Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Griffith, George

Publications and source records attributed to Griffith, George.

Idaho National Laboratory Integrated Multisite SSHAC Level 3: Probabilistic Volcanic Hazards Assessment

The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) resides on the eastern Snake River Plain (ESRP), part of the Snake River Plain (SRP) with a complex origin and geologic history of volcanism. Much of the Quaternary (last 2.58 million years) volcanism within 400 km of INL is genetically associated with a major thermal anomaly referred to as the Yellowstone hotspot, which is currently located more than 180 km northeast of INL. Near INL, local volcanic sources include silicic domes near its southern border, and numerous dike-fed basaltic vents of the ESRP, some of which are near or within the INL boundaries. Quantitative probabilistic assessments of screened-in volcanic hazardous phenomena for nine different facility complexes at the INL are presented for a Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC) Level 3 (SL3) study. The comprehensive, integrated multisite SSHAC study consists of a single regional Probabilistic Volcanic Hazards Assessment (PVHA) that pertains to all nine INL facility complexes, with site-specific information developed at each respective area of interest (AOI), referred to as the "INL facility AOI" (Figure ES-1). Hazard products are generated for specified INL facility AOIs for use by multiple stakeholders from different agencies in risk-informed decision-making regarding site selection, operations, and design of nuclear facilities at INL, consistent with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulatory guidance. The study also serves as the basis for future periodic safety assessments required for existing DOE facilities, such as 10-year evaluations of natural-phenomena hazards. Elements of the INL PVHA including initial characterization, screening, quantitative assessments of eruption and hazard potential, and consideration of facility needs are conducted using the three phases of the SSHAC process: evaluation, integration, and documentation. As per regulatory guidance, the SSHAC framework provided the necessary processes and procedures for the PVHA Technical Integration (TI) team, at three workshops, five formal working meetings and many TI team remote meetings, to conduct initial characterization, screen the volcanic hazards, create PVHA model inputs, exercise those models in the PVHA, consider facility-specific volcanic hazard needs, and perform final hazard calculations. The Participatory Peer Review Panel (PPRP) provided independent oversight and performed process and technical reviews of the PVHA throughout its duration. The study included an extensive New Data Collection and Analyses (NDCA) program developed by the PVHA TI team to reduce uncertainties in hazard-significant elements in the PVHA model. NDCA activities generated 20 reports providing important contributory datasets and results to the project database for characterizing the ESRP. For example, a report compiling the dimensions of ESRP shield volcanoes and lava fields was used to construct volcanic footprints (areas of impact), was compared with data from INL subsurface cores, and was used to validate the results of lava-flow inundation modeling on the contemporary terrain. Another example is the acquisition of aeromagnetic data over INL and its surrounding area, with maps of buried magmatic features (e.g., subsurface volcanoes and swarms of feeder dikes) that informed the PVHA conceptual model of volcanism. The SSHAC evaluation process was used to conduct all elements of the PVHA including initial characterization and screening. Existing data and NDCA activities provided the foundation to develop the tectonomagmatic conceptual model of volcanism for the region of geographical interest in the SRP and Yellowstone hotspot volcanic system, and for considering volcanoes in the western US. Considering Quaternary volcanic sources active during this period, the screening approach identified and evaluated magma compositions, types of eruptive and intrusive phenomena, types of hazardous phenomena, and proximity of sources to INL. The PVHA TI team evaluated 18 types of magmatic sources in terms of 20 potentially hazardous phenomena, resulting in 360 screening decisions. The screening process resulted in 140 screened-in hazardous volcanic phenomena for Quaternary volcanic sources 1) proximal to INL facility complexes in the ESRP (64 basaltic and 54 silicic), 2) regional sources associated with the Yellowstone caldera system and Blackfoot Reservoir volcanic field (7), and 3) more distal sources from thirteen Cascade volcanoes and two volcanoes at Long Valley caldera (CA).

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

Evaluation of Sites for Advanced Reactor Demonstrations at Idaho National Laboratory

The purpose of this siting evaluation is to identify a list of candidate site locations or areas within INL boundaries for onsite demonstration of advanced reactors. A comparison of suitable advanced reactor sites is provided and includes evaluation of existing buildings, previously developed sites, and undeveloped sites across the INL Site.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Preliminary AMAFT Commercialization Strategy

The Additive Manufacturing as an Alternative Fabrication Technique (AMAFT) for nuclear fuel (AMAFT) technology is being developed by Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and Westinghouse Electric Company (WEC). To support the technology development and evaluate the commercialization strategy, the AMAFT project was enrolled in the 2017 fifth cohort of the Department of Energy (DOE) Energy I-Corps Project. The Energy I-Corps program is managed by the DOE National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and allows DOE researchers and industry mentors to create market pathways and customer discovery. This allows DOE investment and innovations to improve long-term U.S. energy industry competitiveness.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Lighting Studies for Fuelling Machine Deployed Visual Inspection Tool

