Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Ghezel-Ayagh, Hossein

Publications and source records attributed to Ghezel-Ayagh, Hossein.

16 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Next Generation Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Module Development

The overall objective of this project was to develop a transformative Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) building block configuration comprised of multi-stack arrays that can be utilized in large-scale power plants. This transformative design signified the benefits of lower performance degradation coupled with improved reliability, low cost, smaller packaging for easier transport and installation, and improved maintenance and field serviceability characteristics. The project goal was to design and fabricate a scalable hot module for housing an array of SOFC stacks and to demonstrate the characteristics of the module gas distribution, insulation and instrumentation, and DC power take-off. The approach was to validate the design of a stack prototype scalable to megawatt (MW) class systems using FuelCell Energy’s Compact SOFC Architecture (CSA) stacks. The scope of work was intended to design, build, and test a compact and low-cost multi-stack sub-module with flexibility to house CSA stacks and scalable to 350 kW which could ultimately be deployed in construction of MW-class systems.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2024

MW-Class SOFC Pilot System Development

The overall objective of this project is to develop a low-cost, efficient, and reliable MWe-class Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) power system towards commercial deployment in natural-gas fueled distributed generation applications. This report details the successful completion of all project objectives. The main goals of the project were to develop the conceptual design of a MWe-class SOFC power system, and to complete a techno-economic analysis (TEA) to determine system costs at low-volume production levels of >100MW per year. The combination of the BoP equipment cost and SOFC stack module factory cost provided the net fabrication cost of the selected 1MW SOFC system configuration. The results of the study showed that the cost target of less than $6000/kW is achievable for a FOAK 1MW SOFC system, exclusive of the first-time engineering cost. Also, the project included an exploratory analysis of the factory cost of next generation stack technology based on the Compact Solid-oxide Architecture (CSA) design at a high annual manufacturing rate of one-GW produced in a giga-factory. The BoP capital cost for one giga-watt power production was estimated using learning-curve analysis based on the historical manufacturing cost data related to similar high temperature Molten Carbonate fuel cell systems built by FuelCell Energy (FCE). The giga-factory manufactured SOFC cost estimate combined with the BoP cost at high production rates led to the estimation of entire system capital cost. Ultimately, a Cost of Electricity (COE) analysis was performed including natural gas fuel prices, installation and O&M costs, and stack replacement cost. The results of the techno-economic analysis were summarized by parametric estimation of COE for 1MW SOFC NOAK (Nth-of-a-Kind) system with natural gas prices as a variable parameter.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2022

Proton-Conducting Ceramic Electrolyzers for High-Temperature Water Splitting

This project is centered on an exciting new class of proton-conducting ceramic materials that are emerging from the laboratory to play important roles in the commercial sector. While proton-conducting ceramics have been studied since the early 1980s, the unique properties of these materials are only now being harnessed to address societal challenges. The objective of this project is to develop advanced high-temperature water splitting (HTWS) systems for production of hydrogen at a cost less than $2 / kg H2. The specific objectives include development of efficient and durable electrolytic cells and stacks using innovative proton-conducting ceramic materials and operating at a temperature ≥ 500°C. The technical performance targets for the electrolysis stack include: specific resistance of ≤ 0.30 Ω cm 2 , stack electrical efficiency > 95% LHV H2 with current density > 1 A / cm 2 , and a projected stack lifetime of ≥ 7 years. In this program, FuelCell Energy (FCE) teamed with Colorado School of Mines (CSM) to deliver a novel protonic-ceramic electrolysis cell (PCEC) stack capable of producing over 1 kg H2 / day. These targets were demonstrated in an HTWS stack with a capacity for producing ≥1 kg H2 / day.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2022

Protonic Ceramics for Energy Storage & Electricity Generation with Ammonia (Final Report)

