Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Greg Schuster

Publications and source records attributed to Greg Schuster.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

Where Dust Comes from: Global Assessment of Dust Source Attributions with AeroCom Models

The source of dust in the global atmosphere is an important factor to better understand the role of dust aerosols in the climate system. However, it is a difficult task to attribute the airborne dust over the remote land and ocean regions to their origins since dust from various sources are mixed during long-range transport. Recently, a multi-model experiment, namely the AeroCom-III Dust Source Attribution (DUSA), has been conducted to estimate the relative contribution of dust in various locations from different sources with tagged simulations from seven participating global models. The BASE run and a series of runs with nine tagged regions were made to estimate the contribution of dust emitted in East- and West-Africa, Middle East, Central- and East-Asia, North America, the Southern Hemisphere, and the prominent dust hot spots of the Bodélé and Taklimakan Deserts. The models generally agree in large scale mean dust distributions, however models show large diversity in dust source attribution. The inter-model differences are significant with the global model dust diversity in 30%–50%, but the differences in regional and seasonal scales are even larger. The multi-model analysis estimates that North Africa contributes 60% of global atmospheric dust loading, followed by Middle East and Central Asia sources (24%). Southern hemispheric sources account for 10% of global dust loading, however it contributes more than 70% of dust over the Southern Hemisphere. The study provides quantitative estimates of the impact of dust emitted from different source regions on the globe and various receptor regions including remote land, ocean, and the polar regions synthesized from the seven models.

Dust source attribution, Aerosol, Model↗
NASA NTRS2011

TPSAS-NF1676L-13040-DND

We examine the feasibility of using airborne lidar data to: 1) infer CRC Convair-580 profiles of submicrometer fraction (SMF) over land (which is the fraction of aerosols with diameters less than 1 micrometer and is closely related to FMF) and 2) provide a proxy for CCN. If these initial Aerosol Extinction Aerosol Effective Radius feasibility studies prove successful, we will then apply these methodologies in subsequent studies to examine the feasibility of using CALIPSO data in a similar manner. We use data acquired by the NASA Langley Research Center airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL) during several recent field missions conducted by NASA, the Department of Energy, and NOAA. The airborne HSRL, which has acquired over 300 hours of data coincident with CALIPSO overpasses, measures aerosol extinction (532 nm), backscatter (532 and 1064 nm), and depolarization (532 and 1064 nm) profiles and thereby provides a dataset directly applicable to the CALIPSO measurements. During several of these field campaigns, airborne in situ measurements were acquired simultaneously within the HSRL “curtains” thereby facilitating direct correlations of the lidar observables to in situ measurements of particle size and composition, including SMF and CCN concentration. Previous studies have used simultaneous in situ measurements of SMF and Angström exponents derived from in situ scattering (Anderson et al., 2005) and remote sensing extinction (Redemann et al. 2009) measurements to build empirical relationships between these parameters. We adopt a similar approach and investigate relationships between the lidar observables, such as backscatter and extinction Angström exponents, with the coincident airborne in situ measurements of SMF and CCN concentration.

Richard Ferrare↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

TPSAS-NF1676L-19067-DND

We discuss methods to separate absorbing carbonaceous aerosols and dust in the AERONET database, including using the imaginary refractive index and the absorbing Angstrom exponent (AAE). Carbonaceous aerosols can be separated from dust in imaginary refractive index space because 95% of biomass burning aerosols have imaginary indices greater than 0.0042 at the 675--1020 nm wavelengths, and 95% of dust has imaginary refractive indices of less than 0.0042 at the 675--1020 nm wavelengths. Alternatively, about 25% of the AAE histogram for "pure dust" overlaps with 75% of the biomass burning AAE histogram, and unique identification of carbonaceous and dust species through AAE analysis is not possible for data in the overlap region.

Greg Schuster↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Models, In situ, and Remote Sensing of Aerosols (MIRA)

