Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Heidi Fuqua Haviland

Publications and source records attributed to Heidi Fuqua Haviland.

9 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

Lunar Vehicle Active Charge Control System (LVACCS)+

The Lunar Vehicle Active Charge Control System (LVACCS) is an instrument in development that will measure the electrical potential of a spacecraft or rover under both positive and negative charge conditions, actively discharge negative charge, and charge the vehicle to a safe positive potential. All surfaces immersed in a plasma charge to non-zero potentials. In very low-density plasma (< 100 cm^-3), space vehicle charging can interfere with plasma probe measurements, degrade avionics performance, or cause a total system failure. LVACCS provides real-time in-situ space situational awareness that overcome these challenges in a small package. LVACCS has been awarded a NASA PICASSO grant to bring the instrument to technology readiness level 5. LVACCS consists of two main components: a collimated photoelectron gun (CPEG) and a Spacecraft Charge Detector (SCD).Monitoring charge build up on the lunar surface isa critical first step to understand hazards for crew, rovers, and instrumentation operating there.The LVACCS instrument will be able to fill in this gap providing robust lunar surface potential measurements and active charge dissipation.

Moon↗
NASA NTRS2023

Pmelts Modeling of the Elysium Volcanic Province

Vaucher et al. constrained the most recent volcanism in the Central Elysium Planitia south of Elysium Mons to as young as ~2 Ma, superseded by the uncovering from Horvath et al. that the Cerberus Fossae mantling unit in the southern Elysium Planitia may be the youngest volcanic deposit on Mars at a modeled age of 53 to 210 ka. Recent discovery proposed that the Elysium Volcanic Province (EVP) is sitting on top of a ~4,000 km active plume head. Following pilot work using pMELTS to model magmatic processes, this work explores the use of pMELTS in younger volcanic regions and regions with a preponderance of sulfur.

Xiao Tan↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

SelenITA: A dual-spacecraft lunar CubeSat mission to characterize the near-surface electromagnetic plasma environment

SelenITA is an international interdisciplinary mission consisting of two CubeSats that will provide the first multi-point measurement in a sustained low lunar orbit. This mission will advance the understanding of spatiotemporal differentiation of the electromagnetic space environment at the Moon in support of Artemis crew and the geosciences. The mission science objectives are to: (1) further constrain the origins of crustal magnetic fields and their applications; (2) determine the nature of plasma interactions with crustal magnetic fields; (3) characterize plasma waves and turbulence at the Moon; (4) characterize the lunar surface potential in all plasma environments; (5) constrain the composition, thermal state, and structure of the lunar upper mantle and crust; (6) characterize the ionizing radiation in lunar orbit; (7) determine the density of the dust exosphere as a function of latitude, longitude, and altitude, including the lunar polar space environment. The measurement requirements include: 3-component vector magnetic field, plasma distribution (flux, energy, density, temperature), energetic particles (protons, electrons, gamma rays), and dust. SelenITA builds on a rich history of electromagnetic plasma observations of the near lunar surface and space environment, and it answers high level science questions with state of the art instruments in a small package. PLAIN LANGUAGE ABSTRACT – SelenITA comes from the greek word for Moon, selene, with the addition of “ITA” as a reference to the Brazilian teammate, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica. In addition, in Portuguese "ita" is a prefix similar to "ite" in English, used in naming minerals, so Selenita could be seen as a lunar gemstone. In Spanish, “ita” is a diminutive suffix for “little” which is appropriate for this CubeSat mission which consists of twin 12U CubeSats in low lunar orbit. The primary science goal of the mission is to distinguish time varying features within the electromagnetic plasma environment near the surface of the Moon. The science objectives include investigating the origins of crustal magnetic fields, plasma interactions with these fields, plasma waves, surface potential, and interior properties. This mission is also interested in the radiation environment at the Moon and the amount of dust at the lunar poles. This is important because it helps us understand how future astronauts will live and work on the lunar surface and identify hazards.

space weather↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

SelenITA: A Dual-Spacecraft Lunar Cubesat Mission to Characterize the Near-Surface Electromagnetic Plasma Environment

