Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Fuchs, Till

Publications and source records attributed to Fuchs, Till.

Evaluating Pressure‐dependent Discharge Behavior of Foil Versus In situ Plated Lithium Metal Anodes in Solid‐State Batteries

Abstract Anode‐free manufacturing of solid‐state batteries (SSBs) shows promise to maximize energy density by eliminating excess lithium (Li) and simplifying battery production. However, high reversibility during discharge (stripping of Li) is necessary for long‐lifetime SSBs with a limited Li reservoir. Further, the plastic flow of Li changes depending on the Li thickness, leading to possible differences in discharge performance under stack pressure. This work investigates the pressure‐dependent discharge performance of anode‐free manufactured SSBs with in situ plated Li and compares the performance to that of conventional thick Li foil cells. Distinct stripping behavior is observed at low pressures (0–1 MPa), where Li diffusivity and initial interfacial contact may control accessible capacity, compared to high pressures (3–10 MPa) where mechanical deformation of Li likely governs stripping behavior. Analysis of impedance spectra collected during stripping shows that additional stack pressure delays the formation of deep, as opposed to lateral, voids in the Li anode. These results provide insights to guide the transition from thick Li foil anodes to anode‐free manufactured SSBs.

Haslam, Catherine G.↗

Study of Void Formation at the Lithium|Solid Electrolyte Interface

There is growing recognition of the critical role of void formation in lithium metal anodes in solid-state batteries and its impact on electrochemical performance. While experimental studies have demonstrated the challenges ensuing from void formation at the lithium metal interface with the solid electrolyte, there is a need to understand and quantify the role of intrinsic transport properties in lithium metal and the impact of external stimuli, such as temperature, pressure, and current density. Here, we develop this understanding by constructing a phase field-based model that captures the evolution of void domains at the lithium-solid electrolyte interface. Growth of the pores is driven by the fast removal of lithium from the interface during stripping at high current densities. Relative magnitudes of the bulk and surface lithium diffusivities, along with the applied current density, dictate the final pore morphology. Increasing the temperature results in faster diffusion, while external applied pressure causes creep flow of lithium, both of which help to mitigate the evolution of voids by quickly transporting metal from the bulk to the interface. Finally, a phase map as a function of temperature and pressure is developed as a guide to determine the regions that can lead to the stable cycling of lithium metal.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Non‐Linear Kinetics of The Lithium Metal Anode on Li 6 PS 5 Cl at High Current Density: Dendrite Growth and the Role of Lithium Microstructure on Creep

Abstract Interfacial instability, viz., pore formation in the lithium metal anode (LMA) during discharge leading to high impedance, current focusing induced solid–electrolyte (SE) fracture during charging, and formation/behaviour of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI), at the anode, is one of the major hurdles in the development of solid‐state batteries (SSBs). Also, understanding cell polarization behaviour at high current density is critical to achieving the goal of fast‐charging battery and electric vehicle. Herein, via in situ electrochemical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements, performed with freshly deposited lithium microelectrodes on transgranularly fractured fresh Li6PS5Cl (LPSCl), the LiǀLPSCl interface kinetics are investigated beyond the linear regime. Even at relatively small overvoltages of a few mV, the LiǀLPSCl interface shows non‐linear kinetics. The interface kinetics possibly involve multiple rate‐limiting processes, i.e., ion transport across the SEI and SE|SEI interfaces, as well as charge transfer across the LiǀSEI interface. The total polarization resistance R P of the microelectrode interface is determined to be ≈ 0.8 Ω cm 2 . It is further shown that the nanocrystalline lithium microstructure can lead to a stable LiǀSE interface via Coble creep along with uniform stripping. Also, spatially resolved lithium deposition, i.e., at grain surface flaws, grain boundaries, and flaw‐free surfaces, indicates exceptionally high mechanical endurance of flaw‐free surfaces toward cathodic load (>150 mA cm −2 ). This highlights the prominent role of surface defects in dendrite growth.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Origin of the lithium metal anode instability in solid-state batteries during discharge

Enabling the lithium metal anode (LMA) in solid-state batteries (SSBs) would increase energy density and specific energy compared with lithium-ion batteries. However, pore formation in LMAs with irregular morphology, even at low current density, during discharge results in an unstable, high-impedance interface. Understanding and addressing this inherent anode instability is essential for increasing the power densities in SSBs. Herein, we suggest that the morphology of the stripped electrode is related to dislocations in the LMA. To investigate the influence of dislocations, symmetric cells, Li|Li 6.25 Al 0.25 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO)|X-Li, are studied, where X-Li represents the microstructurally controlled LMA obtained via suitable thermomechanical processing. Operando impedance measurements are corroborated with SEM, confocal microscopy, and AFM data. Based on the experimental observations, a mechanism for pore formation is proposed. Here we show that the stack pressure required to maintain a stable interface is governed by the lithium microstructure and its thermomechanical processing history.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Reaction Current Heterogeneity at the Interface between a Lithium Electrode and Polymer/Ceramic Composite Electrolytes

