Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Hartmann, Melvin J.

Publications and source records attributed to Hartmann, Melvin J..

Shock Losses in Transonic Compressor Blade Rows

The rather extensive study of the shock losses in transonic compressors can he summarized by the following remarks: 1. A simple flow model can be used to estimate shock losses at the design point for transonic compressor blade rows and results iii reasonable correlation of loss data. It is indicated that shock losses can constitute a sizable portion of the total losses in it transonic compressor rotor. This includes all blade elements at which sonic or higher relative velocities are obtained. 2. Shock losses can he shown to exist across the blade passage (free-stream loss) and by the method of superposition with the blade profile losses result in an estimated design total loss coefficient. 3. The shock configuration was experimentally determined by the rapid pressure rise between the blades as measured by the use of barium titanate crystals. At the minimum loss operating conditions the shock is very similar to that assumed in the simple How model. 4. Shock losses obtained from a more detailed flow model were compared with the losses obtained by the simple flow model. Measured loss distribution from blade to blade closely approaches the analytical shock loss distribution. The measured distribution shows the effect of a shock boundary layer interaction. 5. The analytical method (from the detailed flow model) of determining the shock location ahead of the blade seems to apply reasonably well over a range of incidence angles. The analytical shock losses do not vary a great deal with blade element incidence angles.

Miller, Genevieve R.↗

Performance of Axial-Flow Supersonic Compressor of the XJ55-FF-1 Turbojet Engine. IV - Analysis of Compressor Operation over a Range of Equivalent Tip Speeds from 801 to 1614 Feet Per Second

An investigation was conducted to determine the performance characteristics of the axial-flow supersonic compressor of the XJ55-FF-1 turbojet engine. An analysis of the performance of the rotor was made based on detailed flow measurements behind the rotor. The compressor apparently did not obtain the design normal-shock configuration in this investigation. A large redistribution of mass occurred toward the root of the rotor over the entire speed range; this condition was so acute at design speed that the tip sections were completely inoperative. The passage pressure recovery at maximum pressure ratio at 1614 feet per second varied from a maximum of 0.81 near the root to 0.53 near the tip, which indicated very poor efficiency of the flow process through the rotor. The results, however, indicated that the desired supersonic operation may be obtained by decreasing the effective contraction ratio of the rotor blade passage.

Graham, Robert C.↗

Performance of Axial-Flow Supersonic Compressor on XJ-55-FF-1 Turbojet Engine. I - Preliminary Performance of Compressor: Preliminary Performance of Compressor - 1

An investigation was conducted to determine the performance characteristics of the axial-flow supersonic compressor of the XJ-55-FF-1 turbo Jet engine. The test unit consisted of a row of inlet guide vanes and a supersonic rotor; the stator vanes after the rotor were omitted. The maximum pressure ratio produced in the single stage was 2.28 at an equivalent tip speed or 1814 feet per second with an adiabatic efficiency of approximately 0.61, equivalent weight flow of 13.4 pounds per second. The maximum efficiency of 0.79 was obtained at an equivalent tip speed of 801 feet per second.

Hartmann, Melvin J.↗

Performance of Axial-Flow Supersonic Compressor of XJ55-FF-1 Turbojet Engine: Over-All Performance of Compressor - III

An investigation was conducted to determine the performance characteristics of the rotor and inlet guide vanes used in the axial-flow supersonic compressor of the XJ55-FF-1 turbojet engine. Outlet stators used in the engine were omitted to facilitate study of the supersonic rotor. The extent of the deviation from design performance indicates that the design-shock configuration was not obtained. A maximum pressure ratio of 2.26 was obtained at an equivalent tip speed of 1614 feet per second and an adiabatic efficiency of 0.61. The maximum efficiency obtained was 0.79 at an equivalent tip speed of 801 feet per second and a pressure ratio of 1.29. The performance obtained was considerably below design performance. The effective aerodynamic forces encountered appeared to be large enough to cause considerable damage to the thin aluminum leading edges of the rotor blades.

Hartmann, Melvin J.↗