Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Fabricatore, Emily D..
ackground/Objectives. As part of its Vulnerability Assessment and Resilience Plan (VARP), the Dept. of Energy’s Savannah River Site (SRS) was required to first perform an analysis of the site’s climate vulnerability by quantifying the current and future risks.
Most remaining Department of Energy (DOE) sites will require extended periods of institutional control, especially at complex groundwater sites where attenuation-based strategies have been implemented to facilitate closure. The current practice of monitoring—obtaining and analyzing contaminant concentration in groundwater samples at numerous wells—will account for a large portion of the projected life-cycle at these DOE sites unless a new approach is adopted. State-of-the-art technologies are being developed, including in situ sensors, geophysics, radiation mapping, numerical modeling and AI/ML. These technologies can optimize monitoring strategies in space and time, provide spatially extensive information at vulnerable regions and/or provide more continuous monitoring at lower cost. As part of DOE’s Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM’s) efforts to advance long-term monitoring systems, an in-person/virtual hybrid workshop was hosted by Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) on January 24 and 25, 2023, in Augusta, Georgia. Because DOE-EM’s complex sites will eventually be transferred to DOE’s Office of Legacy Management (DOE-LM), representatives of DOE-LM were important participants in the workshop. The purpose of the workshop was to identify challenges and opportunities for deploying advanced technologies for long-term monitoring at DOE sites. The key questions during the workshop were: 1) the regulatory acceptance of replacing a process that traditionally has used laboratory sampling and analysis of groundwater samples, and 2) the application of this strategy to the southwestern arid sites that include many of the remaining DOE-EM and DOE-LM complex groundwater plumes. Characteristics common to most arid sites present both limitations and opportunities for advanced technologies. DOE-EM has funded a National Laboratory team from SRNL, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to establish the overarching framework of long-term monitoring by systematically combining advanced hardware and software technologies. This project is titled “Advanced Long-Term Environmental Monitoring Systems (ALTEMIS)” and is sponsored by the DOE-EM Technology Development Program. The multi-laboratory team is currently developing and testing innovative monitoring strategies, including the use of in situ groundwater sensors, geophysics, drone/satellite-based remote sensing, reactive transport modeling, and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML). The project’s demonstration testbed is at the Savannah River Site (SRS) F-Area Seepage Basins, where a well-characterized complex groundwater plume composed of uranium and other radionuclides is in the latter stages of remediation. The workshop included more than 70 participants, presentations, a field visit to F-Area, breakout working groups, and large group discussion. Participants developed recommendations on five topics: in situ sensors, spatially integrative tools, challenges to regulatory acceptance, AI/ML strategies, and transitioning sites to DOE-LM.
The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) is tasked with closing cleanup sites throughout the DOE-EM complex. A major component of successfully closing the sites is the deactivation and decommissioning (D&D) of radioactively contaminated buildings in nuclear facilities. Deactivation consists of the process of placing a contaminated facility in stable condition in order to minimize any risks that could affect workers, the public, and the environment. Successful deactivation and decommissioning consists of leaving the buildings in an agreed upon end state to provide future protection against hazards. Hazards include radiation but can also include asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, and other environmental and physical hazards.
The Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste System (LWS) contains approximately 66 tons of mercury within the liquids, salts, and sludges that are currently being processed into final wasteforms for disposal. Mercury concentrations within the system exceed those typically experienced in environmental or industrial systems; thus, management of mercury compounds continues to be a priority for SRS. In the LWS, waste is vitrified into a borosilicate glass wasteform that contains most of the radioactivity, while the lower activity solutions are dispositioned in a low-level grout wasteform, or “saltstone”. The alkaline, high ionic strength caustic wastes are pumped, evaporated, and otherwise managed throughout the LWS and Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) as they are stored and prepared for conversion to the final wasteforms. Because of the complexity of this system, a key component of effective mercury management in the LWS requires analysis of mercury in various physical phases. The high concentration of mercury within the SRS LWS has the potential to generate vapor-phase contamination. Elemental mercury (Hg 0 ), dimethylmercury ((CH 3 ) 2 Hg), and methylmercury (CH 3 Hg + ) are among species known or suspected to contribute to the flux of mercury from liquid to vapor phase (Iverfeldt and Lindquist, 1982). Chemical speciation affects not only mercury behavior in LWS operations but may also affect the performance of mercury treatment and removal technologies in the LWS.