The commercial product resulting from this R&D project will enable cost-effective synthesis of the Carbon Neutral Liquid Fuel (CNLF) ammonia, a common chemical, at a small scale for energy and industrial applications using only intermittent renewable energy, water, and air as feedstocks. These products are also capable of producing electrical energy from the CNLF in a fuel cell mode of operation. Thus, the eventual commercial product enables both single direction production of either CLNF or electricity, or alternatively functions as a fully reversible, self-contained energy storage device. The renewed interest in developing electrolysis systems is driven, in part, by the burgeoning renewable, solar, and wind industries and the need for an energy conversion and storage technology that can convert intermittent solar and wind energy into the production of hydrogen. Electrolysis systems integrated into both distributed and central renewable power plants would utilize solar and wind energy as their primary power source to produce renewably generated hydrogen for local energy storage or chemical feedstock purposes. Ammonia is an excellent surrogate for hydrogen transportation. NH3 presents an attractive alternative to hydrogen as a working fluid in reversible devices towards a sustainable green energy-oriented future. Ammonia can be easily liquefied at room temperature at about 8 bar or at -33°C at ambient pressure. In contrast, the liquefaction temperature of hydrogen is -253°C at ambient pressure. NH3 has a significantly higher volumetric energy density (12.7 MJ/L) than compressed hydrogen (4.5 MJ/L at ~70 MPa) or liquefied hydrogen (8.5 MJ/L). Additionally, ammonia is a widely used raw material for agriculture fertilizer and thus has well-established storage, transport, and handling processes (about 180 million tons of ammonia are produced annually). Techno-economic analysis suggests ammonia is the least expensive fuel among hydrogen, gasoline, natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, and methanol.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2022

Reversible Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Systems for Energy Storage and Hydrogen Production

FuelCell Energy (FCE) studied the performance, design, and economics of a reversible solid-oxide fuel cell/electrolyzer integrated with a natural gas-based electricity generation plant and used as an energy storage system. Increased market penetration of renewable energy is challenging for operators of fossilbased plants which are not suited for quick turndown and ramp-up. Process simulations studies show that with utilization of waste heat from the power plant, a high roundtrip efficiency (RTE) around 70% is possible, providing excellent market potential for this energy storage technology, potentially providing improved economics and lifetime for such power plant. The market potential and economics as a function of production volume are analyzed in detail. FCE is continuing the development and commercialization of its solid oxide technology.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2022

Transformational Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) Technology

This project was conducted under the Co-operative Agreement No. DE-FE0027584 with the US Department Energy to developed advanced Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) Technologies. The overall objective of this project was to advance SOFC technology at the cell and stack level to enhance cell robustness and durability, increase performance, and reduce balance-of-plant (BOP) requirements. By reducing system complexity combined with the increases in power density and efficiency, the ultimate goal of the project was to increased reliability and to reduce capital and operating costs of installed systems. The project was focused on pathways that will reduce the cost of the SOFC cell and stack, including the following areas: Robust, redox tolerant cell technology Lower cost cell manufacturing through advances in cell design, which will reduce the amount of material, energy and time used in the fabrication of SOFCs High performance, low temperature electrolyte based on improvement of established materials Innovative SOFC stack architecture which truly integrates Balance of Plant functionality into the stack level design Thermal management of the fuel cell stack for increased durability and expanded window of operation Novel stack design amenable for use in sub-MW to multi-MW-scale power plants and having low replacement cost The incorporation of balance-of-plant (BOP) equipment into the stack platform increased the economic viability of smaller scale systems. The project objectives were met by a multi-prong approach, including new cell design complemented with modifications to existing cell technology, as well as a new stack design incorporating components typically included in the BOP, such as heat exchangers, oxidizer, fuel reformers, and recycle systems. The project culminated with demonstration of a stack test validating the viability of the cell and stack improvements. A cost model was also developed to estimate costs for the advanced stack technology at high volume manufacturing levels. The net outcome of the project is SOFC cell and stack technology with costs significantly below current DOE targets without compromising and, in some cases, improving on the performance and degradation rate demonstrated with the current state-of-the-art stack design. The results of this project advanced the reliability, robustness, and endurance of low-cost SOFC technology that ultimately are ready to be deployed in coal power systems with greater than 60 percent efficiency (based on higher heating value of fuel) and the capability for ≥97% CO 2 capture at a cost-of-electricity that is approximately 40 percent below presently available Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle systems.