SelenITA is an international interdisciplinary mission consisting of two CubeSats that will provide the first multi-point measurement in a sustained low lunar orbit. This mission will advance the understanding of spatiotemporal differentiation of the electromagnetic space environment at the Moon in support of Artemis crew and the geosciences. The mission science objectives are to: (1) further constrain the origins of crustal magnetic fields and their applications; (2) determine the nature of plasma interactions with crustal magnetic fields; (3) characterize plasma waves and turbulence at the Moon; (4) characterize the lunar surface potential in all plasma environments; (5) constrain the composition, thermal state, and structure of the lunar upper mantle and crust; (6) characterize the ionizing radiation in lunar orbit; (7) determine the density of the dust exosphere as a function of latitude, longitude, and altitude, including the lunar polar space environment. The measurement requirements include: 3-component vector magnetic field, plasma distribution (flux, energy, density, temperature), energetic particles (protons, electrons, gamma rays), and dust. SelenITA builds on a rich history of electromagnetic plasma observations of the near lunar surface and space environment, and it answers high level science questions with state of the art instruments in a small package.

space weather↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Future Lunar Geophysical Mission Opportunities Including the Lunar Geophysical Network, Artemis and CLPS

In the next few years, several opportunities are underway to take new geophysical observations of the Moon including geodetic and seismic. NASA’s novel Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program seeks to acquire delivery services from 14 US companies. Nine funded task orders have been selected with payloads from multiple disciplines. Here we review the upcoming geophysical CLPS payloads and their measurement objectives then we provide a review of the Lunar Geophysical Network mission in development for New Frontiers 5. The Lunar Geophysical Network (LGN) mission is proposed to land on the Moon in the early 2030’s and deploy packages at four locations to enable continuous geophysical measurements for a minimum of 6 and a goal of 10 years. Returning to the lunar surface with a long-lived geophysical network is a key next step to advance lunar and planetary science. LGN will greatly expand our primarily Apollo-based knowledge of the deep lunar interior by identifying and characterizing mantle melt layers, as well as core size and state. To meet the mission objectives, the instrument suite provides complementary seismic, geodetic, heat flow, and electromagnetic (EM) observations. We discuss the network landing site requirements and provide example sites that meet these requirements. Landing sites include the P-5 region within the Procellarum KREEP Terrane (PKT; (lat:15˚; lon:-35˚), Schickard basin (lat:-44.3˚; lon:-55.1˚), Crisium basin (lat:18.5˚; lon:61.8˚), and the farside Korolev basin (lat:-2.4˚; lon:-159.3˚) (Figure 1). Network optimization considers the best locations to observe seismic core phases, e.g., ScS and PKP. Ray path density and proximity to young fault scarps are also analyzed to provide increased opportunities for seismic observations. Geodetic constraints from laser ranging require the LGN to have at least three nearside stations at maximum limb distances. Heat flow and EM measurements should be obtained away from terrane boundaries and from magnetic anomalies at locations representative of global trends. In our recent paper, an in-depth case study is provided for Mare Crisium. We also discuss the consequences for scientific return of less-than-optimal locations or number of stations.

Moons↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Future Lunar Missions: the Need for Future Science Observations at the Lunar Surface

In the next few years, several opportunities are underway to take new science observations of the Moon. NASA’s novel Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program seeks to acquire delivery services from 14 US companies. Nine funded task orders have been selected with payloads from multiple disciplines. Here we review the upcoming geophysical CLPS payloads and their measurement objectives then we provide a review of the Lunar Geophysical Network mission in development for a future opportunity to fly to the lunar surface.

Moons↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

SelenITA: A Dual-Spacecraft Lunar CubeSat Mission to Characterize the Near-Surface Electromagnetic Plasma Environment

