Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Glenn Orton

Publications and source records attributed to Glenn Orton.

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

The Temporal Brightening of Uranus’ Northern Polar Hood from HST/WFC3 & HST/STIS Observations

Hubble Space Telescope Wide-Field Camera 3 (HST/WFC3) observations spanning 2015 to 2021 confirm a brightening of Uranus' north polar hood feature with time. The vertical aerosol model of Irwin et al. (2023, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02047-0) (IRW23), consisting of a deep haze layer based at ∼5 bar, a 1–2 bar haze layer, and an extended haze rising up from the 1–2 bar layer, was applied to retrievals on HST Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) (HST/STIS) observations (Sromovsky et al., 2014, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2014.05.016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2018.06.026) revealing a reduction in cloud-top CH4 volume mixing ratio (VMR) (i.e., above the deep ∼5 bar haze) by an average of 0.0019 ± 0.0003 between 40–80◦N (∼10% average reduction) from 2012 to 2015. A combination of latitudinal retrievals on the HST/WFC3 and HST/STIS data sets, again employing the IRW23 model, reveal a temporal thickening of the 1–2 bar haze layer to be the main cause of the polar hood brightening, finding an average increase in integrated opacity of 1.09 ± 0.08 (∼33% increase) at 0.8 µm north of ∼45°N, concurrent with a decrease in the imaginary refractive index spectrum of the 1–2 bar haze layer north of ∼40°N and longwards of ∼0.7 µm. Small contributions to the brightening were found from a thickening of the deep aerosol layer, with an average increase in integrated opacity of 0.6 ± 0.1 (58% increase) north of 45°N between 2012 and 2015, and from the aforementioned decrease in CH4 VMR. Our results are consistent with the slowing of a stratospheric meridional circulation, exhibiting subsidence at the poles.

Arjuna James↗
NASA NTRS2020

The Effects of Waves on the Meridional Thermal Structure of Jupiter's Stratosphere

A thermal oscillation in Jupiter’s equatorial stratosphere, thought to have∼4Earth year period, was first discovered in 7.8μm imaging observations from the 1980s and 1990s. Such imaging observations were sensitive to the 10–20hPa pressure region in the atmosphere. More recent 7.8μm long-slit high-spectroscopic observations from 2012–2017 taken using the Texas Echelon cross-dispersed Echelle Spectrograph (TEXES), mounted on the NASA Infrared Tele-scope Facility (IRTF), have vertically resolved this phenomenon’s structure, and show it spans a range of pressure from 2–20 hPa. The TEXES instrument was mounted on the Gemini North telescope in March 2017, improving the diffraction-limited spatial resolution by a factor of∼2.5 compared to that offered by the IRTF. This Gemini spatial scale sensitivity study was performed in support of the longer-termed Jupiter monitoring being performed at the IRTF. We find that the spatial resolution afforded by the smaller 3-m IRTF is sufficient to spatially resolve the 3-D structure of Jupiter’s equatorial stratospheric oscillation by comparing the thermal retrievals of IRTF and Gemini observations. We then performed numerical simulations in a general circulation model to investigate how the structure of Jupiter’s stratosphere responds to changes in the latitudinal extent of wave forcing in the troposphere. We find our simulations produce a lower limit in meridional wave forcing of±7◦(plane to centric coordinates) centered about the equator. This likely remains constant over time in order to produce off-equatorial thermal oscillations at±13◦, consistent with observations spanning nearly four decades.

Richard G. Cosentino↗
NASA NTRS2020

Fluctuations in Jupiter’s Equatorial Stratospheric Oscillation

The equatorial stratospheres of the Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn all exhibit a remarkable periodic oscillation of their temperatures and winds with height. Earth’s Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) and Saturn’s Quasi-Periodic Equatorial Oscillation (QPO) have recently been observed to experience disruptions in their vertical structure as a consequence of atmospheric events occurring far from the equator. Here we reveal that Jupiter’s Quasi-Quadrennial Oscillation (QQO) can also be perturbed by strong tropospheric activity at the equatorial and off-equatorial latitudes. Observations of Jupiter’s stratospheric temperatures between 1980 and 2011 show two significantly different periods for the QQO, with a 5.7-year period between 1980 and 1990 and a 3.9-year period between 1996 and 2006. Major disruptions to the predicted QQO pattern in 1992 and 2007 coincided with dramatic planetary-scale disturbances in the equatorial and low-latitude troposphere, suggesting that they are connected to vertically propagating waves generated by meteorological sources in the deeper troposphere (i.e. 500-4000 mbar pressures). Disruptions in Jupiter’s periodic oscillations are thus inherently different than those at Saturn or the Earth. This interconnectivity between the troposphere and stratosphere that is likely common to all planetary atmospheres shows that seemingly regular cycles of variability can switch between different modes when subjected to extreme meteorological events

Arrate Antunano↗
NASA NTRS2020

Residual Study: Testing Jupiter Atmosphere Models Against Juno MWR Observations

The Juno spacecraft provides unique close-up views of Jupiter underneath the synchrotron radiation belts while circling Jupiter in its 53-day orbits. The microwave radiometer (MWR) onboard measures Jupiter thermal radiation at wavelengths between 1.37 and 50 cm, penetrating the atmosphere to a pressure of a few hundred bars and greater. The mission provides the first measurements of Jupiter's deep atmosphere, down to ~250 bars in pressure, constraining the vertical distributions of its kinetic temperature and constituents. As a result, vertical structure models of Jupiter's atmosphere may now be tested by comparison with MWR data. Taking into account the MWR beam patterns and observation geometries, we test several published Jupiter atmospheric models against MWR data. Our residual analysis confirms Li et al.'s (2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073159) result that ammonia depletion persists down to 50–60 bars where ground-based Very Large Array was not able to observe. We also present an extension of the study that iteratively improves the input model and generates Jupiter brightness temperature maps which best match the MWR data. A feature of Juno's north-to-south scanning approach is that latitudinal structure is more easily obtained than longitudinal, and the creation of optimum two-dimensional maps is addressed in this approach.

Zhimeng Zhang↗