Phosphates on Mars and Their Importance as Igneous, Aqueous, and Astrobiological Indicators
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
E. M. Hausrath↗
Engineering topics
F. M. McCubbin
Publications and source records attributed to F. M. McCubbin.
Investigating the Physical Modification of the Bennu Sample During Entry, Descent, and Landing
On September 24, 2023, the OSIRIS-REx Sample Return Capsule (SRC) entered Earth’s atmosphere and landed in the Utah Test and Training Range (UTTR). Preliminary examination of the returned Bennu sample has confirmed that OSIRIS-REx sample mass exceeds the mission requirement of 60 g of material. The sample consists of particles that range from a few centimeters to microscopic fines. During the SRC’s entry, descent, and landing (EDL) sequence, it may have experienced (i) peak decelerations of 10s of g (ii) tumbling, and (iii) touchdown at approximately 10 m/s, which could have induced physical modification of the sample. In addition, the act of sampling may have altered or biased the physical properties of the collected materials. Here, we investigate the likelihood and extent of physical modification of the sample between collection and return using observations and modeling. This work addresses the mission’s hypothesis 12, which concerns, in part, the modification of the sample during collection and Earth entry.
asteroid↗
Petrological Traverse of the Olivine Cumulate Séítah Formation at Jezero Crater, Mars: A Perspective From SuperCam Onboard Perseverance
Séítah is the stratigraphically lowest formation visited by Perseverance in the Jezero crater floor. We present the data obtained by SuperCam: texture by imagery, chemistry by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy, and mineralogy by Supercam Visible and Infrared reflectance and Raman spectroscopy. The Séítah formation consists of igneous, weakly altered rocks dominated by millimeter-sized grains of olivine with the presence of low-Ca and high-Ca pyroxenes, and other primary minerals (e.g., plagioclase, Cr-Fe-Ti oxides, phosphates). Along a ∼140 m long section in Séítah, SuperCam analyses showed evidence of geochemical and mineralogical variations, from the contact with the overlying Máaz formation, going deeper in the formation. Bulk rock and olivine Mg#, grain size, olivine content increase gradually further from the contact. Along the section, olivine Mg# is not in equilibrium with the bulk rock Mg#, indicating local olivine accumulation. These observations are consistent with Séítah being the deep ultramafic member of a cumulate series derived from the fractional crystallization and slow cooling of the parent magma at depth. Possible magmatic processes and exhumation mechanisms of Séítah are discussed. Séítah rocks show some affinity with some rocks at Gusev crater, and with some Martian meteorites suggesting that such rocks are not rare on the surface of Mars. Séítah is part of the Nili Fossae regional olivine-carbonate unit observed from orbit. Future exploration of Perseverance on the rim and outside of the crater will help determine if the observations from the crater floor can be extrapolated to the whole unit or if this unit is composed of distinct sub-units with various origins.
Mars 2020↗
An olivine cumulate outcrop on the floor of Jezero crater, Mars
The geological units on the floor of Jezero crater, Mars, are part of a wider regional stratigraphy of olivine-rich rocks, which extends well beyond the crater. We investigate the petrology of olivine and carbonate-bearing rocks of the Séítah formation in the floor of Jezero. Using multispectral images and x-ray fluorescence data, acquired by the Perseverance rover, we performed a petrographic analysis of the Bastide and Brac outcrops within this unit. We find that these outcrops are composed of igneous rock, moderately altered by aqueous fluid. The igneous rocks are mainly made of coarse-grained olivine, similar to some Martian meteorites. We interpret them as an olivine cumulate, formed by settling and enrichment of olivine through multi-stage cooling of a thick magma body.
