Qualitative differences between Shuttle on-orbit and transition control
Previously cited in issue 19, p. 2997, Accession no. A82-38971
Hattis, P. D.↗
Engineering topics
Hattis, P. D.
Publications and source records attributed to Hattis, P. D..
A frequency domain stability analysis of a phase plane control system
A describing function is used to model a phase plane controller which is part of the Space Shuttle on-orbit Reaction Control System autopilot. A frequency domain stability analysis of the closed-loop control system is applied to a study of potential flight control system interaction with the Orbiter and a class of payloads deployed from a tilt table. Phase-gain plot techniques are used to show that expansion of phase plane angular rate limits and stiffening of the tilt table pivot do not always enhance system stability. Instability region approximations are mapped as a function of rate limit, payload geometry, jet used, and natural frequency of the pivot. Comparison of the describing function analysis with simulation results shows excellent correlation.
Hattis, P. D.↗
Control issues during Shuttle resupply of liquids on-orbit
Space Shuttle on-orbit servicing missions will involve the transferring betwen vehicles of such fluids as water and liquid hydrogen, liquid oxygen, hydrazine, and nitrogen tetroxide propellants. Attention is given to the novel microgravity conditions in which attitude control jet firings will affect fluid orientation and motion during transfer. Simple equations are presented which may be used to estimate control system constraints on thruster activity for the case of capillarry acquisition fluid transfer systems.
Voss, J. E.↗
Space flight experience with the Shuttle Orbiter control system
Experience gained through the Shuttle Orbital Flight Test program has matured the engineering understanding of the Shuttle on-orbit control system. The geneology of the control systems (called digital autopilots, or DAPs, and used by the Shuttle for on-orbit operations) is reviewed, the flight experience gained during the flight test program is examined within the context of preflight analysis and test results, and issues for the operational phase of the Shuttle, including constraints upon both operations and analysis still required to increase confidence in the Shuttle's ability to handle capabilities not experienced during the flight test program are addressed. Two orbital autopilots have resulted from computer memory and time constraints on a flight control system, with many different, flight phase unique requirements. The transition DAP, used for insertion and deorbit, has more active sensors and redundancy but a less complex data processing scheme excluding state estimation with fewer choices of operational mode.
Cox, K. J.↗
Qualitative differences between on-orbit and transition RCS control
Two separate reaction control system (RCS) digital autopilots (DAPs) evolved from one original Space Shuttle orbital autopilot concept. A computer overload forced this evolution. Part of the overload problem was due to unique performance requirements imposed on the RCS controller during each of several different flight regimes. The two resultant RCS DAPs yield different effector responses because they rely on different sources of sensory input and they process data differently. This paper describes the evolution of the two RCS controllers and illustrates their behavioral differences. The transition autopilot, used in orbital insertion and deorbit, is sensitive to orbiter flexure due to its feedthrough character. The on-orbit autopilot is sensitive to transient rate control degradation from large disturbances due to feed-forward rate estimation. Simulation results and flight data are used to illustrate performance differences between the two autopilots under various conditions. These include computer failures where electronic stringing and procedural reconfiguration differences affect autopilot behavior.
Hattis, P. D.↗
Optimal air-breathing launch vehicle design
A generalized two-point boundary problem methodology, similar to techniques used in deterministic optimal control studies, is applied to the design and flight analysis of a two-stage air-breathing launch vehicle. Simultaneous consideration is given to configuration and trajectory by treating geometry, dynamic discontinuities, and time-dependent flight variables all as controls to be optimized with respect to a single mathematical performance measure. While minimizing fuel consumption, inequality constraints are applied to dynamic pressure and specific force. The optimal system fuel consumption and staging Mach number are found to vary little with changes in the inequality constraints due to substantial geometry and trajectory adjustments. Staging, from an air-breathing first stage to a rocket-powered second stage, consistently occurs near Mach 3.5. The dynamic pressure bound has its most pronounced effects on vehicle geometry, particularly the air-breathing propulsion inlet area, and on the first-stage altitude profile. The specific force has its greatest influence on the second-stage thrust history.
Hattis, P. D.↗