Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Gilbo, Konstantin

Publications and source records attributed to Gilbo, Konstantin.

FY2021 ILAW Glass Ion-Exchange Rate Testing

Approximately 54 to 56 million gallons of radioactive mixed waste is currently stored in underground tanks at The United States Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Hanford site in the State of Washington. The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will provide DOE’s Office of River Protection (ORP) with a means of treating this waste by vitrification for subsequent disposal. The tank waste will be separated into low- and high-activity waste fractions, which will then be vitrified respectively into Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) and Immobilized High-Level Waste (IHLW) products. The ILAW product will be disposed of in an engineered facility – the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) – on the Hanford site, while the IHLW product will be directed to the national deep geological disposal facility for high-level nuclear waste. The ILAW and IHLW products must meet a variety of requirements with respect to protection of the environment before they can be accepted for disposal. To capitalize on the success of the FY19 and FY20 Atkins/VSL test results on six glasses, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) has contracted with Atkins/VSL to collect IEX data on four more ILAW glasses using PFT, the results of which are the subject of the present report. The work described herein was performed according to a Test Plan that is responsive to the corresponding WRPS scope of work.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

ILAW Glass Ion-Exchange Rate Testing (Final Report FY2020)

About 50 million gallons of high-level mixed waste is currently stored in underground tanks at The United States Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Hanford site in the State of Washington. The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will provide DOE’s Office of River Protection (ORP) with a means of treating this waste by vitrification for subsequent disposal. The tank waste will be separated into low- and high-activity waste fractions, which will then be vitrified respectively into Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) and Immobilized High-Level Waste (IHLW) products. The ILAW product will be disposed of in an engineered facility – the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) – on the Hanford site, while the IHLW product will be directed to the national deep geological disposal facility for high-level nuclear waste. The ILAW and IHLW products must meet a variety of requirements with respect to protection of the environment before they can be accepted for disposal.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

FY2019 ILAW Glass Ion Exchange Rate Testing (Final Report)

About 50 million gallons of high-level mixed waste is currently stored in underground tanks at The United States Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Hanford site in the State of Washington. The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will provide DOE’s Office of River Protection (ORP) with a means of treating this waste by vitrification for subsequent disposal. The tank waste will be separated into low- and high-activity waste fractions, which will then be vitrified respectively into Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) and Immobilized High-Level Waste (IHLW) products. The ILAW product will be disposed of in an engineered facility - the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) - on the Hanford site, while the IHLW product is designed for acceptance into a national deep geological disposal facility for high-level nuclear waste. The ILAW and IHLW products must meet a variety of requirements with respect to protection of the environment before they can be accepted for disposal.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Effects of Blending and In-Tank Pretreatment on Direct Feed Hanford High Level Waste Vitrification - 18434

A direct feed high level waste (DFHLW) option is under consideration for early operations of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). In this option, the Pretreatment Facility would be bypassed in order to support an earlier start-up of the HLW Vitrification Facility. For HLW, this would mean that ultrafiltration and caustic leaching that would otherwise have been performed either would not be performed or would be replaced by interim pretreatment functions such as in-tank washings. These changes could result in higher aluminum contents, higher chromium contents, higher fractions of supernate, and lower solids contents in the HLW feed. As a result, glass formulations and downstream vitrification operations will be impacted. In the present work, we investigate the effects of various waste blending and in-tank pretreatment scenarios on DFHLW glass waste loadings, canister counts, and processing rates. Eleven source tanks and five waste groups were selected for the studies of waste blending. In addition, the five waste groups selected were the subjects of an in-tank pretreatment study. Glass property-composition models and melter test data were used to calculate waste loadings, canister counts, processing rates, and treatment durations for a range of DFHLW scenarios. The processing scenarios were defined by the types of waste blending and in-tank pretreatment that were assumed. Blending cases were evaluated that ranged between the 'No Blend' and 'Total Blend' extremes and included pairwise blending (blending of two source tanks, either completely or in various proportions) and macro-batches formed from various combinations of the source tanks. Over 36,000 possible pairwise blending scenarios were evaluated and an optimal retrieval/blending sequence was identified. The waste loading of this optimal sequence is within 0.03 wt% of the 'Total Blend' case. Further, a total of 38 retrieval sequences were identified that have waste loadings within 0.1 wt% of the 'Total Blend' case. To evaluate the effects of in-tank pretreatment, an in-tank wash/settle/decant process was assumed and tank-specific wash factors were employed. Washing of the macro-batch blends gave a general increase in HLW loading, decrease in canister count, and decrease in glass yield. Glass yields are towards the low end of the values expected for the WTP, which could lead to lower than nominal glass production rates. The waste loading increases and canister count reductions with washing were small for two of the wastes indicating that direct treatment of the unwashed waste may be practical. For wastes that are relatively low in sulfate and halides, excessive washing is counterproductive. The results highlight the importance of maintaining high solids content in the HLW feed to maintain glass production rates. The results also illustrate that the optimum washing strategy will need to be evaluated on a tank-to-tank basis. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