Mars↗
From Apollo to Artemis: Opening and Processing Lunar Core 73002 for the ANGSA Program
The Apollo mission returned 382 kg of lunar material comprising rock, soil and core samples. Some of these samples were intentionally set aside after their return from the Moon for future study, including samples sealed on the lunar surface, frozen samples and samples stored under Helium. The Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA) program was established to study thesesamples, in part to help bridge the gap between Apollo and the next generation of lunar science and exploration.Apollo 17 double drive tube core sample 73001/73002 was collected about 50 meters east of Lara Crater from a landslide deposit originating from South Massif. After separating the two halves, the lower drive tube 73001 was immediately sealed in a special vacuum container. Both drive tubes were then placed in an Apollo Lunar Sample Return Container (ALSRC) and returned to Earth under vacuum. Total sample weight and length of 73001/73002 is 1263.0 g and up to 60 cm, with the upper drive 73002 containing 429.7 g and 23 cm of material ( which was then compressed to 18.5 cm during extrusion in the lab). We will present the meticulous methods involved in preparing for, opening and processing lunar core 73002, the upper half of the double drive tube. This includes searching and locating procedures and tools, practicing assembly and extrusion in a mock-up, and finally opening and dissecting the core sample 73002. Challenges (both expected and unexpected) encountered along the way and lessons learned during this project will help pave the way towards improving future lunar sample return missions and advancing insight into the Moon’s history
C. H. Krysher↗
Recovery Rate is an Improved Metric for Monitoring Bioburden in Cleanrooms
The Astromaterials Acquisition and Curation Office maintains seven cleanrooms for curating extraterrestrial samples from a variety of sample return missions. These cleanrooms are monitored for inorganic and particulate contamination and are maintained at ISO 7 to ISO 4 equivalent standards as dictated by collection requirements. As part of the advanced curation effort and to prepare for future sample collections from carbonaceous asteroids and eventually Mars we have begun monitoring the microbiology of these cleanrooms. Insights gained from monitoring these labs can be applied to improving planetary protection efforts.
Planetary Protection↗
Revisiting the Origin of Macromolecular Carbon (MMC) in Lunar Basalts 15556 & 10044
Volatile elements influence the geo-chemical evolution of planetary bodies and they are in magmas at every stage, from melting within planetary interiors to eruption at the surface. Analyses of lunar mare basalts supported the hypothesis that lunar mag-mas were depleted in volatiles (H-C-F-Cl-S), relative to their terrestrial analogs [1]. Nevertheless, several early studies of samples returned during the Apollo program proposed that the mare basalt eruptions, including the “fire fountain” eruptions, were propelled by the oxidation of magmatic graphite to CO (and/or CO2) gas [2, 3]. Seminal studies during the 1970’s measured the bulk concentration and isotopic compositions of C from Apollo 11 samples, and identified several carbonaceous compounds, including: (a) gaseous (CO, CO2, and traces of CH4), (b) metallic carbide, and (c) potentially elemental carbon [4-6]. These studies reported a relatively broad range of C contents (~100-400 μg/g) and isotopic values (δC13 = -30 to +20), and suggested that these heterogeneities can be explained by contribution from multiple factors, including: (a) indigenous carbon, (b) solar wind implantation, (c) bombardment and/or meteorite impact, and (d) terrestrial contamination [5,6]. However, unequivocal observations of magmatic graphite in lunar basalts have never been made. Macromolecular carbon (MMC)—graphitic carbon varying from nearly amorphous to highly crystalline varieties—was identified as inclusions hosted by igneous pyroxenes from Martian meteorites and were attributed to being indigenous to Mars [8]. The authors carefully considered the textural and mineralogical relationship of the MMC phases, and concluded that the subset of MMC located within and/or adjacent to cracks, or at a disrupted surface (e.g., cut) were most consistent with terrestrial contamination. The near absence of con-firmed instances of lunar magmatic MMC within the literature [9], combined with the wide range of isotopic values and bulk carbon contents measured in lunar bas-alts begs the question as to whether previously measured carbon is of an indigenous origin, or the result of terrestrial contamination. Using Raman spectroscopy, we have observed MMC in lunar basalts subjected to different forms of anthropogenic modification related to sample preparation including polished sections, sawn surfaces, and fractured surfaces adjacent to sawn sur-faces. We have observed MMC of unknown origin in all of these settings. Here we report the preliminary textural and spectroscopic characteristics of MMC hosted within the groundmass of Apollo 15 (15556) and Apollo 11 basalts (10044) as part of our ongoing investigation of the origin of these carbonaceous materials.
