Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Harris, Lawanna.
NASA's NanoLaunch effort will provide the framework to mature both Earth-to-orbit and on-orbit propulsion and avionics technologies while also providing affordable, dedicated access to low-Earth orbit for CubeSat-class payloads. The project will also serve as an early career personnel training opportunity with mentors to gain hands-on project experience.
A proposed fully internal compression geometry for rocket based combined cycle (RBCC) engine, STEPER (Space Transportation Engine Prototype for Engineering Research), was investigated numerically in this paper. The Steper-engine has been designed to power a reusable launch vehicle that may take-off horizontally, accelerate to Mach 2, sustain supersonic air-breathing combustion to Mach 10 while ascending to 50 km and then transition to full rocket propulsion to enter low earth orbit. The proposed engine geometry replaces the alternative conical center-body and supporting struts with a quasi-stationary upper and lower compression ramps. A cluster of thruster nozzles was embedded inside the ramp and provide thrust to the engine with additional fuel existing at the nozzle exit. The proposed geometry eases the problem of cooling hard to reach cavities. This design geometry was investigated numerically. Both perfect gas and finite rate chemistry analysis were performed. Results indicated that the emanating oblique shock waves produced by the upper and lower compression ramps intersect and the reflecting shocks do not reach the wall of the combustor but rather downstream. This effect allows the formation of two distinct regions that can be considered the core region and the surrounding flow region. The core region has higher pressure and higher temperature than the surrounding region. Therefore providing some reduction to the thermal loads to the inner walls.
Access to space is presently limited by cost. The cost of delivering a payload to low earth orbit (LEO) is on average $10,000 per pound of payload, in the United States. Much of this cost is incurred from the operation of vehicles developed with 30-40 year old technology. The old technology and design practices have resulted in expensive hardware and intensive maintenance requirements for current launch vehicles. In order to alleviate the cost factor, the technological advances throughout the next millennium must bring affordable development and a new invigorating desire to space exploration. National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA), Department of Defense (DOD), and private industry are addressing this issue by focusing on incremental improvements in the Earth- to Orbit (ETO) costs. These improvements have investigated two different approaches: 1) make space vehicles as inexpensive as possible (i.e. Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) and Delta IV) 2) make space vehicles as reusable as airplanes so that the initial cost of investment can be recaptured (i.e. Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV), X-33, X-34, and X-37) These programs have made notable progress in new material, propulsion, structures, and avionics technologies, during the last 3-5 years. So far, these programs are targeted to reduce present costs by, as much as, five times the current cost. The year 2025 goal for continued space advancement is to have ETO costs reduced by a factor of ten (i.e., tenfold), as low as $100 - $200/lb payload. For the RLV, this goal translates into very low maintenance costs and higher expected reliability per flight must be obtained. Therefore, making higher launch rates possible. For the expendable vehicle, the cost of maintenance cost is minimal, but a greater reliability must exist to insure the payload; since, there would be no way to recover the payload if the mission was to an abort or failure. Overall the cost of vehicle, payload and operations of an expendable may be too high compared to those of the RLV.