of grain boundary separation Modeling the physics behind these metal fatigue behaviors is extremely complex, and requires intensive, high-fidelity simulations. The knowledge gained through these simulations, however, is forming the keystone for advanced material design and will enable development of more capable, reliable structures for aerospace vehicles.

Jacob Hochhalter↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Next Generation Durability and Damage Tolerance to Support Certification of Flight Hardware

Durability and Damage Tolerance (D&DT), as currently applied to flight hardware throughout the Agency, is based on continuum and similitude assumptions and does not consider local material properties, environments and responses. These limitations impact our ability to support certification of new component designs, material systems and manufacturing approaches. The primary concern in this Engineering R&A plan is related to the imminent proliferation of parts produced by additive manufacturing (AM). These parts are being advocated by NASA’s suppliers for use on a myriad of flight hardware because of their design flexibility and cost advantages. AM provides opportunities to reduce part counts through complex geometry and reduce manufacturing costs of low volume parts. However, AM materials have some notable metallurgical and microstructural differences compared to traditionally fabricated materials. One of the challenges for the acceptance of AM is the greater tendency for a deleterious defect state, most commonly in the form of porosity, to exist in AM parts. Though this defect state is typically reduced through a hot isostatic pressing (HIP) processing step, the structural performance risks associated with the remaining defects and HIP-healed features is not known. Potential fracture control issues that must be resolved stem from the real possibility that an unhealed defect or a closed defect with less than pristine strength remains at a fracture critical location after HIP. As a result, NASA and the entire aerospace community have been confronted with the need to develop a robust and relevant certification methodology to enable safe implementation of these components. The present work is an important step toward positioning NASA to credibly respond to vendors’ push to implement this new AM materials technology by improving our understanding of AM processing and performance and transitioning that research-based understanding to next-generation engineering capabilities.

Edward H Glaessgen↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Additive Manufacturing Moment Measure (AM3) Approach to Predictions of Solid Cooling Rate and Time Above Melt

Qualification of a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (LPBF-AM) process requires knowledge of the multi-scale material physics during the process, per part. As the LPBF-AM build occurs, each moment is influenced by the process history. Knowledge of the build sequence can be used to generate a discretized time-space-condition point field that when coupled with a nearest neighbors’ calculation results in a generalized and fully parallel process model computation. This GPU accelerated approach was developed for part-scale analysis of build files along with in-situ process monitoring sensor data and is termed the “Additive Manufacturing Moment Measure” (AM3). The AM3 approach will be presented and then used to evaluate an AM Bench relevant geometry with synchronized in-situ process data, ex-situ nondestructive evaluation, and optical microscopy observations. These comparisons permit a better understanding of how the process actions can affect the LPBF-AM build quality and the signals generated during in-situ process monitoring.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Towards Qualification and Certification of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Ti-6Al-4V with In-Situ Process Monitoring and Automated Defect Detection

Qualification and certification of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts are two challenges that must be answered to ensure suitability for critical applications. In-situ monitoring using high frame rate thermal and conventional optical imaging sensors is applied to the LPBF build process. Currently, the large volume of data from such sensors becomes untenable for manual inspection in production environments. This presentation serves to address this in-situ monitoring deficiency in two ways. First, a framework for managing data streams from LPBF process monitoring sensors is described. Second, two candidate image analysis techniques are presented: one is a set of heuristics that are easily interpretable, and the other is an uninterpretable convolutional neural network. These strategies are compared in terms of performance, computational expense, and speed. These methodologies represent platforms for connecting processing conditions to process modeling efforts aligned with the qualification and certification mission for LPBF Ti-6Al-4V components.

Qualification↗