Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Harden, Troy

Publications and source records attributed to Harden, Troy.

Augmented Reality for Managing Nuclear Infrastructure and Operations - 19605

Emerging augmented reality tools offer great promise for helping manage nuclear infrastructure throughout its life cycle. These tools have the ability to provide operators with actionable holographic information as they work. Perhaps more excitingly these tools also feature sensors that provide the ability to document work at very high spatial resolution. These sensors include onboard cameras as well as active infrared sensors that can capture 3D geometry information on-the-fly. Coupling the visualization and sensing tools provided by augmented reality headsets with computational intelligence opens up many exciting new possibilities for managing nuclear infrastructure throughout its life cycle. In this presentation we show a number of examples of how augmented reality tools can be incorporated into the management of nuclear infrastructure. We show examples of using augmented reality as a human-machine interface for robotic control, and we show examples of augmented reality being interfaced with external sensors. Finally, we show how these sensing and visualization capabilities of augmented reality can be interfaced with intelligent algorithms to help operators perform their work in nuclear facilities. The goal of the work is to spark discussions on how emerging augmented reality tools can help enable the next generation of efficient, high-performance nuclear infrastructure. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Improved Performance of Asymptotically Optimal Rapidly Exploring Random Trees

Three algorithms that improve the performance of the asymptotically optimal Rapidly exploring Random Tree (RRT*) are presented here. First, we introduce the Goal Tree (GT) algorithm for motion planning in dynamic environments where unexpected obstacles appear sporadically. The GT reuses the previous RRT* by pruning the affected area and then extending the tree by drawing samples from a shadow set. The shadow is the subset of the free configuration space containing all configurations that have geodesics ending at the goal and are in conflict with the new obstacle. Smaller, well defined, sampling regions are considered for Euclidean metric spaces and Dubins' vehicles. Next, the Focused-Refinement (FR) algorithm, which samples with some probability around the first path found by an RRT*, is defined. The third improvement is the Grandparent-Connection (GP) algorithm, which attempts to connect an added vertex directly to its grandparent vertex instead of parent. The GT and GP algorithms are both proven to be asymptotically optimal. Finally, the three algorithms are simulated and compared for a Euclidean metric robot, a Dubins' vehicle, and a seven degrees-of-freedom manipulator.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Augmented Reality Tools for Nuclear Facilities - 18318

In this work we explore the possibility of improving nuclear facility operations through the use of emerging augmented reality technology. Specifically we focus on the use of augmented reality headsets. Augmented reality opens up the possibility for easy, on-the-fly access to documentation related to canisters, rooms, and carts. It also can be used to help plan complicated material moves in ways that do not violate nuclear criticality safety regulations. Modern augmented reality technology can also be interacted with using gaze, gesture and voice commands, thus making it particularly attractive for facilitating the documentation of nuclear material operations and work verification. An augmented reality-based nuclear facility criticality safety system would have a number of benefits for operations in nuclear facilities. This work could be used across the DOE complex to ensure technicians in gloveboxes work safely and securely. It could greatly reduce downtime associated with administrative criticality incidents. It would be a step forward in the process of improving the quality of documentation of the work that occurs in nuclear facilities while simultaneously increasing the ease with which this documentation can be collected. The augmented reality effectively endows the glovebox technicians with a sense for administrative nuclear criticality safety and the reactivity changes caused directly by their actions. Augmented reality also has great potential for facilitating inspections of nuclear infrastructure. Examples of Augmented Reality applications that facilitate infrastructure inspection and work verification will also be presented. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Panel reports session

This section brings together the reports of the 31 panel sessions listed below: - Avoiding the Human Capital Cliff in the DOE (PS22); - Implementing Technically-Based Cleanup; US DOE Balancing Regulatory and Fiscal Complexity (PS24); - United Kingdom - Remediation of Sellafield Legacy Ponds and Silos (PS25); - Aligning Decision-Making to Deliver Timely Results in Large Clean-up Programs (PS38); - Transition to Government Owned-Contractor Operated Site at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (PS39); - Emerging Middle East Nuclear States' Status and Plans (PS40); - NPP Panel on Waste Management (PS41); - Robotics - International Innovations in Robotic Decommissioning Technology (PS43); - Fukushima Panel (1/2): Japan Fukushima Daiichi Decommissioning Update (PS54); - Fukushima Panel (2/2): Update on the Revitalization of Fukushima and the Surrounding Area (PS55); - US DOE LLW On-Site Disposal: LLW Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Review Process (PS56); - Challenges in DOE HLW Tank Management: Facility Start-up and Waste Disposition (PS57); - Waste Management Planning for Utility Small Modular Reactors (PS58); - US Nuclear Power Plant Waste Management - LLW Disposal Issues (PS59); - DOE-EM Robotics and Emerging Technologies Road-map (4/8) (PS60); - Graduating Students and New Scientists and Engineers - Wants and Needs - Are Companies Even Listening? (PS63); - U.S. Nuclear Robotics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (5/8) (PS74); - US DOE Mixed Waste: Proposals for Dealing with Problematic Waste Streams and Policy Changes (PS76); - Current and Emerging US NRC LLW Regulatory Topics (PS77); - Agency Perspectives (US and International) on the Use of Risk and Dose Assessment Tools (PS80); - Progress on Deep Repository Programs Around the World (PS81); - US DOE Procurement and Contracting Opportunities (PS82); - Collaboration across Borders to Deliver Cleanup and Decommissioning Challenges (PS93a); - DOE Mission Success through Application of Practices and Solutions (PS94); - Challenges in Cask Certification - International Perspectives (PS96); - Robotics: Leveraging Innovations in Science and Technology to Benefit Safety Performance (PS98); - DOE Panel: DOE EM Featured Office - Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office (PS109); - Robotics: Lessons Learned from Industrial Robotics Deployment that can be Applied to the Nuclear Field (PS110a); - Roundtable: DOE Radioactive Management - Energy Facility Contractors Group - Waste Management Working Group (EFCOG WMWG) (PS118); - Thursday Topical Session 'Management of Used Nuclear Fuel: Will the United States Reengage and Align with International Efforts' (PS124); - Remotely Operated Vehicles for Emergency, Disaster, and Operational Upset Response (PS125)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