Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Greg Holt

Publications and source records attributed to Greg Holt.

Historical Retrospective on Orion GNC Design

On November 16, 2022, Artemis I successfully launched and began a nearly 26-day journey returning a human-rated spacecraft to the Moon for the first time in fifty years. The mission was a huge success and once again the world's attention was focused on the Moon. This paper will take a step back in time over the seventeen-plus years of design and development of the Orion Guidance Navigation and Control (GNC) system that carried the spacecraft 1.4 million miles around the Moon and landed safely back on earth off the coast of San Diego California. Key design decisions (good and not so good) and "first-ever" capabilities will be chronicled. This paper will explore such things as the most advanced on-board targeting system ever flown on a spacecraft, never-been-done-before autonomous planetary Optical Navigation, and the first-ever truly skip entry guided to the desired target within a few miles.

Guidance Navigation and Control↗

Artemis I Optical Navigation System Performance

This paper summarizes the assessment of the Optical Navigation Flight Test Objective (FTO) during the flight of Artemis I. The Optical Navigation (OpNav) System was tested under a variety of range, target, and lighting conditions to evaluate the performance compared to the pre-flight predicted error models. In general, OpNav performed very well – successfully processing over a thousand images of starfields, Earth, and Moon. The performance of the algorithm when processing Moon images matched the pre-flight expected error models. The errors when processing Earth images were notably higher than the pre-flight models predicted, however this was found to be due to an over-estimation of the atmosphere bias used in the tuning of the algorithm. After the bias was re-tuned and the images reprocessed, performance significantly improved.

GNC↗

Backup Optical Navigation Attitude for Artemis-1 Backup Attitude Ground Tool

The Backup Optical Navigation Attitude (BONA) software was developed as a response to the Artemis1 Power Distribution Unit (PDU) hardware problems found early in 2021. The hardware problem, a capacitor installed incorrectly, removes the intended redundant path for which the PDU can relay its power and data to attached devices. Specific to the BONA context, the concern is that a failure of the single remaining path in this PDU would lead to an inability to communicate with one of the two-star trackers (STs) on Orion. By flight rule, being reduced to a single star tracker means an immediate turn around end-of-mission. The BONA software is not intended to extend the mission, but instead act as a single star tracker attitude confirmation tool. Insurance, if you will, for the Orion project that a ground tool is available to compare the single remaining ST results with optical navigation images retrieved during the mission. Engineers operating BONA in the Mission Control Center (MCC) Mission Evaluation Room (MER) will analyze the downlinked star field images and based on the stars identified and known time of image, derive vehicle attitude estimates, which can be compared with the ST results. Potentially, in extreme situations, and with expert recommendation, the derivations could lead to navigation state updates being commanded to Orion.

GNC↗

Optical Navigation Attitude Estimation and Calibration Performance Improvement using Outlier Rejection

Spacecraft optical navigation (OpNav) systems process a sequence of images of celestial bodies against a starfield background to estimate the position and velocity of the vehicle. While attitude is sometimes available from an onboard star tracker, it is often desirable to recognize the background stars in the OpNav images to better align the image. While many image processing algorithms exist for finding stars, efficiency and reliability remain key issues in the presence of extended bodies(e.g. the Moon, Earth), especially when attempting to solve the full lost-in-space problem. Some star outliers(stars identified with high residuals)could appear in the camera field of view, however using them in the attitude estimation or camera calibration would lead to less accurate results. Therefore, we require new and robust approaches to remove these outliers before any further processing. The emphasis of the work is on developing a simple and robust iterative technique to detect and reject the outliers which could be found in any frame during the lost in space attitude determination or during the camera calibration. These outliers are determined based on the residuals of the centroids of the detected stars and the corresponding location using the star catalog. If the residuals exceed a predetermined threshold value, the object will be detected as an outlier and will be removed before another attitude determination and calibration iteration is performed. The performance for both attitude determination and on-orbit camera calibration are improved by an almost two-fold increase in accuracy when applying this outlier rejection technique.

OpNav↗

Cumulative Distribution Overlap Technique for Artemis Mission Public Entry Risk Assessment

The Artemis missions use a skip-entry profile to accomplish a recovery near the western US coastline, however, the service module debris must still be disposed of safely. For certain contingency return scenarios, the expected dispersed entry profile is biased from the well-analyzed corridor. A novel method is presented for assessing the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of these biased results to ensure they do not contribute additional probabilistic risk to the public. More specifically, the weight of the flight path angle dispersion "tail" of the CDF needs to remain below the well-assessed region. The details of how this method was actually used to screen and plan entry profiles for specific launch windows during the Artemis I mission are shown. This method has potential applicability in other problems where a biased distribution needs to be assessed against a well-defined "core" region.

Reentry↗