There is a natural partitioning of scientific interest amongst three specialties of aerosol re-search: modeling, in situ measurements, and remote sensing. The broader aerosol community benefits when these groups interact, and this strengthens overall scientific impact on climate and air quality research and predictions. The new MIRA working group establishes a forum for identifying collaborations and improving discussions amongst specialties and across regional boundaries. One area of keen interest is uniting satellite and ground-based lidar groups with other aerosol disciplines. Elastic backscatter lidars depend upon a priori knowledge of aerosol properties to convert measured lidar profiles into aerosol extinction profiles. Acquiring additional insight on aerosol properties and transport is highly valuable to these lidar groups to improve the data quality and aid in their scientific interpretation. Another area of interest is to facilitate the incorporation of measurements into global aerosol models. Modelers need aerosol optical look-up tables that enable quick conversions of hydrated (and dry) polydisperse size distributions into aerosol optical properties (extinction, scattering, etc.), but many of the existing tables are based upon outdated measurements. Thus, MIRA is building the Tables of Aerosol Optics (TAO), which is a community collection of aerosol optical calculations. This expands on the historical efforts of Shettle and Fenn, d’Almeida, GADS, OPAC, etc., except that TAO seeks continual input from the community. Thus, as aerosol measurement and computational techniques advance, so does the TAO collective. Since TAO is a community collective, it is expected that users will optionally upload computations for aerosol type as well as computations for all of the traditional aerosol species(like amm sulfate, amm nitrate, organics, etc.). The near-term purpose of the MIRA working group is to: *Characterize regional aerosol lidar ratios to support improvements of aerosol extinction profiles and understanding of aerosol typing. *Create TAO --a community cooperative of aerosol optical tables. *Facilitate international communications between aerosol measurement and modeling groups. *Encourage the use of regional knowledge to develop and improve remote sensing techniques for current and future backscatter lidars located in space. *Enable and foster communication between the scientists who run global aerosol models and scientists who analyze space-based lidar data. We will discuss how a collaborative aerosol working group will be organized on this topic. Those who are interested in MIRA can sign up for the MIRA email listserver at https://forms.gle/qdbCnngzNJc5YJi57.

Greg Schuster↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Status and Operations at the Granite Island, Michigan (GIM) BSRN Station

In June 2018, a new surface radiation site was established on Granite Island, Michigan (GIM), located in Lake Superior. GIM is a 0.1 square km (2.5 acre) rock island. GIM moved from candidate to active and became a fully-fledged member of the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) in July 2020 (BSRN Label: GIM). The installation is solar powered, and autonomous instrument functions are accessed remotely from Hampton, Virginia, USA. The original motivation to establishing surface radiation measurements at GIM was to combine high quality downwelling shortwave and longwave measurements with existing evaporation measurements that could lead to improved understanding of the Earth’s energy budget. Other scientific benefits are the addition of a new "water" site to the BSRN network (Water sites are rare in the BSRN network) and a surface validation site for satellite measurements such as the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES). In this poster, we present the status of GIM. GIM is equipped with standard downwelling flux at visible and infrared wavelengths as required by the BSRN network. Basic meteorological parameters are being monitored, as well as other data collections for aerosol and total column water vapor, PAR, and lake skin temperature. Lastly, the capabilities to clean shortwave optics remotely will be discussed and a current list of instruments and pictures will be displayed.

Bryan Fabbri↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Measuring Upwelling Longwave in the Presence of an Obstruction

One of the key measurements from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) satellite is Earth emitted or longwave (LW) radiation. The Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) aims to provide upwelling LW observations of the best possible quality across all their measurement sites. The disestablished CERES Ocean Validation Experiment (COVE), located at Chesapeake Light Station, approximately 25 kilometers east of Virginia Beach, Virginia (coordinates: 36.90N, 75.71W) was a validation site for CERES measurements and part of the BSRN network. One of the measurements at COVE was upwelling LW radiation made with an Eppley pyrgeometer. However, this measurement was complicated due to the Light Station tower being in its field of view. According to our estimates, the Light Station tower altered 15% of the upwelling LW radiation. To resolve this issue, we obtain a different upwelling longwave value using data from an infrared radiation thermometer (IRT), a pyrgeometer that measures downwelling longwave, and meteorological data. Using an IRT allows conversion from sea surface temperature to a water emission value, the downwelling pyrgeometer provides the reflected flux of the downward longwave radiation, and the meteorological data accounts for the air affects between the ocean surface and the upwelling LW measurement height. Comparing the upwelling LW pyrgeometer value with the newly derived value shows the unwanted consequence of the tower. The tower appears to enhance the upwelling LW signal during the summer, most obvious on a summer clear day, but depresses the upwelling signal, even more, during winter sky conditions (both clear and overcast). The tower affects the upwelling LW measurement in these scenarios up to 5% (20 W/m^2) when compared to the newly derived value. BSRN target uncertainty is 2%. Installing a pyrgeometer to measure upwelling LW without obstructions may not be possible at some measurement sties. This issue can be mitigated using other measurements to derive an upwelling LW value.

Bryan Fabbri↗