Franklin D. Harris | Search NASA

NASA NTRS2022

Henrich Focke —Inventor of the First Successful Helicopter

In 1924, Henrich Focke, Georg Wulf and Dr. Werner Naumann started Focke-Wulf Flugzeugbau GmbH (Focke-Wulf Aircraft Manufacturing Ltd.). Focke-Wulf constructed Juan de la Cierva’s C.19 and C.30 Autogiros under license from 1930 until 1937. This led Focke to design the first successful and fully controllable helicopter, the Fw-61. Model tests in his wind tunnel supported the configuration and in 1932 Focke proposed a helicopter project to the ministry with drawings and calculations, which was granted in that same year. Impressed with the success of the Fw-61, the German Air Ministry suggested that Focke establish a new company dedicated to helicopter development and issued him a requirement for an improved design, capable of carrying a 700 kg (1,500 lbs) payload. Focke and Gerd Achgelis (a test pilot) partnered to establish the Focke–Achgelis company in 1938. The Fw-61 became the Fa-61. Historically, Henrich Focke and his Focke-Achgelis company must surely be considered as the developer of the world’s first successful helicopter. They began development of the Focke Wulf company’s Model Fw-61 helicopter, which had a side-by-side rotor system, in 1932. First flight was achieved on June 26, 1936 with test pilot Ewald Rohlfs at the controls. With the Fw-61’s flight demonstrated success, Professor Focke went on to present three early papers: 1. Das Trag- und Hubschrauberproblem (Autogyro and Helicopter Problems), November 1937 2. Forschung und Entwicklung der Drehflügelflugzeuge (Research and Development of Rotating Wing Aircraft), April 1942 3. Fortschritte des Hubschraubers (Progress of the Helicopter), October 1943 The first paper was also published by the German Museum (Munich) in 1938 and it was translated into English on the order of the Ministry of Aircraft Production by J. Helledoren as R.T.P No. 2128 at the end of 1937. The other two reports, however, appear not to have been translated during or after World War II and thus are made public here – probably for the first time. Translations of the three Focke papers are provided in this report. A careful translation from German to English of the papers has been made. Many of original photos have been recovered from the German Museum (Munich). In several cases, the original graphs have been redrawn to enhance each paper’s technical value. The editors have added footnotes where appropriate. The editors consider Focke’s papers to be of such immense technical and historical value that they deserve wide distribution to the rotorcraft industry. Finally, the editors believe that readers of the many technical points Henrich Focke makes about his development program will see that Focke’s program anticipated even today’s best rotorcraft industry efforts.

Inventor↗

NASA NTRS2020

Model Rotor Hover Performance at Low Reynolds Number

Hover performance data from four key experiments has been analyzed in detail to shed some light on model rotor hover performance at low Reynolds number. Each experiment used the simplest blade geometry. The blades were constant chord and untwisted. Three experiments used blades with the NACA 0012 airfoil from root to tip. The NACA 0015 was used in the earliest test. The four experiments provide data spanning a Reynolds number range of 136,500 to 548,700. The specific objective of this report is to ask and answer two questions: 1. Does blade aspect ratio influence hover performance or is rotor solidity the fundamental rotor geometry parameter for practical engineering purposes? ANSWER: Rotor solidity is the fundamental rotor geometry parameter for practical engineering purposes. Any effect of blade aspect ratio appears to be such a secondary variable that its effect lies within the range of experimental error. 2. Is Reynolds number a significant factor in scaling up hover performance to full-scale rotor performance? The answer is twofold. ANSWER: (a) Reynolds number effects on the increase of power with thrust do not appear to be a significant factor for practical engineering purposes, and (b) Reynolds number effects on minimum profile power at or very near zero rotor thrust could not be clearly established primarily because the low torque levels could not be accurately measured with the test equipment used. This has led to significant data scatter. A number of other observations can be made based on the analysis provided herein. For instance: 1. The test matrices used in the four key references contained far too few data points. A collective pitch variation of four or five data points is insufficient to establish experimental accuracy and data repeatability. 2. A common property of the power-versus-thrust (raised to the 3/2 exponent) graphs was that this curve was linear below the onset of blade stall. 3. The blade-to-blade interference at or near zero thrust may, in fact, be creating a turbulent flow field such that the effective Reynolds number at a blade element is considerably greater than what theories using two-dimensional (2D) airfoil properties at a blade element would calculate. 4. Definitive experiments answering the two key questions have yet to be made.

Model Rotor Hover Performance↗