Although lithium metal anodes are expected to increase the energy density of next-generation batteries, dendrite growth during charge remains a major bottleneck preventing widespread implementation. Composite solid electrolytes with ceramic particles embedded in a polymer matrix have the potential to prevent dendrites owing to the higher mechanical stiffness while also possessing the flexibility to maintain contact with the electrode. However, microscopically, the different mechanical and electrochemical properties of the polymer and ceramic domains can cause inhomogeneous charge transfer at the Li/electrolyte interface, which can lead to nonuniform Li deposition and propagation of dendrites. Here, we computationally examine the coupled electrochemical, transport, and mechanical processes at the interface to determine the propensity for dendrite formation and possible approaches to mitigate this issue. Predictions of two possible microstructures at the interface, namely, (i) where both the polymer and ceramic come in contact with Li metal and (ii) when only the polymer comes in contact with Li metal, suggest that the former has a greater tendency for nonuniform plating. In addition, predictions suggest that minimizing the interfacial resistance between polymers and ceramics and incorporating interlayers between the electrode and electrolyte help mitigate current heterogeneity. In conclusion, these predictions provide guidance for experimental approaches to prevent dendrites in composite electrolytes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Oxide‐Based Solid‐State Batteries: A Perspective on Composite Cathode Architecture

Abstract The garnet‐type phase Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) attracts significant attention as an oxide solid electrolyte to enable safe and robust solid‐state batteries (SSBs) with potentially high energy density. However, while significant progress has been made in demonstrating compatibility with Li metal, integrating LLZO into composite cathodes remains a challenge. The current perspective focuses on the critical issues that need to be addressed to achieve the ultimate goal of an all‐solid‐state LLZO‐based battery that delivers safety, durability, and pack‐level performance characteristics that are unobtainable with state‐of‐the‐art Li‐ion batteries. This perspective complements existing reviews of solid/solid interfaces with more emphasis on understanding numerous homo‐ and heteroionic interfaces in a pure oxide‐based SSB and the various phenomena that accompany the evolution of the chemical, electrochemical, structural, morphological, and mechanical properties of those interfaces during processing and operation. Finally, the insights gained from a comprehensive literature survey of LLZO–cathode interfaces are used to guide efforts for the development of LLZO‐based SSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Overcoming Anode Instability in Solid‐State Batteries through Control of the Lithium Metal Microstructure

Abstract Enabling the lithium metal anode (LMA) in solid‐state batteries (SSBs) is the key to developing high energy density battery technologies. However, maintaining a stable electrode–electrolyte interface presents a critical challenge to high cycling rate and prolonged cycle life. One such issue is the interfacial pore formation in LMA during stripping. To overcome this, either higher stack pressure or binary lithium alloy anodes are used. Herein, it is shown that fine‐grained ( d = 20 µm) polycrystalline LMA can avoid pore formation by exploiting the microstructural dependence of the creep rates. In a symmetric cell set‐up, i.e., LiǀLi 6.25 Al 0.25 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO)ǀLi, fine‐grained LMA achieves > 11.0 mAh cm −2 compared to ≈ 3.6 mAh cm −2 for coarse‐grained LMA ( d = 295 µm) at 0.1 mA cm −2 and at moderate stress of 2.0 MPa. Smaller diffusion lengths (≈ 20 µm) and higher diffusivity pathway along dislocations ( D d ≈ 10 −7 cm 2 s −1 ), generated during cell fabrication, result in enhanced viscoplastic deformation in fine‐grained polycrystalline LMA. The electrochemical performances corroborate well with estimated creep rates. Thus, microstructural control of LMA can significantly reduce the required stack pressure during stripping. These results are particularly relevant for “anode‐free” SSBs wherein both the microstructure and the mechanical state of the lithium are critical parameters.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Current‐Dependent Lithium Metal Growth Modes in “Anode‐Free” Solid‐State Batteries at the Cu|LLZO Interface

