Evan T Dill | Search NASA

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Improvements to GNSS Positioning in Challenging Environments by 3DMA Lidar Informed Selective Satellites Usage

The use of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) for position estimation tends to yield poor results when operating inside of an urban canyon due to large obstructions (e.g., buildings) that disrupt signals as they travel from a satellite to a receiver resulting in a position estimate that may significantly fluctuate in magnitude and direction. Identifying and removing signals that are non-line-of-sight (NLOS) to the receiver and only using signals that are line-of-sight (LOS) can improve the estimated position. However, quickly and accurately determining the LOS status of each measurement can be challenging without additional information about the operating environment. Use of publicly available lidar data can be used to incorporate techniques, such as 3D-mapping-aided (3DMA), to estimate the LOS status of satellites and augment the position solution accordingly. To complicate the issue, the error on the GNSS position estimate in an urban canyon is often so large that is it not sufficient to use as an approximate location for LOS prediction. That is, at times the calculated GNSS solution is not representative of the true location and cannot be used to accurately predict which satellites are within LOS due to the difference in the physical geometry associated with the two locations. This paper explores the use of a GNSS/inertial fused position solution as the initial position estimate for predicting which satellites are within LOS in an urban environment and the impact that removal of predicted NLOS satellites has on the GNSS position solution.

GPS↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Testing a Run-Time Assurance Framework Coupled with Integrated Risk Mitigation Capabilities for Autonomous Urban UAS Flights

The In-Time Aviation Safety Management System (IASMS) Concept of Operations (ConOps) envisions new capabilities to monitor, assess, and mitigate flight safety risks. Systems will be tailored to mission type, vehicle/equipage type, operational environment, and safety risk tolerance. Within an IASMS framework, several capabilities may be implemented spanning three operational phases (pre-flight, in-flight, and post-flight/off-line); and consisting of lower level functions and information services which may reside onboard the aircraft, on third-party server(s), and/or on ground/operator station(s). Each capability will be designed to produce and disseminate safety-relevant information; perform detection, diagnosis, and prediction of unsafe situations; and/or execute mitigation actions when hazardous events warrant such changes. This paper focuses on recent testing of airborne capabilities that demonstrate inflight aspects of the overarching concept for autonomous unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) operations in urban environments. A flight test architecture is described that applies run-time assurance principles (e.g., executes independent of the unassured autopilot), real-time risk assessment, and a technique to execute contingencies if necessary either automatically or via pilot intervention. Several tests using small UAS were conducted to verify the assured in-flight risk mitigation capability. The paper draws significantly from a larger NASA technical report and recent prior conference papers, providing additional details. Data is analyzed for two representative flights to illustrate the performance for various sequential and simultaneous hazards used during testing. During each automated flight, several hazards are encountered at various points along the flight path. At each point, the hazard is mitigated by the system, with the vehicle then continuing to subsequent points. The paper concludes with lessons-learned regarding relevant aspects of the overarching IASMS concept and how it may be updated and further advanced in the future.

population activity↗