Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Herzig, Paul

Publications and source records attributed to Herzig, Paul.

Multi-Layer RF Tissue Phantoms for Mimicking a Human Core

This work presents the design recipe, fabrication process and characterization of tissue-simulating materials, configured as a physical model to mimic the electrical and some physical properties of an abdominal cavity. The complete three layer design is called the human core model (HCM). To our knowledge, presented is the first hybrid skin-muscle phantom developed to mimic the electrical properties of the intervening tissue layers of an abdominal cavity within the frequency band of 1 GHz 2 GHz, a band of interest for human body sensing due to its deep detection depth. To complete the model, a liquid blood phantom was also developed and characterized in this frequency band. The phantoms were characterized with respect to complex dielectric constant using the Agilent 85070E dielectric probe kit, and the results compared to the Gabriel model, which is used as the standard for human tissue characterization. Since the tissue impedance is an important parameter for characterizing on-body sensors and near field antenna performance, the impedance of the phantoms were also calculated and presented in the analysis.

Bonds, Quenton↗

One Dimensional Capacitive Loading in a Frequency Selective Surface for Low Profile Antenna Applications

In this paper, the impact of adding discrete capacitive loading along one dimension of a frequency selective surface for low profile antenna applications is presented for the first time. The measured data demonstrates comparable performance between a non-loaded and a capacitively-loaded FSS with a significant reduction in the number of cells and/or cell geometry size. Additionally, the provision of discrete capacitive loads reduces the FSS susceptibility to fabrication tolerances based on placement of a fixed grid capacitance. The bandwidth increased from 1.8% to 7.3% for a total antenna thickness of approx. lambda/22, and from 1.5% to 9.2% for a thickness of approx. lambda/40. The total antenna area for each case was reduced by 55% and 12%, respectively.

Cure, David↗