Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Franciscus, Leo C..
A multi-heat addition turbine engine (MHATE) incorporates a plurality of heat addition devices to transfer energy to air and a plurality of turbines to extract energy from the air while converting it to work. The MHATE provides dry power and lower fuel consumption or lower combustor exit temperatures.
A study was made of multiheat addition turbine engines (MHATE) which incorporate multiple burners and turbines. The types of engines studied were a MHATE two-spool duct burning turbo fan and a single-spool turbojet. A conventional duct burning turbofan and a TBE turbojet were studied for comparison. Comparisons of the thrust and specific fuel consumption of the engines were made for maximum burner temperatures of 2400 F and 2900 F. The results of the study show that the MHATE engines with maximum burner temperatures of 2400 F obtain the same thrust and specific fuel consumption as the conventional engines having maximum burner temperatures of 2900 F. This would have the potential for significant reductions in harmful emissions of NO(x). When the MHATE and conventional engines have the same maximum burner temperatures, the MHATE engines achieve 15 to 50 percent more thrust.
With the resurgence of interest in high supersonic and hypersonic flight there is a need to simulate airbreathing engines which may be used in this flight regime. To meet this requirement the RAMSCRAM code was developed. The code calculates 1-D flow properties at each component interface and the overall performance of the engine. It uses equilibrium thermodynamics which accounts for dissociation and allows for any fuel or combination of fuels. The program can simulate ramjet, scramjet, rocket, and ducted rocket engines.
A study was made to evaluate potential improvement to a commercial supersonic transport by powering it with supersonic through-flow fan turbofan engines. A Mach 3.2 mission was considered. The three supersonic fan engines considered were designed to operate at bypass ratios of 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 at supersonic cruise. For comparison a turbine bypass turbojet was included in the study. The engines were evaluated on the basis of aircraft takeoff gross weight with a payload of 250 passengers for a fixed range of 5000 N.MI. The installed specific fuel consumption of the supersonic fan engines was 7 to 8 percent lower than that of the turbine bypass engine. The aircraft powered by the supersonic fan engines had takeoff gross weights 9 to 13 percent lower than aircraft powered by turbine bypass engines.
A study was done to evaluate the potential improvements in aircraft turbine engine performance by incorporating unique supersonic through-flow fans. Engine performance, weight, and mission studies were carried out for conventional turbofan engines using supersonic through-flow fans. A Mach 3 commercial transport mission was considered. The advantages of the supersonic fan engines were evaluated in terms of mission range comparisons between the supersonic fan engines and conventional engines. The installed specific fuel consumption of the supersonic fan engines was 12 percent better than the conventional engines and the installed weight was projected to be 25 percent lighter. For a takeoff gross weight of 550,000 lbs, the aircraft powered by supersonic fan engines had a range capability of 6600 nm compared to 5300 nm (a 25% improvement) for conventional engines.
A study was done to evaluate the potential improvements in aircraft turbine engine performance by incorporating unique supersonic through-flow fans. Engine performance, weight, and mission studies were carried out for conventional turbofan engines using supersonic through-flow fans. A Mach 3 commercial transport mission was considered. The advantages of the supersonic fan engines were evaluated in terms of mission range comparisons between the supersonic fan engines and conventional engines. The installed specific fuel consumption of the supersonic fan engines was 12 percent better than the conventional engines and the installed weight was projected to be 25 percent lighter. For a takeoff gross weight of 550,000 lbs, the aircraft powered by supersonic fan engines had a range capability of 6600 nm compared to 5300 nm (a 25 percent improvement) for conventional engines.