K-3 Refractory Corrosion and Sulfate Solubility Model Enhancement (Final Report)

As higher waste loading LAW glasses are formulated, sulfate solubility and K-3 refractory corrosion are two properties that become increasingly constraining; however, WTP baseline models were not developed for these properties. In previous work for ORP, VSL/Atkins developed preliminary glass property-composition models that relate LAW glass composition to these two essential properties to support the implementation of the higher waste loading LAW glass formulations at the WTP. The development of the initial LAW glass property-composition models for K-3 refractory corrosion and sulfate solubility was completed in 2015. The present work scope focused on enhancement of these models and included augmentation of property-composition datasets for these two properties with newly available data, review of the updated datasets, and development of enhanced models.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Development of Nepheline Models for Hanford HLW Glass

The work included the design, fabrication, and characterization of a matrix of 35 new highAl HLW glasses and assessment and development of new models for nepheline formation.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Calcium Phosphate Constraints in HLW Glasses: Phosphate Liquidus Model

About 50 million gallons of high-level mixed waste is currently stored in underground tanks at the United States Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Hanford site in the State of Washington. The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will provide DOE’s Office of River Protection (ORP) with a means of treating this waste by vitrification for subsequent disposal. The tank waste will be separated into low- and high-activity waste fractions, which will then be vitrified respectively into Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) and Immobilized High Level Waste (IHLW) products. The ILAW product will be disposed in an engineered facility on the Hanford site while the IHLW product is designed for acceptance into a national geological disposal facility for high-level nuclear waste. The ILAW and IHLW products must meet a variety of requirements before they can be accepted for disposal. Glass property-composition models will be used to control the vitrification process at the WTP to ensure that the glass meets product quality and processability requirements. The quality and the validity ranges of the property-composition models and the supporting database will greatly influence waste treatment operations, including the waste loading that is achievable in the glass for each waste composition. The current baseline models for operation of the WTP were developed under the Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI) WTP contract. These models were based on LAW and HLW glass property data over a range of compositions that was guided primarily by the WTP contract and the set of tanks specified therein. The HLW testing was directed towards waste streams from the then-planned early feed tanks for the WTP (i.e., AZ-101, AZ-102, C-106/AY-102, and C-104/AY-101). These wastes are high in iron (AZ-101, AZ-102, and C-106/AY-102) or thorium (C-104/AY-101). While the baseline models may be adequate for commissioning of the facility and processing of the specified tanks, refinements and extensions or augmentations of these models will be required to process the balance of the tank waste inventory. The overall mission of the WTP will require the immobilization of tank waste compositions that are variously dominated by mixtures of aluminum, chromium, bismuth, iron, phosphorous, zirconium, and sulfur compounds as waste-loading-limiting components. Further, the WTP contract includes minimum waste loading requirements that are generally rather modest while loadings significantly higher than those in the current baseline are likely achievable. In order to achieve these higher waste loadings and to expand the applicable composition regions, new models will be needed to support the optimized operation of the WTP. Since the development of the baseline WTP models, ORP directed a program of work at the Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) to examine various approaches for optimization of the performance of the WTP, including increasing the waste loadings in the LAW and HLW glass products. That work involved HLW rich in Al, Al+Na, Cr, Bi, S, Zr, Sr, P and Fe, in contrast to old baseline models that were based mostly on HLW tanks that were high in Fe, with one other that was also high in Th. Glass property data collected under the ORP program were compiled and combined with data collected to develop the WTP models. The combined databases have been used to update pre-existing HLW composition models or to develop new models for properties such as Product Consistency Test (PCT) responses, spinel crystallization (one-percent crystal fraction temperature, T 1% ), melt viscosity, melt electrical conductivity, nepheline formation upon slow cooling (i.e., Canister Centerline Cooling [CCC]), and Toxicity Characteristic Leach Procedure (TCLP) Cd response. While spinel is typically the most commonly occurring phase in HLW glasses, other phases can be limiting depending on the waste and glass composition. For example, various phosphate phases can become important as the phosphorus content increases. Lithium phosphate crystallization can impact PCT releases of HLW glasses, while calcium phosphate phases forming in the cold-cap can deleteriously impact feed processing in the melter. At present, however, no models exist that relate glass composition and crystallization of phosphate phases in general and calcium phosphate in particular. The present work was therefore directed towards the initial development of such models. Future work may be directed at studying amorphous phase separation in high phosphate HLW glasses. Within the River Protection Project, feed compositions are projected using the Hanford Tank Waste Operations Simulator (HTWOS), a dynamic computer model that tracks the waste through storage, retrieval, feed staging, and treatment processes. A review of the HTWOS data shows that WTP will process 4106 batches of HLW glass for the overall mission (System Plan Rev. 6, ORP-11242), each with its own waste feed and glass composition. Some of the projected HTWOS feed batches are expected to have relatively high concentrations of phosphorous compared to typical HLW streams. In the 4106 batches of HLW for the overall WTP mission P 2 O 5 varies from 0.59 wt% to 13.00 wt%, with 95 batches containing at least 10 wt% P 2 O 5 . Occurrences of phosphate crystals have commonly been noted in glasses with high bismuth and phosphorus contents. In addition, recently collected data from a set of statistically designed HLW matrix glasses prepared and characterized to support enhancement of the HLW glass property-composition models identified apatite in a number of glass samples. However, the current HLW model for crystallization (one-percent crystal fraction temperature) is applicable only to spinel crystallization in glasses. Previous projections of waste loadings and glass volume (such as those in System Plan Rev. 6, ORP-11242) have used preliminary constraints for calcium phosphate crystallization that are based on the limited available data. Additional data and improved constraints or, preferably, models that relate glass composition to crystallization of phosphate-containing phases, are therefore needed to support HLW vitrification at the WTP. The present study focuses on the development of such a model based on data from previously characterized glasses and a set of newly fabricated glasses.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