03 NATURAL GAS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Cost-effective Manufacturing and Morphological Stabilization of Nanostructured Cathodes for Commercial Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs) [Slides]

The overall goals of the program were to develop methods for preparing and stabilizing SOFC electrodes by infiltration that can be manufactured on a practical scale, then transfer those methods to cells in stacks. Cathodes prepared by infiltration of nanoparticles into a porous scaffold of the electrolyte have demonstrated outstanding electrochemical performance and mechanical strength but are difficult to manufacture due to the large number of infiltration steps required to produce a conductive composite and show poor stability due to sintering of the nanoparticles. At Penn, the main goal was to develop a fabrication method that uses only a small number of infiltration steps. Infiltration with molten salts and electrodeposition were pursued but deemed impractical. A method in which an electronically conductive scaffold consisted of a composite of a mixed conductor, LSF (La 0.9 Sr 0.1 FeO 3 ), with yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) was found to be promising. While some cation mixing between LSF and YSZ was observed during calcination, there was no evidence for new phases in XRD and incorporation of Zr into the perovskite could be minimized by reducing the Sr content of the LSF. To stabilize nanoparticles infiltrated into the LSF-YSZ composite scaffold, the USC team examined the effects of Atomic Layer Deposition with ZrO 2 and infiltrated nanoparticles. Significantly enhanced stability was observed with the infiltrated nanoparticles. The FuelCell Energy team prepared 4”x4” cells in which an LSF-YSZ composite scaffold was cofired with the YSZ electrolyte and infiltrated with LSCF nanoparticles. Apparently because the LSF-YSZ scaffold layer was very thin in this case, the cation mixing that occurred during calcination resulted in a poor scaffold-electrolyte interface which caused reduced performance.

30 DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION↗
DOE OSTI2021

System and method for removing water and hydrogen from anode exhaust

A fuel cell system includes an anode configured to output an anode exhaust stream comprising hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and water; and a membrane dryer configured to receive the anode exhaust stream, remove water from the anode exhaust stream, and output a membrane dryer outlet stream. The membrane dryer includes a first chamber configured to receive the anode exhaust stream; a second chamber configured to receive a purge gas; and a semi-permeable membrane separating the first chamber and the second chamber. The semi-permeable membrane is configured to allow water to diffuse therethrough, thereby removing water from the anode exhaust stream. The membrane dryer may further be configured to remove hydrogen from the anode exhaust stream.

Jolly, Stephen↗
DOE OSTI2021

Low-Cost Intermediate-Temperature Fuel-Flexible Protonic-Ceramic Fuel Cell and Stack

Large, centralized power plants are currently the most efficient way to convert fuels such as natural gas to electricity. Fuel cells, however, could become highly efficient generators across a range of sizes from tens of watts to megawatts. In particular, fuel cells with an electrical efficiency of 50% could displace small generators of 25 kilowatts (kW) or less in applications such as remote power, telecommunications, and residential cogeneration. Current 25 kW natural gas generators employing internal combustion engines are typically only 25-30% efficient and expensive to maintain. Furthermore, fuel cells could provide valuable services to the grid, such as the ability to ramp power up or down in response to load conditions. While there are different types of fuel cells, each with their strengths and weaknesses, fuel cells generally are very expensive. For example, lower temperature fuel cells can be started up quickly, but require highly pure hydrogen fuel and expensive catalysts. High-temperature fuel cells can operate on a range of fuels, but they have costly system components and can degrade rapidly.

