Engineering topics

Edwards, Tommy B.

Publications and source records attributed to Edwards, Tommy B..

3 records

DOE OSTI2019

Composition-Based Density Model for High Level Waste Glasses

In this report, the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) provides a first-principles model capable of predicting the density of high-level waste (HLW) glass based on the glass composition. The model relies on the additivity of the specific volume of bound glass oxides to obtain a quantitative evaluation of the approximate glass density. A database of glass densities and compositions was compiled from various sources including previous Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) variability study glasses, HLW studies from other institutions, and literature references. There are a total of 1104 glass compositions in the database with densities ranging from 2.224 g/cm 3 to 3.997 g/cm 3 . The breadth of the compositional coverage space is reported as well. A predictive method was investigated in which the glass density was calculated as a function of the weighted partial molar volumes of the individual glass oxides and the molar mass of the glass. This method yielded a high correlation between the predicted density and the measured density. In addition, a linear regression of these predictions indicated that the predicted value was equal to the measured within the bounds of analytical uncertainty. The following conclusions were drawn from the results of these analyses: 1. Measured glass density is highly correlated with glass composition (R 2 ≈ 0.95). 2. The correlation between glass density and glass composition can be expressed as either: a. A weighted sum of the individual oxide glass-component densities, or b. A weighted sum of the individual oxide glass-component partial molar volumes. 3. A linear regression of the predicted density via partial molar volume method to the measured density yields a slope of 0.9975 and an intercept of -0.0007 – the uncertainty interval associated with these coefficients contain one and zero, respectively. 4. The fitted coefficients and associated uncertainty intervals of the linear regression of the predicted density via the partial molar volume method to the measured density suggest that the predicted theoretical density is, within analysis uncertainty, equal to the measured density of the glass. It is recommended that glass density measurements included with the variability study for each sludge batch be discontinued. In their place, SRNL will calculate a bounding glass density value for the frit/sludge system using the model. It is also recommended that DWPF implement the density model as part of the fissile loading determination portion of the SME acceptability process. Details for implementation are provided in this report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Characterization of Hanford LAW Phase 3 Glasses

This report provides analyses of glass compositions, wash solution compositions, and Product Consistency Test (PCT) leachate compositions for a series of simulated low-activity waste (LAW) glasses fabricated at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). These data will be used in the development of improved property/composition models for LAW glass at Hanford. Chemical analyses were performed on a representative sample of each of the quenched and sulfur saturated glasses to allow for comparisons with the targeted compositions. For some of the quenched glasses, measured concentrations of Cr 2 O 3 , K 2 O, Na 2 O, P 2 O 5 , and ZrO 2 were below the targeted values. For some of the sulfur saturated glasses, the measured concentrations of Al 2 O 3 , Cl - , Cr 2 O 3 , F - , K 2 O, Na 2 O, P 2 O 5 , V 2 O 5 , and ZrO 2 were generally low relative to the targeted values. A comparison of the measured compositions of the quenched and sulfur saturated versions of the study glasses showed that the measured concentrations of Al 2 O 3 , Cl - , and F - were lower for most of the sulfur saturated glasses. The measured Cr 2 O 3 and K 2 O concentrations were markedly lower for the sulfur saturated versions of the glasses as compared to the quenched versions, which may indicate that these elements partitioned to the soluble sulfur salts. A set of modified glasses was received from PNNL later in this study. Chemical analysis showed that these glasses generally met their targeted compositions with the exception of Cr 2 O 3 concentrations, which were considerably higher than the targeted values. The measured SO 3 concentrations were higher for most of the sulfur saturated glasses relative to those of the quenched versions, as expected. Chemical analysis of the wash solutions that resulted from preparation of the sulfur saturated melts identified Cr, K, Na, P, S, and V as the major elements in solution. With the exception of sulfur, this may explain why the measured concentrations of these components in the study glasses were generally below the targeted values. PNNL performed PCTs on quenched and canister centerline cooled (CCC) versions of the study glasses, as well as the modified glasses. The leachates were sent to SRNL for chemical analysis. Minor scatter in the measured values among the triplicate samples for each glass was noted, with significant differences among the triplicate values noted for four of the CCC glasses. Normalized concentration values for some of the study glasses were greater than the 100 g/L maximum (total dissolution), which may indicate an error in the test. It is recommended that PNNL review their performance of the PCTs to determine the cause of these potential outliers and errors.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Methylmercury and Ethylmercury Analytical Performance in SRR Samples Measured by SRNL and Eurofins Frontier Global Sciences

Existing models and simulants of tank disposition media at the Savannah River Site (SRS) have presumed the presence of high concentrations of inorganic mercury. However, quarterly Tank 50 analyses have shown that mercury is present as organomercurial species at concentrations that may present challenges to its remediation and disposition and may challenge the Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) for Saltstone. Todate, methylmercury analyses for Savannah River Remediation (SRR) have been performed at an off-site laboratory by Eurofins Frontier Global Sciences (FGS) in Bothell, WA. Savannah River Remediation requested the development of methylmercury and ethylmercury determination capabilities at the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) to support the Liquid Waste Operations at SRS. As part of that method development, SRR requested that SRNL Analytical Development (AD) compare their results with those obtained from their outside contract laboratory, Eurofins FGS. This document reports on this method development work as well as the comparative analyses conducted between the two laboratories. A series of optimization and validation experiments has been performed at SRNL, which has resulted in the development of on-site methylmercury and ethylmercury speciation capabilities using purge and trap (P&T) gas chromatography (GC) coupled with thermal desorption (TD) cold vapor – atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (CVAFS). Speciation has been achieved for both species, with a methylmercury method reporting limit (MRL) value of 1.13 pg and an overall uncertainty (1σ) of 5.1%. An ethylmercury MRL of 11.5 pg and an overall uncertainty (1σ) of 4.8% were obtained. These analytical parameters compare favorably with Eurofins FGS, which demonstrates uncertainties (1σ) for methylmercury and ethylmercury of 13% and 9.1%, respectively. Results obtained by SRNL from the routine analysis of Tanks 21, 40, 50, and 51 samples have provided statistically indistinguishable results compared with Eurofins FGS. Based upon the work performed by SRNL-AD and the data currently available, the following recommendations can be made: Further work should be performed to determine a “best practices” for sample holding time prior to analysis (both preserved and non-preserved samples), as well as any detrimental effects sample age may have on data quality. Analysis of ethylmercury is only recommended for tank samples that are reasonably expected to have significant quantities of ethylmercury, such as from the DWPF SMECT. Trace levels of ethylmercury in the presence of large quantities of methylmercury can be difficult or impossible to quantify. SRNL-AD development of methods for total mercury, purgeable mercury (which includes Hg(0) and dimethylmercury), inorganic mercury (Hg(I) and Hg(II)), dissolved mercury, and particulate mercury are underway and will be reported upon separately.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