Erin Tesny | Search NASA

NASA NTRS2023

Thermal Desktop Modeling of the RRM3 On-Orbit Cryogenic Methane Storage and Active Cooling Experiment

The storing of cryogenic propellants is an enabling technology for NASA as it moves to expand future missions into low Earth orbit (LEO) and beyond. The Robotic Refueling Mission–3 (RRM3) experiment launched in 2018 and was designed to demonstrate tank self-pressurization during storage and active cooling of liquid methane in microgravity. Creating accurate models using existing datasets from flight experiments such as RRM3 is a vital step toward developing appropriate modeling tools to form pre-test predictions for future flight systems. The goal of this work was to create a working model in Thermal Desktop of the RRM3 source Dewar during the microgravity self-pressurization experiment. The pressure rise, temperature distribution of the fluid inside the tank, and the wall temperatures were all tracked and compared with test data. Initial results show good agreement between each of these metrics and the experimental results. This work is ongoing and will yield further insights into the thermal behavior of cryogens in microgravity.

Tank self-pressurization↗

NASA NTRS2023

Thermal Desktop Modeling of the 2016 CRYOTE-2 Tank Chill and Fill Tests

The storing and transfer of cryogenic propellants is an enabling technology for NASA as it moves to expand future missions into low Earth orbit (LEO) and beyond. The transfer of cryogenic propellants is of particular interest because it has never been successfully demonstrated in microgravity. Several ground tests have been conducted in past decades examining various tank chilldown and fill methods. Creating accurate models using these historical datasets is a vital step toward developing appropriate modeling tools to form pre-test predictions for eventual flight and ground tests of various novel injector concepts. The goal of this work was to create a working model in Thermal Desktop using data from the CRYOTE-2 experiments whose purpose was to demonstrate the chill and fill process in a spherical receiver tank parametrically examining the effect of injection method, receiver tank initial wall temperature and initial state, supply pressure, and mass flow rate on the NVF process. These tests were conducting using liquid nitrogen with different injectors with different injection patterns. The focus of the current work is on one particular spray nozzle. The pressure rise inside the tank, the fill level, and the change in the outside wall temperature were all tracked and compared with test data. The Thermal Desktop model was able to accurately predict each of these metrics for this nozzle within 11.0%, 22.0%, and 7.0%, respectively.

Cryogenic Tank Chilldown↗

NASA NTRS2023

Validation of Universal Cryogenic Flow Boiling Correlations in Thermal Desktop for Liquid Helium

Understanding two-phase cryogenic propellant behavior is key to enabling technologies for future spaceflight missions. Developing accurate models of two-phase flow phenomena, particularly flow boiling in the heating configuration is relevant to the propellant transfer process both in microgravity and on other planetary surfaces. Currently there is a need for more accurate, direct cryogenic data anchored models for various boiling phenomena. Recently, universal correlations for cryogens flowing in heated tubes have been developed for a wide variety of fluids, thermodynamic conditions, and various regimes across the boiling curve, and have been patched to provide a smooth, continuous predictive curve. This paper demonstrates how these correlations have been ported into Thermal Desktop to improve predictive performance. To test the validity of the new correlations, Thermal Desktop is validated against a historical dataset of flow boiling experiments in the heating configuration using liquid helium. Based on results, the new correlations show a substantial improvement over the original built-in flow boiling correlations in Thermal Desktop in predicting the wall temperature as a function of preponderant parameters for this quantum fluid.

cryogenic propellant transfer↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Progress on the Reduced Gravity Cryogenic Transfer (RGCT) Project

Reduced gravity transfer of cryogenic propellants is crucial to being able to perform planned extended-duration space exploration missions. However, the transfer of cryogenic propellants under reduced gravity conditions has never been demonstrated in a mass-efficient fashion. Efficient cryogenic fluid transfer methods will reduce the transfer time or amount of propellant consumed for chilldown of transfer lines and tanks and ensure successful engine restart or fill of a customer receiver tank. The purpose of the Reduced Gravity Cryogenic Transfer (RGCT) project is to enhance line chilldown, tank chilldown, and tank fill/transfer in a reduced gravity environment through (1) ground and reduced gravity cryogenic testing and (2) numerical model development and validation, which includes empirical, lumped capacitance, and computational fluid dynamics modeling. Technologies developed, data gathered, and models developed and validated under RGCT have played a critical role in enabling longer duration in-space missions. This presentation will provide a description of the ongoing cryogenic propellant transfer ground and reduced gravity testing, numerical modeling, and technology development to-date.