lunar↗
A METHOD TO REDUCE BIOBURDEN IN ASTROMATERIALS CURATION FACILITIES WITHOUT INTRODUCING UNWANTED CONTAMINATION
Introduction: NASA curates its Astromaterials collections in cleanrooms that are carefully monitored for particulate, inorganic and trace metal contamination. Current sample collections are not particularly susceptible to organic contamination or biological alteration. However, new collections like those from the OSIRIS-REx and Hayabusa2 missions will have organic contamination requirements and are susceptible to biodegradation. It will be necessary sterilize or at least disinfect curation labs, as well as tools and equipment in a manner that does not introduce additional contamination and does not affect the samples 1. Current curation cleaning procedures utilize isopropyl alcohol which offers some bioburden reduction, but is not effective against spore-forming bacteria or fungal spores 2. We present a modified disinfection method that uses ultrapure hydrogen peroxide to reduce bioburden inside curation labs and glove boxes without introducing contamination or damaging curation equipment. We tested this method in the meteorite processing lab as well as on a glovebox being cleaned for use in processing ANGSA (Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis) samples and present the results of those tests. We discuss the limitations of this method and describe potential situations in which it will not be applicable. The CDC guidelines for disinfection andsterilization in healthcare facilities discusses over 15different methods for reducing bioburden in hospitalsettings 3. The most common method, steamsterilization, is well suited to sterilizing curationprocessing tools but cannot easily be used to sterilizecleanroom surfaces or large equipment likegloveboxes. Chemical sterilization with bleach(NaOCl) is also a common strategy in healthcare andpharmaceutical settings that presents materialcompatibility issues as well as serious inorganiccontamination concerns for curation facilities.Introducing a new source of Na and Cl into curationlabs is not acceptable. Other chemical methods likeethylene oxide, formaldehyde, iodophors andquaternary ammonium compounds could introduceorganic and inorganic contamination. We chose tofocus on hydrogen peroxide because it is generallycompatible with commonly used curation materialslike stainless steel, aluminum and Teflon and becauseit decomposes to oxygen and water. The CDCguidelines for hydrogen peroxide specify using a 7.5wt% solution at 25 ̊C with a contact time of 30 minutesfor high level disinfection and 6 hours for sterilization.High level disinfection is defined as a technique thatwill kill all microorganisms except large numbers ofbacterial spores 3. Methods: We prepared a solution of 7.5 wt%hydrogen peroxide from a stock solution of ultrapure30 wt% peroxide (JT Baker) and curation gradeultrapure water. This ultrapure water is already used incuration cleaning procedures and thus is not consideredand additional source of contamination. We conducteda materials compatibility test by exposing unanodizedand anodized 6061 T6 Al alloy to the peroxide solutionfor up to six hours and periodically inspecting thesurfaces for visible defects. We used this peroxide todisinfect the floor of the meteorite processing lab andthe interior of a curation glovebox by exposing thesesurfaces to the peroxide solution for 30 min. Thesurfaces were swabbed with a dry macrofoam swabbefore (Puritan Brand 2518051PFRNDFD) and afterperoxide treatment to collect microbes present on thesurfaces. Microbes were extracted by sonication fromthe swab into 15 ml of PBS (phosphate buffered saline)and inoculated onto the following media: TSA (trypticsoy agar) BA (blood agar), R2A (Reasoners 2 agar),Potato Dextrose Agar, Saboraud Dextrose Agar andSaboraud Dextrose Agar with 0.1 mg/ mlchloramphenicol. Four TSA plates and two BA plateswere inoculated with 0.1 ml of PBS each andincubated at 35 and 37 for 48 hours. Two R2A°C°Cplates (0.1 ml of PBS each) were incubated at 25 .°CThe remaining plates were inoculated with 0.2ml ofPBS and incubated at 30 ̊C for seven days. Afterincubation bacterial and fungal isolates were countedand transferred to new plates for identification usingthe VITEK24 automated system or by sequencing aportion of the barcode gene (16S rRNA for bacteria,small subunit gene for fungi) on an ABI 3500 Sangersequencer. Negative controls consisted of swabs thatwere opened in the sampling environment andanalyzed alongside the experimental samples.Results: A 6 hour exposure to hydrogen peroxideresulted in visible pitting on un-anodized 6061 Al, butnot on anodized surfaces. No visible pitting occurredafter a 30 minute exposure. Therefore, we decided tolimit our experimental tests to 30 min. exposures. 