Search NASAβŒ• Search

Engineering topics

H. T. Huynh

Publications and source records attributed to H. T. Huynh.

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2021

Comparing Commercial and Research Computational Fluid Dynamic Codes Using High-Order Workshop Benchmark Problems

The commercial computational fluid dynamic (CFD) code ANSYS Fluent and multiple research CFD codes (ez4d with uses the conservation element and solution element (CESE) method and codes that use the flux reconstruction (FR) method) were tested using three different benchmark problems from the International Workshop for High-Order CFD Methods. The benchmark problems included the transonic Ringleb flow, vortex transport by uniform flow, and laminar boundary layer on a flat plate. Simulation results from all three benchmark problems showed that the Fluent solutions had less error than the ez4d solutions for a given degree of freedom. As expected, both the Fluent and ez4d solutions had larger errors for a given degree of freedom than the simulations that used the FR method because both Fluent and ez4d utilized a second-order scheme whereas the FR codes utilized a fourth-order scheme.

CFD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Discontinuous Galerkin and Related Methods for ODE

A defining feature of the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method for ODE is that the piecewise polynomial solution can have a jump discontinuity at the beginning of each step. Starting from the standard integral formulation, the DG method is derived here in differential form. The key ingredient is a polynomial called the correction function, which helps β€˜correct’ the discontinuous solution by approximating the jump and yields a continuous one. Under the right Radau quadrature, this continuous solution is identical to the solutions by the right Radau collocation and the continuous Galerkin (CG) methods. Next, the correction function facilitates the construction of the associated implicit Runge-Kutta schemes (IRK-DG). Different quadratures for DG result in different IRK-DG methods: left Radau quadrature in Radau IA, right Radau quadrature in Radau IIA or right Radau collocation, and Gauss quadrature in a method called DG-Gauss. The construction of IRK-DG clarifies the meaning and facilitates the proofs of various 𝐡(𝑝), 𝐢(πœ‚), and 𝐷(𝜁) conditions for accuracy. The two consequences of these conditions are that all 𝑠-stage IRK-DG methods are accurate to order 2𝑠 βˆ’ 1, and the IRK-DG methods of Radau type are unique. Numerical examples showing the behavior of the DG solutions are provided. In all, the correction function plays a key role and helps establish the relations among the DG, IRK-DG, collocation, and CG schemes.

numerical methods↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Discontinuous Galerkin and Related Methods for ODE

Starting from the standard integral formulation, the DG method is derived here in differential form. The key ingredient is a polynomial called the correction function, which helps β€˜correct’ the discontinuous solution by approximating the jump and yields a continuous one. Under the right Radau quadrature, this continuous solution is identical to the solutions by the right Radau collocation and the continuous Galerkin (CG) methods. Next, the correction function facilitates the construction of the associated implicit Runge-Kutta schemes (IRK-DG). Different quadratures for DG result in different IRK-DG methods: left Radau quadrature in Radau IA, right Radau quadrature in Radau IIA or right Radau collocation, and Gauss quadrature in a method called DG-Gauss. The construction of IRK-DG clarifies the meaning and facilitates the proofs of various 𝐡(𝑝), 𝐢(πœ‚), and 𝐷(𝜁) conditions for accuracy. The two consequences of these conditions are that all 𝑠-stage IRK-DG methods are accurate to order 2π‘ βˆ’ 1, and the IRK-DG methods of Radau type are unique. Numerical examples showing the behavior of the DG solutions are provided. In all, the correction function plays a key role and helps establish the relations among the DG, IRK DG, collocation, and CG methods.

Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equati↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Shock Capturing via Limiting for High-Order Methods including Discontinuous Galerkin

High-order methods, such as discontinuous Galerkin (DG), spectral, and flux reconstruction (FR), are prone to generating unwanted oscillations near shocks and discontinuities. Conventional limiting techniques, while effective in suppressing oscillations near shocks, often compromise accuracy near extrema, where the solution is only first-order accurate. This paper introduces a novel limiting technique for these high-order schemes, aimed at effectively managing shocks while preserving accuracy. The key idea is to expand the standard monotonicity limits to provide β€œroom” near smooth extrema, ensuring that limiting has no effect and thus preserving accuracy. Near a discontinuity, these expanded limits effectively reduce to the original monotonicity limits, suppressing oscillations. Additional motivation is drawn from a formula for the derivative of Radau polynomials, which depicts the behavior of oscillations resulting from discontinuities. This behavior leads to a simplification by applying the limits to the sum of magnitudes of all modes, linear and higher degree. Unlike typical approaches, which rely on successful detection to activate limiting, our limiter depends continuously on the data, there by avoiding potential issues if detection fails. To reduce computing time, efficient criteria for detecting smooth regions where limiting is unnecessary are presented. Combined with detection, the continuous dependence on the data is lost, but the method is more economical. A notable characteristic of the entire process is its simplicity in both concept and implementation. Numerical tests for advection and Euler equations are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

numerical methods↗