Engineering topics
Grebow, Dan
Publications and source records attributed to Grebow, Dan.
Dawn Safing Approach to Ceres Re-Design
In mid-2014 the Dawn team finalized preparations for the spacecraft’s approach to Ceres. The design was the product of careful planning that began several years in advance, when the spacecraft left Vesta in September 2012. However, a few months prior to the anticipated start of approach, the spacecraft entered a safe mode. While temporary loss of thrust for ion propulsion missions is usually not mission-critical, it still presents many challenges. The safing event occurred at a time when thrusting to match Ceres’ orbital velocity was most effective, which meant the spacecraft must fly past Ceres before capturing into orbit. The new approach geometry changed the team’s strategy for navigating the spacecraft safely into orbit around Ceres with optical data. In this paper we describe the challenges of navigating the Dawn spacecraft into orbit around Ceres, including the safing event and re-design of the approach architecture.
Design and Execution of Dawn HAMO to LAMO Transfer at Ceres
On October 23, 2015, the Dawn spacecraft left the High Altitude Mapping Orbit (HAMO) around Ceres and began its final decent to the Low Altitude Mapping Orbit (LAMO), arriving on December 15. The transfer between the two science orbits, a tight spiraling trajectory with over 100 revolutions, required the operations team to perform weekly maneuver designs for a period of 50 days. While the first six weeks of the transfer executed as planned, unexpectedly the spacecraft incurred a multi-sigma delivery error to the final science orbit that was subsequently clean-up at the first orbit maintenance maneuver. In this paper we discuss the design architecture for the transfer in detail, including challenges the team faced in flying the transfer and lessons learned.
Forward Modeling of Ceres' Gravity Field for Planetary Protection Assessment
No abstract available
Forward Modeling of Ceres' Gravity Field for Planetary Protection Assessment
The Dawn spacecraft arrived at the dwarf planet Ceres in early 2015 after a two and a half-year cruise in deep space after departing Vesta. The nominal plan for Dawn included successively lower science orbits, the last of which is called the Low Altitude Mapping Orbit that also serves as the disposal orbit after the end of mission. Prior to Dawn’s arrival at Ceres, it was identified that Dawn would have to meet planetary protection requirements at Ceres by remaining on a stable orbit for 20 years past the end of the mission. With little a priori knowledge on Ceres’ interior we analyzed what gravitational perturbations influence the long-term dynamical evolution of Dawn around Ceres and validated that the gravitational model of Ceres with the then-current best estimate of the density distribution model does not exceed the permissible bounds. The forward modeling of gravity fields from various shape models and density distribution was deemed valid to satisfy the planetary protection guidelines. This analysis was further confirmed after a new shape model based on the actual optical images was created. The gravity field as measured in the High Altitude Mapping Orbit also fits within the bounds of gravitational field studied pre-arrival at Ceres to substantiate our methodology used to satisfy the planetary protection requirement.
Forward Modeling of Ceres' Gravity Field for Planetary Protection
No abstract available
Concurrent Mission Design of NEA Scout and Lunar Flashlight, Solar Sail Cubesat Missions
No abstract available
Using Gravity Assists in the Earth-moon System as a Gateway to the Solar System
For spacecraft departing the Earth - Moon system, lunar flybys can significantly increase the hype rbolic escape energy (C3, in km 2 /sec 2 ) for a modest increase in flight time. Within ~2 months, lunar flybys can produce a C3 of ~2. Over 4 - 6 months, lunar flybys alone can increase the C3 to ~4.5, or they can provide for additional periapsis burns to increase the C3 from ~2 -3 to 10 or more, suitable for planetary missions. A lunar flyby departure can be followed by additional ∆ -V (such as that efficiently provided by a low thrust system, eg. Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP)) to raise the Earth - relative velocity (at a ratio of more than 2:1) before a subsequent Earth flyby, which redirects that velocity to a more di stant target, all within not much more than a year. This paper describes the applicability of lunar flybys for different flight times and propulsi on systems, and illustrates this with instances of past usage and future possibilities. Examples discussed i nclude ISEE - 3, Nozomi, STEREO, 2018 Mars studies (which showed an 8% payload increase), and missions to Near Earth Objects (NEOs). In addition, the options for the achieving the initial lunar flyby are systematically discussed, with a view towards their p ractical use with in a compact launch period. In particular, we show that launches to geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO) as a secondary payload provide a feasible means of obtaining a lunar flyby for an acceptable cost, even for SEP systems that cannot ea sily deliver large ∆ - Vs at periapsis. Taken together, these results comprise a myriad of options for increasing the mission performance, by the efficient use of lunar flybys within an acceptable extension of the flight time.
Using Gravity Assists in the Earth-moon System as a Gateway to the Solar System
For spacecraft departing the Earth - Moon system, lunar flybys can significantly increase the hyperbolic escape energy (C3, in km (exp 2) /sec (exp 2) ) for a modest increase in flight time. Within approx 2 months, lunar flybys can produce a C3 of approx 2. Over 4 - 6 months, lunar flybys alone can increase the C3 to approx 4.5, or they can provide for additional periapsis burns to increase the C3 from approx 2 -3 to 10 or more, suitable for planetary missions. A lunar flyby departure can be followed by additional delta -V (such as that efficiently provided by a low thrust system, eg. Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP)) to raise the Earth - relative velocity (at a ratio of more than 2:1) before a subsequent Earth flyby, which redirects that velocity to a more distant target, all within not more than a year. This paper describes the applicability of lunar flybys for different flight times and propulsion systems, and illustrates this with instances of past usage and future possibilities. Examples discussed include ISEE-3, Nozomi, STEREO, 2018 Mars studies (which showed an 8% payload increase), and missions to Near Earth Objects (NEOs). In addition, the options for the achieving the initial lunar flyby are systematically discussed, with a view towards their practical use within a compact launch period. In particular, we show that launches to geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO) as a secondary payload provide a feasible means of obtaining a lunar flyby for an acceptable cost, even for SEP systems that cannot easily deliver large delta-Vs at periapsis. Taken together, these results comprise a myriad of options for increasing the mission performance, by the efficient use of lunar flybys within an acceptable extension of the flight time.