17bacterial CFU (colony forming units) representing 4distinct organisms were isolated from the meteorite processing lab floor prior to hydrogen peroxidetreatment. We were unable culture any organisms afterperoxide treatment. In the glovebox we were able toculture three bacterial CFU representing three distinctspecies, including a spore forming bacterium prior todisinfection with peroxide. After the peroxidetreatment we were unable to culture any organisms.Routine monitoring of the meteorite processing lab andthe glovebox did not indicate any increase in unwantedinorganic contamination after these peroxidetreatments. Discussion: A 30 minute treatment with 7.5 wt%peroxide appears to be an effective method forreducing bioburden on typical cleanroom surfaces. Themethod does not introduce unwanted organic orinorganic contamination and is compatible withcommonly used curation materials like stainless steel,Teflon and anodized aluminum alloys. Special careshould be taken with un-anodized aluminum.Prolonged exposure to hydrogen peroxide can causepitting on this material. We recommend using thismethod to disinfect curation labs and equipment whenbiological alteration is a concern. This method iseffective at room temperature and cannot be used todisinfect labs and equipment where the ambienttemperature is < 0 ̊C. Astromaterials samples shouldbe removed from the area where disinfection is tooccur. Hydrogen peroxide is a powerful oxidizingagent and will react with any organic carbon present inthe sample. References: [1.] Mccubbin, F. M. et al.Sp. Sci Rev(2019) doi:10.1007/s11214-019-0615-9. [2.] Mogul, R.et al.Astrobiology 18, ast.2017.1814 (2018). [3.]Rutala, W. A. & Weber, D. J. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008. [4.] Pincus, D. H. in Encyclopedia of Rapid Microbiological Methods (2005).
A. B. Regberg↗
Mars Sample Return Science Planning Group Phase 2 (MSPG2): Overview & Interim Report
Mars Sample Return (MSR) has been a high priority of the international planetary science community for decades. In recent years, significant programmatic advances have brought MSR closer to becoming a reality. In 2018, NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) signed a joint Statement of Intent to continue defining respective roles and responsibilities in the flight missions required to realize MSR. In October 2020, NASA and ESA formalized this partnership with the signature of a Memorandum of Understanding for the MSR flight elements. The MSR campaign consists of M2020, two MSR flight elements and the ground-based infrastructure to receive, handle and curate the samples from Mars. In an engineering sense, MSR consists of a linked set of missions, and a concluding set of ground-based activities, that we refer to as the MSR Campaign.
G. Kminek↗
Preliminary Examination Process of Apollo Core 73002 - Insights and Lessons Learned From ANGSA for Future Sample Return Missions
Apollo Sample 73002 is part of a 2-foot long “drive tube” (73001/73002) of regolith that was collected from a landslide deposit near Lara Crater at the Apollo 17 site, Station 3. The double drive tube is believed to have penetrated a lunar landslide deposit that was transported from the slope of the South Massif into the TLV [1]. As part of the ANGSA (Apollo Next Generation Sample Analyses) initiative, preparing preliminary examination (PE) catalog of 73002 is a crucial first step for the early identification of material types such as rock fragments, and potential stratigraphy within the core. PE of Apollo core 73002 is distinct from science activities with the main goal to produces a sample catalog with a level of detail about sample characterization that is sufficient for the ANGSA PIs (and later on the lunar sample community) to select and request the samples to conduct their individual, scientific studies. Ultimately, the PE catalog of 73002 will help to establish a better understanding of the stratigraphy of the land slide deposit; the processes of the landslide including the trigger(s) and possibly number of landslide events, as well as the role of volatiles [1] and will aid in the careful preservation of the material for future studies [2].