SelenITA is an international interdisciplinary mission consisting of two CubeSats that will provide the first multi-point measurement in a sustained low lunar orbit. This mission will advance the understanding of spatiotemporal differentiation of the electromagnetic space environment at the Moon in support of Artemis crew and the geosciences. The mission science objectives are to: (1) further constrain the origins of crustal magnetic fields and their applications; (2) determine the nature of plasma interactions with crustal magnetic fields; (3) characterize plasma waves and turbulence at the Moon; (4) characterize the lunar surface potential in all plasma environments; (5) constrain the composition, thermal state, and structure of the lunar upper mantle and crust; (6) characterize the ionizing radiation in lunar orbit; (7) determine the density of the dust exosphere as a function of latitude, longitude, and altitude, including the lunar polar space environment. The measurement requirements include: 3-component vector magnetic field, plasma distribution (flux, energy, density, temperature), energetic particles (protons, electrons, gamma rays), and dust. SelenITA builds on a rich history of electromagnetic plasma observations of the near lunar surface and space environment, and it answers high level science questions with state of the art instruments in a small package. PLAIN LANGUAGE ABSTRACT – SelenITA comes from the greek word for Moon, selene, with the addition of “ITA” as a reference to the Brazilian teammate, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica. In addition, in Portuguese "ita" is a prefix similar to "ite" in English, used in naming minerals, so Selenita could be seen as a lunar gemstone. In Spanish, “ita” is a diminutive suffix for “little” which is appropriate for this CubeSat mission which consists of twin 12U CubeSats in low lunar orbit. The primary science goal of the mission is to distinguish time varying features within the electromagnetic plasma environment near the surface of the Moon. The science objectives include investigating the origins of crustal magnetic fields, plasma interactions with these fields, plasma waves, surface potential, and interior properties. This mission is also interested in the radiation environment at the Moon and the amount of dust at the lunar poles. This is important because it helps us understand how future astronauts will live and work on the lunar surface and identify hazards.

space weather↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evolution of Martian Volcanism and Lithosphere: Geochemical Insights from Noachian to Amazonian Volcanic Terrains

The lithosphere of Mars has played a crucial role in shaping its geological features, influencing volcanic activity, climate shifts, and the planet's early habitability. Understanding the evolution of Mars' litho-sphere through different geological eons has been challenging due to weathering and resurfacing affecting the study of early Noachian volcanic chemistry. Therefore, in our study we have focused on recently discovered Noachian volcanic terranes [1-2], along with Hesperian and Amazonian volcanic terranes [3], to trace the evolution of the Martian lithosphere and thermal flux. The composition of igneous rock formed from the eruption of magma tends to preserve the record of thermal properties viz. pressure, temperature, or degree of partial melting at which it forms. Therefore, Martian volcanic provinces are of great geologic interest; they have been active throughout its history, from Noachian (>3.7 Ga) to the Late Amazonian (<500 Ma) [4]. Earlier studies focused on the evolved magmatism from Hesperian to Amazonian [4], but the type and style of Noachian-aged volcanism remain to be understood. We have investigated the geochemical compositions of Noachian volcanic provinces and compared them with relatively younger volcanic provinces on Mars using remote sensing (Mars Odyssey Gamma Ray and Neutron Spectrometer suite-GRS) and in-situ observations. Furthermore, petrologic modeling is performed to understand magmatic processes and thermal evolution. Our findings reveal distinct Pressure-Temperature (P-T) conditions across different Martian geological eras. In the Noachian terranes, we model P-T conditions ranging from 1.3-1.6 GPa and temperatures between 1350-1390°C. Conversely, the Hesperian volcanic terrane exhibits variations between 1.6-1.7 GPa and temperatures spanning 1370-1395°C. For the Amazonian volcanic terrane, P-T conditions ranged notably higher, from 1.9-2.8 GPa with temperatures between 1380-1415°C. Based on our modeling, we estimated the corresponding litho-spheric thicknesses and depths of melting for each eon. In the Noachian, the lithospheric thickness ranged from 110-135 km. Meanwhile, for the Hesperian terranes, it varied between 120-235 km, and for the Amazonian, it extended from 160-235 km. We also calculated partial melting percentages (F), observing a range of 8-12% for the Noachian, 10-11% for the Hesperian, and 10-12% for the Amazonian. Mantle potential temperatures (Tp) were calculated to illustrate variations across these geological eons. Our estimates of heat flux depicted temporal changes, showing ranges from 51-65 mW/m 2 for the Noachian, 38-45 mW/m 2 for the Hesperian, and 27-39 mW/m 2 for the Amazonian. Our study implies that the lithosphere remained consistently uniform until the Hesperian eon, indicating sustained weaker volcanic systems from mid-Noachian to Hesperian. This contrasts with fewer deep-seated plumes observed in the Amazonian era. These variations suggest potential implications for Martian climatic conditions which show a milder climate prevailed until the Hesperian, differing from Mars' current cold, arid conditions.

Mars↗