Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Freeman, Gerad M.

Publications and source records attributed to Freeman, Gerad M..

Emerging Technologies Review: Hydrogen Production and Storage

The Air Force Civil Engineer Center has tasked Pacific Northwest National Laboratory with investigating emerging technologies to inform the Air Force’s understanding of the technology and to guide key considerations for implementing technologies that are resilient and alternative sources to the traditional methods used in the Air Force today. This report explores the concept of hydrogen production and storage at Air Force installations.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Subsurface Hydrogen Assessment, Storage, and Technology Acceleration (SHASTA) - Hydrogen Estimator for Logistical Planning (HELP) User’s Manual

This user’s manual describes version 1.0 of the SHASTA-HELP (Subsurface Hydrogen Assessment, Storage, and Technology Acceleration (SHASTA) - Hydrogen Estimator for Logistical Planning (HELP)) tool and provides instructions for use. The purpose of the SHASTA-HELP tool is to integrate the suite of tools developed by the SHASTA research team in a web-based framework for ease of access and more advanced, integrated analysis. This tool contains functionality for estimating the storage potential of pure and blended natural gas-hydrogen mixtures in various subsurface formations and is intended to be used for pre-characterization or site screening purposes. Detailed storage analysis should be conducted by full reservoir simulation models.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Characterizing Hydrogen Storage Potential in U.S. Underground Gas Storage Facilities

Abstract Underground hydrogen storage is a long‐duration energy storage option for a low‐carbon economy. Although research into the technical feasibility of underground hydrogen storage is ongoing, existing underground gas storage (UGS) facilities are appealing candidates for the technology because of their ability to store and deliver natural gas. We estimate that UGS facilities in the United States (U.S.) can store 327 TWh (9.8 MMT) of pure hydrogen. A complete transition to hydrogen storage would reduce the collective working‐gas energy of UGS facilities by ∼75%; however, most (73.2%) UGS facilities could maintain current energy demand using a 20% hydrogen‐natural gas blend. U.S. UGS facilities can buffer 23.9%–44.6% of the high and low hydrogen demand projected for 2050, respectively, which exceeds the current percentage of natural gas demand buffered by storage. Thus, transitioning UGS infrastructure to hydrogen could substantially reduce the number of new hydrogen storage facilities needed to support a hydrogen economy.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Could on-site fuel storage economically reduce power plant-gas grid dependence in pipeline constrained areas like New England?

In the Northeastern United States, natural gas supply constraints have led to periods when gas shortages have caused up to a quarter of all unscheduled power plant outages. Dual fuel oil/gas generators or local gas storage might mitigate gas supply shortages. We use historical power plant operational and availability data to develop a supply curve of the costs required for generators to mitigate fuel shortage failures in New England. Based on 2012–2018 data, we find that the historical fuel shortages at approximately 2 GW worth of gas-fired capacity could be mitigated using on-site fuel storage. For comparison, New England’s average reserve margin was 1.7–2.8 GW over our sample period. Oil dual fuel plants would recoup their investment if compensated with a reliability adder of $\$ 3-7$/MWh during their normal operations, while $\$ 7-16$/MWh would incentivize using onsite, compressed natural gas storage. We estimate that the capital expenses associated with the fuel storage options would be less expensive than installing battery backup for resource adequacy at current battery prices.

03 NATURAL GAS↗