Apollo↗
Processing Frozen Apollo Samples in a Nitrogen Environment
A few weeks after their return to Earth, several Apollo 17 regolith sample splits and one Apollo 17 basalt were frozen at -20˚C (under dry gaseous N2 like all other pristine Apollo samples), and have remained essentially unstudied within the Apollo sample collection at NASA’s Johnson Space Center (JSC). As part of the Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA) project, these frozen samples were selected for consortium study in 2019. Although the samples themselves were kept at -20˚C for nearly 50 years, the JSC Curation office has lacked a facility for processing frozen samples under pristine Apollo processing conditions. A temporary lab for this work was designed, built, and tested. Procedures were then developed for working in this unique environment, and the facility was sucessfully used to process the frozen Apollo samples for scientific allocation.
ANGSA↗
Volatile Abundances of Apatite in CK and R Chondrites: Implications for Apatite Volatile Records in Oxidized and Thermally Altered Chondrite Parent Bodies
The mineral apatite [Ca5(PO4)3(F,Cl,OH)] is one of the primary mineralogical reservoirs for phosphorus on Earth, and it is a common phosphate mineral within a broad range of extraterrestrial samples. Naturally occurring apatite hosts F, Cl, and OH as essential structural constituents, and all three make up the apatite endmembers fluorapatite, chlorapatite, and hydroxylapatite, respectively. The presence of apatite in chondrite parent bodies indicates that apatite may hold a record of volatiles and their associated processes during the nascent stages of planetesimal formation and evolution.
F. M. McCubbin↗
The Cranfield Meteorite: an H3-5 (Regolith?) Breccia
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
L. C. Welzenbach↗
Simulating Micrometeoroid Bombardment on Mercury: Identifying New Space Weathering Features in the Laboratory
Airless bodies are continually exposed to the harsh interplanetary space environment, causing the alteration of their surfaces through a process known as space weathering (SW). SW is dominated by solar wind irradiation and micrometeoroid bombardment, which together alter the spectral, microstructural, and chemical characteristics of grains on the surface of airless bodies. The effects of SW are variable and depend on the heliocentric distance and the initial composition of the planetary surface, among other factors. On the Moon and S- type asteroids, it is well established that SW darkens and reddens the surface of these bodies and attenuates absorption bands across the Vis-NIR wavelengths. These spectral effects are largely the result of the production of metallic Fe nanoparticles (npFe). However, Mercury’s SW environment is unique compared to the Moon and S-type asteroids. Mercury is a geochemical endmember, with a surface composition low in Fe (<2 wt.%) and enriched in volatile components, including regions of the surface hypothesized to contain up to 4 wt.% graphite in the low reflectance material (LRM). In fact, the presence of graphite on Mercury has been hypothesized to act as a reducing agent for silicates during SW to produce Si-bearing Fe-rich metal. In addition, its location in the solar system exposes Mercury to an extreme SW environment, with the surface of the planet experiencing an intense solar wind flux and higher flux and velocity of micrometeoroid impactors compared to the Moon and S-type asteroids. The effects that such harsh SW has on materials with the unique compositional characteristics of Mercury are not well constrained. To better understand SW at Mercury, we must investigate these processes in the laboratory. Here, we present the results of our analyses of the spectral, microstructural and chemical characteristics of Mercury analog samples irradiated by pulsed laser to simulate the short duration, high temperature events associated with micrometeoroid impacts.
Nick Bott↗
Preliminary Characterization of Spinel Troctolite Clast Identified in Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA) Core 73002
The lunar magnesian (Mg-) suite is a diverse lithological group composed of Mg-rich mafic minerals. The Mg-suite consists primarily of troctolites, norites, gabbronorites, and spinel troctolites. These rocks exhibit contradictory geochemical traits, with mafic minerals bearing high Mg# (molar 100×Mg/[Mg+Fe]) indicating primitive parental magmas, but also plagioclase saturation and enrichments in incompatible trace elements (i.e., KREEP) indicate more evolved parental magmas. A variety of models have been invoked to explain the occurrence and petrogenesis of the Mg-suite. Here, we report on a new spinel troctolite clast found in Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA) program core 73002. Sample 73002 was acquired at Station 3 during Apollo 17 as the upper part of a double-drive tube with sample 73001. During processing, the spinel troctolite clast (0.066 g) was found at the 4.0–4.5 cm depth interval.
A. C. Stadermann↗
Crystal chemistry of merrillite from Martian meteorites: Mineralogical recorders of magmatic processes and planetary differentiation
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
C. K. Shearer↗