Engineering topics

Grebow, Daniel J.

Publications and source records attributed to Grebow, Daniel J..

11 records

NASA NTRS2020

Missed Thrust Analysis and Design for Low Thrust Cislunar Transfers

This paper details the analysis of the missed thrust problem for low thrust cislunar transfers. Missed thrust analysis is completed for a reference NRHO to DRO transfer that is designed to maximize the final mass without consideration of robustness to unexpected loss of thrust. A new missed thrust design method is presented to include the robustness of the transfer as part of the optimization problem by including a minimal number of branching trajectories tied to the start of thrust arcs in the reference transfer and optimizing them all simultaneously. Results from variations of this approach are presented for and compared to the reference transfer designed without consideration for missed thrust. The results show that this new method can reduce the additional propellant required for recovery from an unexpected 7-day outage by up to 90% without significant increase to the propellant required to complete the reference transfer.

Grebow, Daniel J.↗

NASA NTRS2017

MColl: Monte Collocation Trajectory Design Tool

In this paper we describe a prototype low-thrust optimization software being developed at JPL. The software tool is based on a collocation algorithm where a trajectory discretization is fitted and adjusted until the underlying dynamics equations of motion are satisfied. The resulting large scale non-linear programming problem may either be optimized with IPOPT or KNITRO. The user specifies path constraints, boundary constraints, and objectives. We describe the collocation algorithm as well as various mesh refinement strategies, and apply the software tool to solve various example problems.

Grebow, Daniel J.↗

NASA NTRS2016

Design and Execution of Dawn HAMO to LAMO Transfer at Ceres

On October 23, 2015, the Dawn spacecraft left the High Altitude Mapping Orbit (HAMO) around Ceres and began its final decent to the Low Altitude Mapping Orbit (LAMO), arriving on December 15. The transfer between the two science orbits, a tight spiraling trajectory with over 100 revolutions, required the operations team to perform weekly maneuver designs for a period of 50 days. While the first six weeks of the transfer executed as planned, unexpectedly the spacecraft incurred a multi-sigma delivery error to the final science orbit that was subsequently clean-up at the first orbit maintenance maneuver. In this paper we discuss the design architecture for the transfer in detail, including challenges the team faced in flying the transfer and lessons learned.

Grebow, Daniel J.↗

NASA NTRS2016

Dawn's Mission at Ceres

Dawn is NASA's ninth Discovery class mission. The Dawn spacecraft was designed to orbit both the giant asteroid Vesta and the dwarf planet Ceres in succession, a mission only made possible by the high efficiency of ion propulsion. While the same spacecraft visited both bodies, the mission planning and maneuver execution at the two bodies were necessarily very different. The mission at Vesta benefited from at least three functioningreaction control wheels. At Ceres, all maneuvering and coasting during transfers was done without reaction wheel control due to the loss of the second of four wheels while departing Vesta. Loss of the second wheel made conserving attitude control propellant (hydrazine) critical to achieving mission success at Ceres. To save hydrazine, avoiding unnecessary coasting and attitude turns became essential during the interplanetary cruise to Ceres and for all transfers once at Ceres. In contrast, operations at Vesta did not need to avoid coasting. Operating at Ceres requires being farther from the Sun. Greaterheliocentric distances (approaching 3 AU (Astronomical Units) make Dawn's attitude control constraints while maneuvering more restrictive as a result of reduced control authority.

Whiffen, Gregory J.↗

NASA NTRS2016

Dawn Safing Approach to Ceres Re-Design

In mid-2014 the Dawn team finalized preparations for the spacecraft’s approach to Ceres. The design was the product of careful planning that began several years in advance, when the spacecraft left Vesta in September 2012. However, a few months prior to the anticipated start of approach, the spacecraft entered a safe mode. While temporary loss of thrust for ion propulsion missions is usually not mission-critical, it still presents many challenges. The safing event occurred at a time when thrusting to match Ceres’ orbital velocity was most effective, which meant the spacecraft must fly past Ceres before capturing into orbit. The new approach geometry changed the team’s strategy for navigating the spacecraft safely into orbit around Ceres with optical data. In this paper we describe the challenges of navigating the Dawn spacecraft into orbit around Ceres, including the safing event and re-design of the approach architecture.

