Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Hayes, Steven L.

Publications and source records attributed to Hayes, Steven L..

A Design and Fabrication Options Trade Study for Metallic Fuel without Internal Sodium Bonding

Nuclear fuels using alloys of uranium, or metallic fuels, have many beneficial properties. The classical metallic fuel design uses a loose fitting cylindrical “slug” of fuel placed inside stainless-steel cladding tubes where the gap is filled with sodium. This sodium bond is liquid at operating temperature and conducts heat from the slug to the cladding, especially in early life before fuel swells into contact with the cladding. Despite the benefits of sodium bonding, there is a desire to develop metallic fuel technologies without it chiefly to reduce chemical reaction hazards in spent fuel storage from sodium fast reactors operating on once-through fuel cycles. Elimination of the sodium bond may also help unlock potential benefits for fuel fabrication, reactor neutronics, and compatibility with other types of reactors. Creating a sodium-free metallic fuel revolves around the problem of manufacturing fuel slug geometries which are in close contact with the cladding at beginning of life to facilitate heat transport while alleviating fuel-cladding chemical interactions (FCCI) at this interface and providing enough free volume to accommodate fuel swelling. Accelerating development and qualification of this fuel system will require careful selection of design and manufacturing options. To this end, a design trade-off study was performed to evaluate candidate options. Several design and manufacturing options were assessed, weighted, scored, and ranked with respect to fabrication, normal reactor operation, off-normal scenarios, and back-end considerations. This effort was performed both for “baseline” needs, which represented a once-through fuel cycle at temperatures and burnups known to be viable for sodium-bonded metallic fuel, and for “enhanced” needs to represent opportunities for closed fuel cycles and/or more aggressive temperatures/burnups. The outcomes of this study prioritized a baseline technology using U-Zr alloy with additives to mitigate FCCI, produced in annular slug geometry by continuous casting, clad in austenitic stainless-steel alloy, and followed by a final step to swage the cladding down to close the gap. This study prioritized an enhanced fuel technology using U-Mo alloy, also produced by continuous casting into an annular geometry, followed by coating/plating with an FCCI barrier on the slug, again with a final step to swage the cladding diameter down using oxide dispersion strengthened steel. It was noted that development of the enhanced fuel technology would entail more risk, thus U-Zr alloy was put forth as a backup to U-Mo if challenges are encountered with FCCI barriers, and advanced ferritic/martensitic steels are put forth as a backup to oxide dispersion strengthened steels if swaging and welding are found unworkable.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

FAST irradiations and initial post irradiation examinations – Part I

The Advanced Fuels Campaign Fission Accelerated Steady-state Test (FAST) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) completed its first irradiation cycle within the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). The test focused on the irradiation of alloy fuel forms for use in sodium fast reactors. Tests included the use of fuel additives (Sn, Sb, and Pd) for reducing the gettering of lanthanide fission products, zirconium liners to mitigate fuel-cladding chemical interaction, and annular fuel geometry for sodium-free fuel designs. The first cycle of FAST testing was completed and a series of rodlets were removed for the initial post irradiation examination (PIE) of FAST rodlets. The rodlet irradiation conditions was evaluated using Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) for as-run power history and COMSOL for temperature analysis. These rodlets include a set of low burnups (~2.5 % heavy metal [%FIMA]) control rodlets and a helium bonded annular rodlet (4.7 %FIMA). Initial non-destructive PIE has been completed and includes, visual inspection, neutron radiography and gamma scanning of the FAST rodlets. Radiography confirmed the integrity of the experiments as well as showing the complete filling of the annulus in the annular fuel at a modest burnup (4.7 %FIMA) and potential slumping of the cooler rodlets at lower burnup. Precision gamma scanning indicated mostly usual fission product behavior with the exception of the ceasium in the He-bonded annular fuel. Future destructive PIE will be necessary in order to fully understand the effects of accelerated irradiation on U-Zr metallic fuel behavior.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Irradiation performance of nonfertile (Pu-MA-Zr) fast reactor metal fuels

