Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

F.M. McCubbin

Publications and source records attributed to F.M. McCubbin.

The oxidation state of sulfur in lunar apatites in meteorites versus Apollo rocks

Sulfur can be present in apatite mineral grains as S6+ [1], S2- [2], or a mixture of the two [3, 4]. The proportion of S6+ to S2- present in the apatite is thought to be predominantly controlled by the prevailing oxygen fugacity (fO2) conditions during crystallization (along with temperature, pressure, and major element composition; [2-4]). Measurements of apatites and proximal residual glass in the lunar basalts 12039 and 10044 by X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy show that sulfur occurs as S2- in both the mesostasis glass and apatite when measurements are performed far from cracks or pits in the thin section [2], consistent with other mineralogical indications of low fO2 (∆IW-1) during petrogenesis. However, analyses of apatite grains in both samples that were acquired near cracks or pits in the thin section sometimes revealed minor but nonnegligible spectral evidence for the presence of S6+ (e.g., S6+/ΣS > 0.03; [2]). This evidence was interpreted as either primary S2- altered to S6+ in the thin section, or S6+ of secondary origin, deposited in the fractures of the samples [2, 5]. It is unknown whether this alteration is lunar or terrestrial in origin, with implications for lunar petrogenesis if lunar [e.g., 5], or sample handling and curation if terrestrial [e.g., 6]. Note: Extended abstract on document.

M. Brounce

Mars Sample Return (MSR) Sample Receiving Facility (SRF) Assessment Study (MSAS)

NASA, in partnership with the European Space Agency (ESA), is seeking to return Martian geological and atmospheric samples to Earth for scientific study in the early 2030s. Due to the possibility that the samples could contain extraterrestrial life, Mars Sample Return (MSR) is classified as a Category V: Restricted Earth Return mission by the NASA Planetary Protection Office. As a result of this classification, a MSR Sample Receiving Facility (SRF) must not only provide a pristine environment to ensure samples are protected from terrestrial contamination for scientific investigations, it must also provide high-containment (biosafety level 4 [BSL-4]-equivalence) to isolate the samples from Earth’s biosphere until the samples are deemed safe for release and/or sterilized. The nominal utilization period for a SRF is anticipated to be 2-5 years and is intended to enable curation activities, biohazard assessment, select early science activities, and the rapid release of samples to the scientific community. However, to account for possible delays in schedule or the identification of extant life, this anticipated period of time must be flexible to accommodate schedule extensions and contingency plans. Due to requirements for high-level biological containment and cleanliness, a traditional receiving/curation facility cannot be utilized for MSR. Therefore, beginning in 2022, NASA Johnson Space Center is performing a MSR SRF Assessment Study (MSAS) to investigate the most optimal facility modality for a MSR SRF, as well as start to define programmatic early estimate of costs and schedules before the initial design phase begins. NASA is partnering with industry contractors (architectural and engineering firms with BSL-4 and cleanroom technology experience, as well as other contracted infrastructure and construction specialists) along with selected experts from NASA, ESA, existing U.S. BSL-4 facilities, and other U.S. government agencies, to carry out the assessment study. The MSAS should also aid in the future refinement of the science requirements (e.g., contamination control, equipment accommodations) before site-specific design would commence. As part of the MSAS, NASA is planning to assess an array of possibilities for a MSR SRF. One of the main considerations is the facility modality and whether an existing BSL-4 facility can be utilized (for some or all functions); or, if new constructure would be required, would a traditional fixed facility or a modular facility the best choice. MSAS will also investigate the ability of the modalities to accommodate two different facility capability endmembers: 1) a minimal facility focusing on biohazard assessment and curation tasks with a small footprint, and 2) an enhanced facility with additional capabilities to enable expedited processing and the completion of time-sensitive and (some) sterilization-sensitive science. The assessment is intended to generate information that will inform the selection of facility modalities for high-level conceptual design development. While the assessment study will focus on SRF requirements for accommodating curation, science, and sample safety assessment infrastructure, it will also consider an array of other factors, such as ease of access for international users, decommissioning, repurposing, future sale or lease following MSR’s use of the facility, and uncontained preparatory laboratory spaces. Upon completion of the study, the preferred modality and refined requirements would be utilized for site-specific design but will not be finalized until NASA’s completion of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process.

A.D. Harrington

Extraction Efficiency of Organics From Mars Regolith Analogue Samples

The Mars 2020 rover mission has collected and cached samples from the martian surface for possible retrieval and subsequent return to Earth. Mars Sample Return (MSR) materials are believed to contain organic compounds that will be thoroughly examined to test the hypothesis of the existence of past or present life on Mars. Post-mission analyses will depend on the development of a set of reliable sample handling and analysis procedures that cover the full range of materials, which may or may not contain evidence of past or present martian life.

L.C.Welzenbach

Mars Sample Return: Considerations for the Curation of Astromaterials from a Restricted Planet

The joint NASA/ESA Mars Sample Return (MSR) campaign is underway. The Perseverance Rover has already collected a returnable sample suite currently cached at Three Forks and the pairs to these samples are stored on the Rover with more compelling samples planned to be collected. The MSR collection would represent the most geologically diverse astromaterial collection ever returned and should provide information on topics ranging from Martian geological and biological history to Martian environmental hazards and in situ resource utilization to support potential human exploration. Although Jezero Crater and the surrounding area are not Mars special regions, the scientific opinion is that Mars as a whole is of significant interest to the process of chemical evolution and/or the origin of life. Therefore, due to possibility, however remote, that the samples could contain extraterrestrial life, MSR is classified as a Category V: Restricted Earth Return mission by the NASA Planetary Protection Office. As a result of this classification, a MSR Sample Receiving Facility (SRF) must not only provide a pristine environment to ensure samples are protected from terrestrial contamination for scientific investigations, but it must also provide high-containment to isolate the samples from Earth’s biosphere until the samples are deemed safe for release and/or sterilized.

Mars Sample Return