Grebow, Daniel J.↗

NASA NTRS2013

Mission Design for Global Mapping Orbits at Primitive Bodies

Global mapping campaigns are part of most primitive body exploration missions. However, designing a mapping orbit without station keeping maneuvers is challenging due to the highly perturbed environment near small bodies. In this paper, we present a new design methodology to support mapping campaigns using 'quasi-terminator' orbits, a class of quasi-periodic orbits that exist in the vicinity of the well-known terminator orbits. The inherent stability of quasi-terminator trajectories and their wide variety of viewing geometries make them a very compelling option for mapping campaigns. A high-fidelity test case solution is also presented to prove the existence of these mapping orbits in full ephemeris.

quasi-periodic orbits↗

NASA NTRS2013

Design of Quasi-Terminator Orbits near Primitive Bodies

Quasi-terminator orbits are a class of quasi-periodic orbits around a primitive body that exist in the vicinity of the well-known terminator orbits. The inherent stability of quasi-terminator trajectories and their wide variety of viewing geometries make them a very compelling option for primitive body mapping missions. In this paper, we discuss orbit design methodologies for selection of an appropriate quasi-terminator orbit that would meet the needs of a specific mission. Convergence of these orbits in an eccentric, higher-fidelity model is also discussed with an example case at Bennu, the target of the upcoming NASA's OSIRIS-REx mission.

mapping↗

NASA NTRS2013

Characteristics of Quasi-Terminator Orbits Near Primitive Bodies

Quasi-terminator orbits are introduced as a class of quasi-periodic trajectories in the solar radiation pressure (SRP) perturbed Hill dynamics. These orbits offer significant displacements along the Sun-direction without the need for station-keeping maneuvers. Thus, quasi-terminator orbits have application to primitive-body missions, where a variety of observation geometries relative to the Sun (or other directions) can be achieved. This paper describes the characteristics of these orbits as a function of normalized SRP strength and invariant torus frequency ratio and presents a discussion of mission design considerations for a global surface mapping orbit design.

orbital motions↗

NASA NTRS2012

Target Search and Selection for the DI/EPOXI Spacecraft

Upon completion of the Hartley 2 flyby in November 2010, the Deep Impact (DI) spacecraft resided in a solar orbit without possibility for gravity assist with any large body. Conservative estimates of remaining fuel were enough to provide only an 18 m/s impulse on the spacecraft. We present our method and results of our systematic scan of potential small body encounters for DI, and our criteria to narrow the selection to the asteroid 2002 GT as the target flyby body. The mission profile has two deterministic maneuvers to achieve the encounter, the first of which executed on November 25, 2011.

Deep Impact (DI)↗

NASA NTRS2012

Target Search & Selection for the DI/EPOXI Spacecraft

Grebow, Daniel J.↗

NASA NTRS2011

Multi-Body Capture to Low-altitude Circular Orbits at Europa

For capture to a 200-km circular orbit around Europa, millions of different points along the orbit are simulated in the Jupiter-Europa Restricted 3-Body Problem. The transfers exist as members of families of trajectories, where certain families consistently outperform the others. The trajectories are not sensitive to changes in inclination for the final circular orbit. The top performing trajectories appear to follow the invariant manifolds of L2 Lyapunov orbits for capture into a retrograde orbit, and in some cases saving up to 40% of the from the patched 2-body problem. Transfers are attached to the current nominal mission for NASA's Jupiter-Europa Orbiter, where the total cost is roughly 100 m/s less than the baseline mission.

Jupiter-Europa Orbiter (JEO)↗