Under subcontract to James Fisher Nuclear, Ltd., INL has been reviewing advanced vision systems for inspection of graphite in high radiation, high temperature, and high pressure environments. INL has performed calculations and proof-of-principle measurements of optics and lighting techniques to be considered for visual inspection of graphite fuel channels in AGR reactors in UK.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

INL Review of Fueling Machine Inspection Tool Development Proposal

A review of a technical proposal for James Fischer Nuclear. The document describes an inspection tool to examine the graphite moderator in an AGR reactor. The system is an optical system to look at the graphite blocks for cracks. INL reviews the document for technical value.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Advanced Reactors Thermal Energy Transport for Process Industries

The operation temperature of advanced nuclear reactors is generally higher than commercial light water reactors and thermal energy from advanced nuclear reactor can be used for various purposes such as liquid fuel production, district heating, desalination, hydrogen production, and other process heat applications, etc. Some of the major technology challenges that must be overcome before the advanced reactors could be licensed on the reactor side are qualification of next generation of nuclear fuel, materials that can withstand higher temperature, improvement in power cycle thermal efficiency by going to combined cycles, SCO2 cycles, successful demonstration of advanced compact heat exchangers in the prototypical conditions, and from the process side application the challenge is to transport the thermal energy from the reactor to the process plant with maximum efficiency (i.e., with minimum temperature drop). The main focus of this study is on doing a parametric study of efficient heat transport system, with different coolants (mainly, water, He, and molten salts) to determine maximum possible distance that can be achieved.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Breakthrough: Better Fiber for Better Products

Researchers at Idaho National Laboratory have developed a cost-effective method for the continuous production of alpha silicon carbide fiber. The exceptionally strong, lightweight fiber could enable significant performance improvements in many everyday products.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Report on Potential Advantages and Uncertainties of the Thorium Seed Blanket Unit Fuel Concept

Thorium is a naturally occurring radioactive element with potential application in the nuclear fuel cycle. Thorium has no fissile isotopes, meaning that unlike uranium it cannot be enriched to produce a viable nuclear fuel. Natural thorium is almost entirely comprised of the isotope 232 Th and a microscopic amount of 228 Th that is created from the radioactive decay of 232 Th. Small amounts of other thorium isotopes can be detected from the decay of uranium that often occurs with thorium in nature. During the early stages of the development of nuclear power in the United States it was believed that uranium supplies would be insufficient and that breeding would be required to fuel the envisioned nuclear infrastructure. The use of 232 Th in the nuclear fuel cycle would play a role equivalent to 238 U. Both elements are fertile and can absorb a neutron to transmute into a fissile isotope capable of sustaining a chain reaction. In the case of 238 U the fissile isotope produced is 239 Pu. 232 Th produces the less well-known fissile isotope 233 U. This report provides a brief overview of light water reactor thorium technology, and an assessment of the technology proposed by Lightbridge based on available open literature and information provided by Lightbridge Corporation. It serves to identify gaps in the current understanding of this technology, and to identify areas where further work may be required or beneficial. Analysis of the fuel cycle was not included in the scope of this report. Based on the data available and the scope of this assessment, this document cannot draw definitive conclusions about this particular technology, and should not be understood to be comprehensive or to make a recommendation, either positive or negative, on the suitability of this fuel cycle for commercial use.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program Integrated Program Plan

Nuclear power has safely, reliably, and economically contributed almost 20% of electrical generation in the United States over the past two decades. It remains the single largest contributor (more than 70%) of non-greenhouse-gas-emitting electric power generation in the United States. Domestic demand for electrical energy is expected to experience a 31% growth from 2009 to 2035. At the same time, most of the currently operating nuclear power plants will begin reaching the end of their initial 20-year extension to their original 40-year operating license for a total of 60 years of operation. Figure E-1 shows projected nuclear energy contribution to the domestic generating capacity. If current operating nuclear power plants do not operate beyond 60 years, the total fraction of generated electrical energy from nuclear power will begin to decline - even with the expected addition of new nuclear generating capacity. The oldest commercial plants in the United States reached their 40th anniversary in 2009. The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy's Research and Development Roadmap (Nuclear Energy Roadmap) organizes its activities around four objectives that ensure nuclear energy remains a compelling and viable energy option for the United States. The four objectives are as follows: (1) develop technologies and other solutions that can improve the reliability, sustain the safety, and extend the life of the current reactors; (2) develop improvements in the affordability of new reactors to enable nuclear energy to help meet the Administration's energy security and climate change goals; (3) develop sustainable nuclear fuel cycles; and (4) understand and minimize the risks of nuclear proliferation and terrorism. The Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program is the primary programmatic activity that addresses Objective 1. This document summarizes the LWRS Program's plans.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