Mercury in the Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste System (LWS) exists in various forms, including: a) ionic inorganic mercury, organomercury (e.g., methyl Hg), and other less abundant species dissolved in LWS fluids, b) mercury solids such as oxides, hydroxides, amalgams, sulfides, and sorbed mercury, c) accumulations of dense liquid elemental mercury, and d) vapor phase elemental and organomercury mercury in tank headspace gas and in evaporators. Strategic and proactive management of the estimated 60,000 Kg mercury in the LWS requires deployment of efficient and effective paradigms for sampling and analysis of the total quantity of mercury in the various physical-chemical forms. Scoping tests of selective gas-phase sorbents for mercury speciation were performed to support LWS objectives. This research specifically focused on developing and testing streamlined methods to obtain high-quality analytical results for gaseous mercury species. The proposed methods are straightforward, using small columns (microcolumns) filled with materials that selectively sorb one or more target forms of mercury. Simple differentiation of mercury species and quantification is then achieved using an efficient thermal-desorption-based total mercury analyzer as the final step. Benefits associated with transitioning from multistep procedures such as EPA Methods 245.1, 1630 and 1631to streamlined microcolumn approaches include reduced analysis time, labor, and waste generation. Such transitioning would maximize the value of the current deployment of direct mercury analysis (EPA Method 7473) at SRS. This work has two target end uses: 1) simplifying the analysis steps and reducing costs for liquid samples (e.g., developing a total organic mercury (TOM) method), and 2) providing options for high-quality onsite analysis and rapid turnaround for gas samples in support of SRS LWS industrial hygiene (IH) objectives.
The Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste System (LWS) contains liquids, salts and sludges that are currently being processed into final wasteforms for disposition, specifically, waste glass for sludges, solids and liquids containing high levels of radioactivity, and saltstone grout for low activity decontaminated liquid solutions. The LWS also contains approximately 60,000 kg of mercury present in the following physical and chemical forms, specifically: a) ionic inorganic mercury, organomercury (e.g., methylmercury), and other minor components found in LWS fluids b) mercury solids such as oxides, hydroxides, amalgams sulfides and sorbed mercury, c) accumulations of dense liquid elemental mercury, and d) vapor phase elemental and organomercury mercury found in tank headspace gas and in evaporators. An effective and proactive management strategy of the mercury present in the LWS is needed to support processing of LWS wastes into glass and saltstone. Sustainable processing of the LAWS to completion requires mercury removal from the LWS at a rate of approximately 2,900 kg/yr. This removal can be accomplished through existing mercury treatment systems or newly implemented LWS “purge points”. The chemical speciation of mercury has emerged as the key factor that controls mercury behavior in the LWS. For example, past studies demonstrated that mercury speciation is adversely impacting the performance of existing removal systems so that significant levels of mercury are recycled from the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) back to the tank farm. Consequently, mercury concentrations have slowly increased in the LWS tank fluids over time. The presence of organo-mercury has also been identified as the cause of increased mercury leaching from saltstone. In response to these challenges, the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM-TD) Technology Development Program has supported a series of scoping studies predicated on manipulating or controlling mercury speciation and mercury behaviors within the constraints of LWS waste chemistry and safety conditions. The intent of these studies was to rapidly triage potential technology options and develop a technically based go / no go recommendation for further work. This composite report presents the results of three scoping studies: 1) advanced photooxidation processes, 2) chemical reduction, and 3) mercury getters.