Abstract Controlling the lithium growth morphology in lithium reservoir‐free cells (RFCs), so‐called “anode‐free” solid‐state batteries, is of key interest to ensure stable battery operation. Despite several benefits of RFCs like improved energy density and easier fabrication, issues during the charging of the cell hinder the transition from lithium metal batteries with a lithium reservoir layer to RFCs. In RFCs, the lithium metal anode is plated during the first charging step at the interface between a metal current collector and the solid electrolyte, which is prone to highly heterogeneous growth instead of the desired homogeneous film‐like growth. Herein, the lithium morphology during the first charging step in RFCs is explored as a function of current density and current collector thickness. Using operando scanning electron microscopy, an increase in the lithium particle density is observed with increasing current density at the Cu|Li 6.25 Al 0.25 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 interface. This observation is then applied to improve the area coverage of lithium by pulsed plating. It is also shown that thin current collectors ( d = 100 nm) are unsuited for RFCs, as lithium whiskers penetrate them, resulting in highly heterogeneous interfaces. This suggests the use of thicker metal layers (several µm) to mitigate whisker penetration and facilitate homogeneous lithium plating.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Increasing the Pressure‐Free Stripping Capacity of the Lithium Metal Anode in Solid‐State‐Batteries by Carbon Nanotubes

Abstract Lithium metal is the key anode material for solid‐state‐batteries as its successful implementation will drastically increase their energy and power densities. However, anode contact loss during stripping leads to dendrites upon plating and subsequent cell failure. Design strategies to mitigate these issues are crucial to enable the use of lithium metal anodes. This paper reports the dissolution kinetics of composite anodes made of lithium metal and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with a garnet‐type solid electrolyte (SE). In addition to an enhancement of the effective diffusion within the anode, its dissolution is fundamentally changed from being 2D to 3D. By maintaining contact with the SE, the CNTs facilitate lithium transport to the interface, which yields more than 20 mAh cm −2 discharge capacity at 100 µ A cm −2 without the application of external stack pressure ( > 1 MPa). Conclusions drawn from electrochemical data on the anode microstructure are validated using cryo‐focused‐ion‐beam scanning electron microscopy and correlated with the mechanical properties. Micro‐indentation, acoustic analysis, and stress–strain testing show that mechanical properties of the anode, like yield strength and hardness, are adjustable. Overall, it is shown that the mechanical and electrochemical properties of Li–CNT composite electrodes can be tailored to suit the requirements of a practical cell.

Fuchs, Till↗

Working Principle of an Ionic Liquid Interlayer During Pressureless Lithium Stripping on Li 6.25 Al 0.25 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) Garnet‐Type Solid Electrolyte

Abstract Solid‐state‐batteries employing lithium metal anodes promise high theoretical energy and power densities. However, morphological instability occurring at the lithium/solid–electrolyte interface when stripping and plating lithium during cell cycling needs to be mitigated. Vacancy diffusion in lithium metal is not sufficiently fast to prevent pore formation at the interface above a certain current density during stripping. Applied pressure of several MPa can prevent pore formation, but this is not conducive to practical application. This work investigates the concept of ionic liquids as “self‐adjusting” interlayers to compensate morphological changes of the lithium anode while avoiding the use of external pressure. A clear improvement of the lithium dissolution process is observed as it is possible to continuously strip more than 70 μm lithium (i. e., 15 mAh cm −2 charge) without the need for external pressure during assembly and electrochemical testing of the system. The impedance of the investigated electrodes is analyzed in detail, and contributions of the different interfaces are evaluated. The conclusions are corroborated with morphology studies using cryo‐FIB‐SEM and chemical analysis using XPS. This improves the understanding of the impedance response and lithium stripping in electrodes employing liquid interlayers, acting as a stepping‐stone for future optimization.

Fuchs, Till↗

Kinetic versus Thermodynamic Stability of LLZO in Contact with Lithium Metal

Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) garnet-based oxides are a promising class of solid electrolytes used as the separator in all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). While LLZO is considered to have a wide electrochemical stability window, its intrinsic stability in contact with lithium metal is not sufficiently well understood, and there is still a debate on the key question of whether LLZO does or does not form passivation layers before and during cycling. Utilizing both in situ and operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy techniques, in this work we reveal the presence of a kinetic barrier to the reduction of LLZO by Li metal, with the extent of oxygen-deficient interphase (ODI) formation depending sensitively on the energetics of Li metal arriving at the Li vertical bar LLZO interface. Despite the clear presence of a kinetic barrier to reduction, the electrochemical response of the Li vertical bar LLZO interface is unchanged by the presence of the ODI, indicating that ODI formation during electrochemical cycling does not hinder charge transfer across the Li vertical bar LLZO interface. Overall, these results reveal that the reactivity of LLZO with Li metal depends not only on the material properties of the adjoining phases (i.e., surface purity and active contact) and their resulting thermodynamic stability but also on the energy input at the interface and the resulting reaction kinetics. Furthermore, the presence of a kinetic barrier to reduction highlights the additional complexities governing the reactivity of solid-state interfaces in ASSBs and underscores the importance of operando characterization of interfacial stability to design more robust, high-performance protection strategies for solid electrolytes in contact with reactive electrodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