Molecular van der Waals Fluids in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics
Not Available
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Ghosh, Tushar K..
Not Available
Understanding gas flows in capillaries has many applications in modeling the transport of gases in nano-structured, porous, or fractured media. A network of capillaries can often approximate these media, and also information on gas-surface interactions obtained from capillary experiments can be used for modeling flows in these media. Experimental data on flows of different mixtures of He-Ar, He-N 2 , and He-air in the slip regime and in stainless steel capillaries at high temperatures were obtained by using a two-bulb apparatus. An accurate expression for the thermal creep slip coefficients with the Lennard-Jones potential parameters and diffuse-specular reflection gas-surface interaction conditions were then used to obtain the accommodation coefficients for the different gases. The experimental data are best described with values of accommodation coefficients in the range of 0.1–0.3 for He and 0.5–1.0 for Ar, N 2 , and air. Further, the use of values in this range is suggested for modeling gaseous flows in capillaries and nano-structured, porous, or fractured media if other direct measured values for a particular medium are unavailable.
Here, understanding the flow and diffusion (transport) of gases through nuclear graphite is of interest in both the prismatic and pebble bed high-temperature gas reactors (HTGRs), for normal operation and under accident conditions, for example, as related to graphite oxidation. Both the laminar and turbulent gaseous transport are of interest. It has also been noted that nuclear graphite can have pore sizes that can possibly lead to non-continuum transport, as the pore size can be comparable to the gaseous mean free path. We report measurements and analyzes of experiments performed with IG-11 graphite in the pressure range of 10 Pa to 14,700 Pa, 293 K, using Helium, and research grade xenon (99.999%), respectively. These values are in fair agreement with those reported for different graphites and gases by other investigators, but are also higher by six orders of magnitude than those reported for Kr permeability in a developmental very low permeability graphite-HXT-90. Our measured ratio of the Helium and Xenon permeabilities is about 4, different from $\sqrt{\frac{m_{Xe}}{m_{He}}}$ ≈ 5.72 that corresponds to diffuse reflection at the graphite surface for both gases. Simple analysis indicates that the two gases have slightly different accommodation coefficients (about 25%) with the graphite surface. However, there could also be other reasons, such as experimental uncertainties or the need for a more detailed analysis.
Not provided.
Calorimetric emissometers measure total hemispherical emissivity by measuring the heat transferred from a heated sample to its surroundings under a vacuum. The accuracy of emissometers standardized by the ASTM C835-06 are well understood. This work uses the Guide to the Evaluation of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) for the propagation uncertainties for an ASTM compliant emissometer. The GUM method was able to develop a measurement model and expressions to determine the uncertainty for other emissometers of this type. Data on ‘as-received’ Hastelloy X was used to develop a detailed uncertainty analysis of the emissivity measurement. Data on ‘as-received’ SS 347 and sandblasted A387 Gr. 91 and previous data by the group on A508/A533B were used to determine uncertainty over the ranges 0.16 to 0.81. For all samples, relative uncertainties in emissivities varied from 0.77% to 2.5% when using a fluxgate magnetometer sensor (FMS) to measure the DC heating current. Data on Hastelloy X using a Hall-effect sensor for DC current and low alloy steel showed the DC current and voltage across the test section to be dominate sources of uncertainty. When these sources were reduced, the specimen temperature and the surface area of the test sections were main sources of uncertainty in the emissivity, especially at higher temperatures. As thermal expansion of the surface was considered in the calculations, correlation between specimen temperature and surface area was examined. It was found to be a small contribution to emissivity's uncertainty despite the differences in linear CTE and its uncertainty for the materials analyzed in this study. For low temperatures, the chamber temperature can be a significant source of uncertainty if not sufficiently cooled. The GUM was also briefly compared to uncertainty from the 2nd and 3rd expansions of the Taylor series. We found that the results were the same when rounding to two significant figures.