30 DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION↗
DOE OSTI2021

Modular SOEC System for Efficient H 2 Production at High Current Density

The overall objective of the project was to demonstrate the potential of Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC) systems to produce hydrogen at a cost of $\$$2.00/kg H 2 or less (excluding delivery, compression, storage, and dispensing). An additional objective of the project was to enhance Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC) stack endurance and impart subsystem robustness for operation on load profiles compatible with intermittent renewable energy sources. The project was designed to achieve the overall objectives through a multi-disciplinary approach that included SOEC stack and materials development, systems development and optimization, techno-economic analyses, and ultimately the demonstration of a > 4 kg H 2 /day SOEC system. The scope of work included research and development efforts to develop an advanced, high temperature, water splitting (HTWS) system with superior performance and durability relative to the current state-of-the-art. In support of the aforementioned goals, the project activities included: 1) Develop and test cell materials with improved endurance at high current densities; 2) Design and fabricate a >4 kg H 2 /day SOEC stack optimized for high efficiency operation in the range of 1 - 2 A/cm 2 ; 3) Perform stack testing under simulated system conditions; 4) Perform systems analysis including configuration and parametric studies, to maximize SOEC system efficiency and minimize H 2 production costs; 5) Develop the conceptual design of a >4 kg H 2 /day thermally self-sustaining SOEC demonstration system including stack module and balance of plant (BoP).

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2021

SOFC Prototype System Test

The goal of this U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sponsored project is to test a 200 kWe thermally self-sustaining atmospheric-pressure solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) prototype system at a prominent site. Fuel Cell Energy Inc. (FCE) utilized the state-of-the-art SOFC technology of its wholly-owned subsidiary Versa Power Systems (VPS) to design, fabricate and test the 200 kW prototype system. The specific objectives of this project were to achieve an SOFC stack power degradation rate of ≤1.5% per 1000 hours for the 400 kW stand-alone prototype power system undergoing ≥ 5000 hours of steady state tests at thermally self-sustained normal operating conditions (NOC), and to verify the prospects for a high volume SOFC stack production cost below the DOE target of 225 dollars per kilowatt. Achieving these goals enables commercial natural gas fueled SOFC system deployment in the 2020 timeframe, which will eventually lead to SOFC technology that is viable for large scale central power generation applications.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2020

Pressure balancing of anode and cathode in a fuel cell system

A fuel cell system includes a fuel cell having an anode configured to receive anode feed gas and output anode exhaust, and a cathode configured to receive cathode feed gas and output cathode exhaust. The system further includes a pressurizing assembly downstream from the anode and an oxidizer downstream from the anode. The cathode feed gas is the anode exhaust that has been compressed in the pressurizing assembly and reacted with air in the oxidizer.

30 DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION↗
DOE OSTI2018

Pilot Test of Novel Electrochemical Membrane System for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Power Generation (Final Report)

The goal of this U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sponsored project under cooperative agreement DE-FE0026580 is to verify that Fuel Cell Energy’s (FCE) Electrochemical Membrane (ECM)-based Combined Electric Power and Carbon Separation (CEPACS) system can achieve at least 90% carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) capture rate from Pulverized Coal (PC) power plant flue gas with 95% CO2 purity at a cost of electricity (COE) 30% less than baseline CO 2 capture approaches. To progress towards the DOE’s ultimate carbon capture program goals, the specific objectives of Budget Period 1 (BP1) of the project are to perform a preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) and Environmental, Health and Safety (EH&S) Risk Assessment study, as well as to complete the detailed design of a pilot-scale ECM-based CEPACS system. This final technical report summarizes the results of the preliminary TEA and EH&S assessment of an ECM-based CEPACS system designed to capture and compress >90% of CO 2 from the flue gas of a reference 550 MW (net AC) Pulverized Coal (PC) Supercritical Steam Cycle Plant. Also included in this report is a summary of the detailed design for a pilot 3 MWe (flue gas equivalent) ECM-based CEPACS system designed to capture ≥90% of CO 2 from a PC plant flue gas slipstream and produce high-purity (≥95%) CO 2 . The pilot system is designed to process a slipstream of flue gas from the Unit 5 coal-fired boiler at the James M. Barry Electric Generating Station (Plant Barry). Plant Barry is located in Bucks, Alabama and is owned and operated by Alabama Power Company, a subsidiary of Southern Company. The TEA shows that the ECM-based CO 2 capture technology has an economic advantage over the existing CO 2 capture technology and meets the DOE’s cost target and performance goals for post-combustion CO 2 capture. The EH&S study includes the identification and quantification of the emissions from the CEPACS system. Properties of the waste including reactivity, flammability, corrosivity and toxicological effects are discussed along with the methods for minimization/elimination where applicable. The study shows that no major EH&S issues are expected to hinder commercialization of the ECM technology for large scale carbon capture applications. The detailed Front End Engineering Design (FEED) package for FCE’s MW-class ECM-based CO 2 capture pilot system is complete. It is designed in accordance with the project objectives and is now at a point where equipment/component procurement, skid final design and fabrication, and site preparation activities can begin in a follow-on project phase.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Fluidized Bed Production of Surface Functionalized Powders for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cathodes

