Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Gardner, R. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Gardner, R. J..

Development of a LOCA Experimental Benchmark for BISON - Milestone L2:FMC.P15.08

Since 2013 CASL has been planning and working towards a PWR LOCA Challenge Problem. Since BISON is the CASL fuel rod simulation platform, it plays a central role in that activity. The goal of the FY-17 CASL milestone reported here was to develop an Experimental Benchmark for LOCA analysis using BISON. Activities encompassed both code development and validation. This report provides a current snapshot of BISON’s capability for LOCA behavior including: 1) a summary of code extensions to facilitate accident analysis, 2) a series of separate effects tests, and 3) initial code validation to complex integral rod LOCA behavior. Conclusions from each of these main activities are summarized below. The key material and behavior models required to address transient high-temperature phenomena occurring during LOCAs in a standard PWR have now been implemented in BISON. These apply specifically to UO2 fuel, Zircaloy cladding and water coolant. During FY-17 important new capability to address axial UO2 fuel relocation (for 1.5D geometry) and account for oxidation energy deposition in cladding, were included. Planned future development efforts include extending the axial fuel relocation model from 1.5D to 2D/3D and improving BISON’s fission gas release model to include transient gas release associated with the high burnup structure (HBS) in high burnup fuel. Additionally, investigation of potential anisotropic creep behavior in Zircaloy cladding is planned, assuming sufficient experimental data are available to support this effort. A substantial number of separate effects validation cases (42 tests from 3 experimental series) have been completed to compare BISON predictions to measured ballooning and burst behavior for Zircaloy cladding. Such experiments include a wide variety of pressures, temperatures and loading rates. In general, BISON predictions of burst temperature, pressure and burst time are very reasonable. For one experimental series, however, involving both very high temperatures and strain rates, BISON systematically over-predicts the cladding hoop strain. Investigation of this discrepancy is an important and planned activity. With another experiment an effort was made to investigate 3D cladding response due to an azimuthal temperature variation. Results indicated 3D effects are potentially important in fuel rod analysis during LOCAs and will be further investigated in the future. BISON validation to a series of integral fuel rod experiments has also been completed. These experiments involve all fuel and cladding phenomena relevant to LOCA conditions, and can include complexities associated with irradiated fuel relative to fresh fuel. Such experiments also generally include complex thermal-hydraulic boundary conditions. Four experiments (6 rods) have been considered to date including simulated fuel (ZrO2) and both fresh and high-burnup UO2. Test rods ranged from rodlets to full length commercial PWR fuel rods. As with the separate effects experiments, BISON predictions of burst temperature, pressure and burst time are generally very reasonable. Comparisons to cladding peak strain and rod outer diameter axial profiles are less satisfactory, and identify material models and possibly modeling approximations (e.g., 2D-RZ vs 3D geometries) requiring additional investigation. Validation of BISON for integral rod LOCA behavior is by no means complete, with additional cases planned.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

BISON FY17 Accident Capability Development

The CASL-funded development work accomplished for milestone L2:FMC.P15.04 and described herein includes important new capabilities necessary for LOCA analysis, specifically: 1) an empirical model for axial fuel relocation as a consequence of cladding ballooning, and 2) energy deposition in Zircaloy cladding due to the highly exothermic steam oxidation reaction at high cladding temperatures. A separate chapter documents each of these new capabilities, with further documentation included in the BISON user documentation.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Initial 1.5D BISON Simulation Verification and Validation CASL FY17 Letter Report

This milestone report describes the current efforts to improve the usability of the recently developed 1.5 dimensional capability in BISON, the initial verification of this BISON capability, and initial validation of the 1.5 dimensional models against existing 2 dimensional axisymmetric full length light water reactor (LWR) fuel rods. The 1.5 dimensional (1.5D) capability in BISON was developed to enable the simulation of LWR fuel rods in a less computationally demanding simulation formulation while retaining key physics of interest. BISON was originally developed to solve 2D axisymmetric and 3D models, and this original development focus allows BISON to examine a wider range of fuel types and geometrically complexity than can be solved with lower dimensional frameworks. As the set of problems which BISON is used to solve expands, the software design requirements continue to evolve. Coupling physics in a higher dimensional geometry is not always required to resolve the physics of interest, such as the modeling of radial heat transfer and radial displacement. BISON, built on the dimension-agnostic MOOSE framework, is able to solve problems in 3D, 2D, and 1D with only minor modifications to the material definition code so that the appropriate geometrical representation can be applied in different problems of interest. The motivation for the development and validation of the BISON 1.5D capability is the CASL program's need for a simplified and computationally efficient version of BISON for use in the large multi-physics VERA simulations which include hundreds of individual fuel rods. The original development of the BISON 1.5D simulation capability is described in the CASL FY17 Letter Report from January 2017, and this report documents the continuing work identified in the previous report. The improvements to the usability of the 1.5D capability through input file simplifications, the results of the verification simulations, the results of the initial validation against the 2D assessment cases in BISON, and the future development needs are included within this report.

1.5D Capability↗