This work was part of a program begun in 2001 to develop advanced nuclear fuels, originally as carriers for plutonium and minor actinides (neptunium, curium, and americium) taken from spent commercial light-water reactors (LWR) so that the plutonium and minor actinides could be ‘burned’ or transmuted in an accelerator or a fast nuclear reactor. A central part of these experiment programs has been the development of advanced fast reactor fuels, because a fast reactor was considered the most efficient vehicle to transmute the actinide waste products, and metallic fuels is a central focus of these tests. An experiment design was developed in which a thermal test reactor, the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), was used to test small fuel pin prototypes, by creating areas in the core shielded by cadmium filters to produce a largely epithermal and fast neutron spectrum environment in which the pins could be irradiated. The results of non-fertile metallic fuel (no uranium) tests are presented here. Pu-Am-Np-Zr fuels were irradiated to fission densities up to 33 × 10 20 fission/cm 3 and Pu-239 depletions of up to 39%. The depletions were created by roughly 2/3 by fission and 1/3 by transmutation neutron capture. Up to five fuel ‘rodlets’ were irradiated in three sealed capsules stacked axially in the core, and the peak cladding temperatures ranged from 300°C to 500°C, depending on axial location as those near the core centerline are operating hotter and to higher fission densities. Several post-irradiation examinations (precision gamma scanning and fission gas release) were similar to other historical metal fuel experiments in fast reactors. However, optical metallography indicated that two of the rodlets had breached. The exact reasons are unclear. Due to the design of this irradiation experiment a rodlet breach could have increased the temperature in others in the same capsule by contaminating the thermal gap helium with heavier and less conductive fission product gases. Finally, some of those rodlets showed high amounts of fuel/cladding chemical interaction (FCCI).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Accelerating nuclear fuel development and qualification: Modeling and simulation integrated with separate-effects testing

In this work, an approach to transform and accelerate nuclear fuel development and qualification is outlined. The approach exploits advanced modeling and simulation at the outset to inform constituent and system selection and to enable integral fuel performance analyses. Analyses using these tools identify and prioritize the most important fuel performance parameters and phenomena for subsequent targeted characterization with separate-effects tests. Separate-effects testing spans out-of-pile and in-pile tests and is meant to iterate with and inform engineering-scale integral fuel performance analyses throughout the development process. Exercising this cycle in an agile fashion will increase confidence in the integral fuel performance predictions while reducing uncertainties. This process sets the stage for executing a much more limited set of well-defined integral irradiation tests designed to validate engineering-scale fuel performance codes and to confirm the performance and safety of the fuel system under prototypic conditions. This approach will reduce the time for development and qualification of a new fuel system, and it will also reduce associated costs.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Examination of Legacy Metallic Fuel Pins (U-10Zr) Tested in FFTF

The MFF series of metallic fuel (U-10wt%Zr) tests performed in the Fast Fuel Test Facility (FFTF) were the beginning tests to qualify the fuel as a driver fuel for FFTF. They all performed very well, to relatively high burnup and with no pin breaches. Tests MFF-3 and MFF-5 were chosen to be destructively examined because they were run at high peak cladding temperatures, 643 and 649°C respectively, and to modest to high burnup (138 and 101 MWd/kgM respectively). They were the only sodium fast reactor (SFR) metallic tests, with long (91.4 cm) fuel columns and clad in HT9, to be operated at these high temperatures. Extensive operating condition reconstruction was performed to accompany the examination, providing detailed operating conditions axially along the pins. In addition, detailed ORIGEN calculations provided fuel burnup along the pin length. These calculations and detailed cross-section metallography allowed a PhD dissertation to be performed where the fuel/cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) was modeled using Fickian and Soret Effect driven diffusion of rare earth fission products to the cladding surface and interact with the cladding. The examination of the MFF-3 and MFF-5 pins included neutron radiography, axial profilometry including pin bow and length measurements, precision gamma scanning, plenum gas puncturing to measure fission gas release, detailed chemical/isotopic analyses of fuel samples to confirm burnup calculations, and metallography of pin cross-sections, including micro-hardness measurements of fuel and cladding.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