LAW Glass Property-Composition Models for K-3 Refractory Corrosion and Sulfate Solubility

LAW glass development work for ORP has focused on increasing waste loading in the glasses, which requires higher sulfur and alkali concentrations in the glasses. Two of the properties of LAW glasses that constrain increases in sulfur and alkali concentrations are sulfate solubility and K-3 refractory corrosion. The present work was focused on compiling available property-composition data on sulfate solubility and K-3 refractory corrosion and developing models that correlate these properties to glass composition. This work is the first phase of a multi-year effort aimed at the development of LAW glass property-composition models for these two properties.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Vitrification Tests with Potential Technetium Capture Streams

About 50 million gallons of high-level waste is currently stored in underground tanks at The United States Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Hanford site in the State of Washington. The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will provide DOE’s Office of River Protection (ORP) with a means of treating this waste by vitrification for subsequent disposal. The tank waste will be separated into low- and high-activity waste fractions, which will then be vitrified respectively into Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) and Immobilized High Level Waste (IHLW) products. The ILAW product will be disposed in an engineered facility on the Hanford site while the IHLW product is designed for acceptance at a national deep geological disposal facility for high-level nuclear waste. The ILAW and IHLW products must meet a variety of requirements with respect to protection of the environment before they can be accepted for disposal. The Low Activity Waste (LAW) and High-Level Waste (HLW) at Hanford will be vitrified in Joule Heated Ceramic Melters (JHCMs) to produce stable products for disposal. Technetium is an important radioactive component in the Hanford tank waste and is typically one of the principal contributors to risk in performance assessments for the ILAW disposal facility. Technetium is also one of the more volatile radionuclides and the retention of technetium in the glass under the high temperature conditions prevailing during vitrification can vary over a relatively wide range depending on the feed composition, feed chemistry, and melter operating parameters. In support of the WTP Project, the Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) at The Catholic University of America (CUA) and EnergySolutions have developed and tested glass formulations for WTP waste envelopes to provide data to meet the WTP contract requirements and to support system design activities. That work is based upon small-scale batch melts (“crucible melts”) using waste simulants. Glass compositions suitable for processing the tank waste streams for the WTP have been identified and tested for processing and product quality requirements at various scales, ranging from crucible melts of a few grams, up to the LAW Pilot Melter at processing rates in excess of 6600 kg/day (2000 kg/m 2 /day). Recent testing performed at VSL for Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) has investigated the baseline “single-pass” retention of technetium over the range of WTP LAW feed compositions and glass formulations as well as the development of potential modifications to the baseline that could increase the single-pass retention. For the WTP melter systems, the liquid waste streams from the primary off-gas system components are recycled back to the pretreatment facility and, ultimately, to subsequent melter feed batches. Such a recycle loop can greatly increase the overall retention of volatile constituents in the glass product over the single-pass value. Accordingly, more recent testing at VSL has been conducted on a melter system that incorporates a recycle flow sheet. The results from that work have provided important performance data for the unit operations in the primary off-gas system with respect to technetium capture and recycle, which is crucial in assessing the amount of technetium that ultimately reports to non-glass waste forms.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