Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Ehlert, Steven

Publications and source records attributed to Ehlert, Steven.

Modeling Meteoroid Densities for Spacecraft Risk Assessment

Densities are a key driver of risk posed to spacecraft by the meteoroid environment. MEM 3 has incorporated a density distribution that utilizes measurements of 92 events. Densities are extremely difficult to measure. Greater need than ever for high resolution meteor imagery to break degeneracies.

Ehlert, Steven↗

Modeling Meteoroid Densities for Spacecraft Risk Assessment

This report describes the methodologies and algorithms that NASA’s Meteoroid Environment Office (MEO) currently utilizes to measure meteoroid densities. We discuss the needs for an accurate model for the meteoroid density distribution in its Meteoroid Engineering Model (MEM), and its potential implications for spacecraft design. The recently developed process is heavily derived from that of previous work, although subtle differences exist. A thorough comparison of the best-fit densities derived for sixty meteoroids in and with the process described here shows that discrepancies in final densities larger than a factor of two are measured for ∼ 20% of our test events. Such a level of discrepancy suggests that any density calculated using similar methods cannot be assumed to represent a unique fit to the data. Additional observational data for meteoroids beyond those utilized in this work will be essential for producing more reliable and repeatable density measurements.

Ehlert, Steven↗

Modeling Meteor Flares for Spacecraft Safety

NASA's Meteoroid Environment Office (MEO) is tasked with assisting spacecraft operators and engineers in quantifying the threat the meteoroid environment poses to their individual missions. A more complete understanding of the meteoroid environment for this application requires extensive observations. One manner by which the MEO observes meteors is with dedicated video camera systems that operate nightly. Connecting the observational data from these video cameras to the relevant physical properties of the ablating meteoroids, however, is subject to sizable observational and theoretical uncertainties. Arguably the most troublesome theoretical uncertainty in ablation is a model for the structure of meteoroids, as observations clearly show behaviors wholly inconsistent with meteoroids being homogeneous spheres. Further complicating the interpretation of the observations in the context of spacecraft risk is the ubiquitous process of fragmentation and the flares it can produce, which greatly muddles any attempts to estimating initial meteoroid masses. In this talk a method of estimating the mass distribution of fragments in flaring meteors using high resolution video observations will be dis- cussed. Such measurements provide an important step in better understanding of the structure and fragmentation process of the parent meteoroids producing these flares, which in turn may lead to better constraints on meteoroid masses and reduced uncertainties in spacecraft risk.

Ehlert, Steven↗

Improving Photometric Calibration of Meteor Video Camera Systems

We present the results of new calibration tests performed by the NASA Meteoroid Environment Oce (MEO) designed to help quantify and minimize systematic uncertainties in meteor photometry from video camera observations. These systematic uncertainties can be categorized by two main sources: an imperfect understanding of the linearity correction for the MEO's Watec 902H2 Ultimate video cameras and uncertainties in meteor magnitudes arising from transformations between the Watec camera's Sony EX-View HAD bandpass and the bandpasses used to determine reference star magnitudes. To address the rst point, we have measured the linearity response of the MEO's standard meteor video cameras using two independent laboratory tests on eight cameras. Our empirically determined linearity correction is critical for performing accurate photometry at low camera intensity levels. With regards to the second point, we have calculated synthetic magnitudes in the EX bandpass for reference stars. These synthetic magnitudes enable direct calculations of the meteor's photometric ux within the camera band-pass without requiring any assumptions of its spectral energy distribution. Systematic uncertainties in the synthetic magnitudes of individual reference stars are estimated at 0:20 mag, and are limited by the available spectral information in the reference catalogs. These two improvements allow for zero-points accurate to 0:05 􀀀 0:10 mag in both ltered and un ltered camera observations with no evidence for lingering systematics.

Ehlert, Steven↗

Improving Photometric Calibration of Meteor Video Camera Systems

Current optical observations of meteors are commonly limited by systematic uncertainties in photometric calibration at the level of approximately 0.5 mag or higher. Future improvements to meteor ablation models, luminous efficiency models, or emission spectra will hinge on new camera systems and techniques that significantly reduce calibration uncertainties and can reliably perform absolute photometric measurements of meteors. In this talk we discuss the algorithms and tests that NASA's Meteoroid Environment Office (MEO) has developed to better calibrate photometric measurements for the existing All-Sky and Wide-Field video camera networks as well as for a newly deployed four-camera system for measuring meteor colors in Johnson-Cousins BV RI filters. In particular we will emphasize how the MEO has been able to address two long-standing concerns with the traditional procedure, discussed in more detail below.

Ehlert, Steven↗

New Lightcurves of 1027 Aesculapia and 3395 Jitka

We present new measurements for the rotation periods of two near Earth asteroids: 1027 Aesculapia and 3395 Jitka, the latter of which has been measured for the first time. Our measured period for 1027 Aesculapia is 9.79 +/- 0.01 h and amplitude of 0.09 mag, which is inconsistent with the previously published measurement of 6.83 +/- 0.10 h. The origin of this discrepancy is uncertain. We measure the period of 3395 Jitka to be 9.12 +/- 0.02 h with an amplitude of A= 0.42 mag.

Ehlert, Steven↗