Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Ellsworth, Joel C.

Publications and source records attributed to Ellsworth, Joel C..

Dynamic Leading-Edge Stagnation Point Determination Utilizing an Array of Hot-Film Sensors with Unknown Calibration

During flight-testing of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Gulfstream III (G-III) airplane (Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Savannah, Georgia) SubsoniC Research Aircraft Testbed (SCRAT) between March 2013 and April 2015 it became evident that the sensor array used for stagnation point detection was not functioning as expected. The stagnation point detection system is a self calibrating hot-film array; the calibration was unknown and varied between flights, however, the channel with the lowest power consumption was expected to correspond with the point of least surface shear. While individual channels showed the expected behavior for the hot-film sensors, more often than not the lowest power consumption occurred at a single sensor (despite in-flight maneuvering) in the array located far from the expected stagnation point. An algorithm was developed to process the available system output and determine the stagnation point location. After multiple updates and refinements, the final algorithm was not sensitive to the failure of a single sensor in the array, but adjacent failures beneath the stagnation point crippled the algorithm.

aerodynamic characteristics↗

Aerodynamic Flight-Test Results for the Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge

The aerodynamic effects of compliant flaps installed onto a modified Gulfstream III airplane were investigated. Analyses were performed prior to flight to predict the aerodynamic effects of the flap installation. Flight tests were conducted to gather both structural and aerodynamic data. The airplane was instrumented to collect vehicle aerodynamic data and wing pressure data. A leading-edge stagnation detection system was also installed. The data from these flights were analyzed and compared with predictions. The predictive tools compared well with flight data for small flap deflections, but differences between predictions and flight estimates were greater at larger deflections. This paper describes the methods used to examine the aerodynamics data from the flight tests and provides a discussion of the flight-test results in the areas of vehicle aerodynamics, wing sectional pressure coefficient profiles, and air data.

aerodynamics↗

An Analytical Explanation for the X-43A Flush Air Data Sensing System Pressure Mismatch Between Flight and Theory

Following the successful Mach 7 flight test of the X-43A, unexpectedly low pressures were measured by the aft set of the onboard Flush Air Data Sensing System s pressure ports. These in-flight aft port readings were significantly lower below Mach 3.5 than was predicted by theory. The same lower readings were also seen in the Mach 10 flight of the X-43A and in wind-tunnel data. The pre-flight predictions were developed based on 2-dimensional wedge flow, which fails to predict some of the significant 3-dimensional flow features in this geometry at lower Mach numbers. Using Volterra s solution to the wave equation as a starting point, a three-dimensional finite wedge approximation to flow over the X-43A forebody is presented. The surface pressures from this approximation compare favorably with the measured wind tunnel and flight data at speeds of Mach 2.5 and 3.

Ellsworth, Joel C.↗