Boiling↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Universal Cryogenic Flow Boiling Correlations in Thermal Desktop for Liquid Helium

Understanding two-phase cryogenic propellant behavior is key to enabling technologies for future spaceflight missions. Developing accurate models of two-phase flow phenomena, particularly in the current work, flow boiling in the heating configuration, is relevant to the propellant transfer process both in 1-g and microgravity. Currently there is a need for more accurate, direct cryogenic data anchored models for various boiling phenomena. Recently, universal correlations for cryogens flowing in heated tubes have been developed for a wide variety of fluids, thermodynamic conditions, and various regimes across the boiling curve, and have been patched to provide a smooth, continuous predictive curve. This paper describes implementation and validation of these correlations into Thermal Desktop to improve predictive performance, with a focus on liquid helium. Results from Thermal Desktop using both the built-in and new correlations are validated against a historical dataset of flow boiling experiments in the heating configuration using liquid helium. Based on results, the new correlations show a substantial improvement over the original built-in flow boiling correlations in Thermal Desktop in predicting the wall temperature as a function of preponderant parameters for this quantum fluid at temperatures greater than the lambda temperature, T λ = 2.17K.

cryogenic propellant transfer↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Thermal Desktop Modeling of 2016 CRYOTE-2 Tank Chill and Fill Testing

The storing and transfer of cryogenic propellants is an enabling technology for NASA and industry as civilization moves to expand future missions into low Earth orbit and beyond. Several ground propellant transfer tests have been conducted in past decades examining various tank chilldown and fill methods. Creating accurate models using these historical datasets is a vital step toward developing appropriate modeling tools to form pre-test predictions for subsequent ground and flight propellant transfers. This paper presents model validation of Thermal Desktop using data from the 2016 CRYOTE-2 liquid nitrogen transfer experiments whose purpose was to demonstrate the chill and fill process in a spherical receiver tank. Tank pressure, fill level, and wall temperature were all modeled and compared with 8 test cases using two modeling methods, Mass Controlled, and Pressure Controlled. This test series is the hardest Thermal Desktop tank chill and fill validation case to-date, yet the model was able to accurately predict each of these metrics for the 2016 tests within 28%, 10%, 20% respectively, for pressure, fill level, and wall temperature using the Mass Controlled model, and 29%, 79%, and 12%, respectively for the Pressure Controlled model.

Cryogenic Tank Chilldown↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Universal Cryogenic Flow Boiling Correlations in Thermal Desktop for Liquid Methane and Liquid Nitrogen

Future in-space cryogenic architectures will depend on the ability to accurately model various stages of cryogenic propellant transfer and storage. Currently there is a need for more accurate, direct cryogenic data-anchored models for various boiling phenomena. This paper presents the implementation and validation of recently developed universal cryogenic flow boiling correlations for saturated flow boiling heat transfer coefficients (HTC) and critical heat flux (CHF) into the Thermal Desktop (SINDA/FLUINT) modeling software. The correlations are validated against steady state cryogenic flow boiling historical heated tube cases from liquid nitrogen and liquid methane experiments covering a wide range of inlet conditions, mass flux, and heat flux. Overall, Thermal Desktop with the new universal cryogenic flow boiling correlations demonstrates significant improvement in predictive performance for both wall temperature and CHF location compared to the Thermal Desktop model with built-in correlations when both are compared to the data.

Mariano Mercado↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Universal Cryogenic Flow Boiling Correlations in Thermal Desktop for Liquid Hydrogen

Developing accurate models of two-phase cryogenic flow will reduce risk and reduce margins for future NASA vehicles such as the Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system. Currently there is a need for more accurate, direct cryogenic data-anchored models for various boiling and two-phase phenomena. The focus of the current work is on modeling steady state cryogenic flow boiling in the transfer line that connects a propellant storage tank to an engine or customer receiver tank. This paper presents Thermal Desktop model validation results against several historical liquid hydrogen (LH2) heated tube experiments that cover a wide range of inlet conditions, mass flux, and heat flux. New universal cryogenic flow boiling correlations were recently developed and anchored to the largest cryogenic flow boiling database assembled in the world to-date. The new universal correlations are patched together and implemented into Thermal Desktop to compare model performance against the built-in flow boiling correlations. Axial wall temperature predictions as a function of preponderant parameters like heat flux, mass flux, inlet pressure, inlet quality, tube diameter, etc. using the two sets of flow boiling correlations are compared against the experimental data. Overall, the Thermal Desktop model with the new universal cryogenic flow boiling correlations demonstrates an improvement in predictive performance over the Thermal Desktop model using built-in correlations for both wall temperature and location of critical heat flux compared to the data for LH2 flow boiling in heated tubes.

Cryogenic Propellant Transfer↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Universal Cryogenic Flow Boiling Correlations in Thermal Desktop for Liquid Hydrogen

Developing accurate models of two-phase cryogenic flow will reduce risk and reduce margins for future NASA vehicles such as the Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system. Currently there is a need for more accurate, direct cryogenic data-anchored models for various boiling and two-phase phenomena. The focus of the current work is on modeling steady state cryogenic flow boiling in the transfer line that connects a propellant storage tank to an engine or customer receiver tank. This paper presents Thermal Desktop model validation results against several historical liquid hydrogen (LH2) heated tube experiments that cover a wide range of inlet conditions, mass flux, and heat flux. New universal cryogenic flow boiling correlations were recently developed and anchored to the largest cryogenic flow boiling database assembled in the world to-date. The new universal correlations are patched together and implemented into Thermal Desktop to compare model performance against the built-in flow boiling correlations. Axial wall temperature predictions as a function of preponderant parameters like heat flux, mass flux, inlet pressure, inlet quality, tube diameter, etc. using the two sets of flow boiling correlations are compared against the experimental data. Overall, the Thermal Desktop model with the new universal cryogenic flow boiling correlations demonstrates an improvement in predictive performance over the Thermal Desktop model using built-in correlations for both wall temperature and location of critical heat flux compared to the data for LH2 flow boiling in heated tubes.

cryogenic propellant transfer↗