Fuel cells offer tremendous potential for highly efficient conversion of fossil fuels to useable electrical power. Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) are particularly attractive, due to their high efficiency and capability to utilize either hydrogen or hydrocarbon fuels. Presently, there is considerable incentive to develop medium temperature (600 C to 800 C) SOFC's, in order to reduce the material compatibility issues and the engineering challenges associated with higher operating temperatures. Developing cathode materials with viable performance at intermediate temperatures is presently one of the key challenges in commercialization of solid oxide fuel cells. Recent works have shown the advantages of using surface functionalized cathode materials to improve SOFC performance at intermediate temperatures. However, present techniques for surface functionalization are expensive and difficult to implement in commercial SOFC production. In this SBIR Program, Structured Materials Industries, Inc. (SMI), along with partners FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCE) and the University of Connecticut (UConn), demonstrated a simple and economical process to produce surface functionalized cathode materials, based on fluidized bed technology. SMI has developed a variation on this technology, known as Fluidized Bed Chemical Vapor Deposition (FBCVD), and is presently implementing and commercializing FBCVD as an economical and scalable process to deposit coatings on powder materials. In Phase I of this Project, the SBIR team demonstrated technical feasibility of this approach for producing high performance SOFC cathode materials. In this Phase II Project, the SBIR team refined and optimized the FBCVD process and the surface functionalized cathode materials. Surface functionalized powders of various composition and morphology were produced at SMI using the FBCVD process. Electrochemical characterization of the powders was done at FCE under actual SOFC operating conditions. The results demonstrated the potential for significant improvement in SOFC performance. Long term testing at FCE showed the performance enhancement to be stable with time. Advanced materials characterization at UConn identified the composition and morphology of the materials. SMI's FBCVD processed materials represent a "drop in" replacement for present cathode materials, and should have minimal impact on SOFC production costs. SMI has designed a scaled up FBCVD system for high volume production of SOFC cathode materials, and is well positioned for future implementation and commercialization of the technology developed in this SBIR.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2018

Preliminary Technical Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Assessment – Pilot Test of Novel Electrochemical Membrane System for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Power Generation

A preliminary Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) assessment of the Electrochemical Membrane (ECM)-based CO2 capture system was conducted. This topical report presents the results of the EH&S assessment. The study was based on the carbon capture system size suitable for a reference 550 MW Pulverized Coal (PC) power plant. The ECM technology is derived from commercially available inorganic membranes; the same used in FuelCell Energy’s commercial fuel cell power plants and sold under the trade name SureSource (previously Direct FuelCell®). The ECM stacks are utilized in the Combined Electric Power (generation) And Carbon dioxide Separation (CEPACS) systems which can be deployed as add-ons to conventional power plants (Pulverized Coal, Combined Cycle, etc.) or industrial facilities to simultaneously produce power while capturing >90% of the CO2 from the host plant flue gas. The CEPACS system process description and review of process, ancillary and incidental gaseous (or air) and liquid (or water) emissions (discharge) as well as the solid waste are included in this report. The report also discusses the related handling requirements and properties of process discharge streams/waste, and the relevant regulatory requirements.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