Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Heuser, R. E..
Potential benefits of factory-to-pad testing constitute major cost savings and increase test effectiveness. Overall flight performance will be improved. The factory-to-pad approach is compatible with space shuttle processing and the large space telescope program.
Some approaches to space-shuttle payload evaluation are examined. Issues considered include subsystem replacement in low-cost modular spacecraft (LCMS), validation of spacelab payloads, the use of standard components in shuttle-era spacecraft, effects of shuttle-induced environments on payloads, and crew safety. The LCMS is described, and goals are discussed for its evaluation program. Concepts regarding how the evaluation should proceed are considered.
Malfunction data from the thermal-vacuum tests of 39 flight-model spacecraft have been analyzed. The results are interpreted in terms of the test variables and the spacecraft performance. The malfunction data are correlated with the test time as a single variable, and also with the composite variable of time plus temperature. The improvement in spacecraft performance is examined by means of malfunction rates, malfunctions per spacecraft, and the probability of no failure related to test time. The minimum thermal-vacuum test profile required for Goddard Space Flight Center spacecraft is verified, and the probability of a defect remaining undetected is estimated.
In 1968 a study of the thermal-vacuum test results from 11 flight model spacecraft was published in NASA Technical Note TN D-4908. A major interest then was the relationship of malfunctions to their times of occurrence in test. From that study conclusions were drawn with respect to the length of time required for an adequate thermal-vacuum test of flight model spacecraft. A serious limitation on the study was the small amount of documented data available. The purpose of the present report is to update and to extend the findings of that study. The test results of 39 spacecraft, compared with the test results of 11 spacecraft used in the earlier study, now provide a better basis for the analysis. The new data were developed for analysis in the same manner as for the 1968 report, in order to facilitate comparison of the two studies. However, the larger data base made additional types of analyses worthwhile, and the present results are a significant extension of the earlier work.
Malfunction data from the thermal-vacuum tests of 39 flight-model spacecraft have been analyzed. These data are compared to the data listed in the 1968 Technical Note, NASA TN D-4908, 'Time Required for an Adequate Thermal-Vacuum Test of Flight Model Spacecraft', by A. R. Timmins. The present analyses include the relationship of malfunctions to time and temperature of the test, malfunction rates, effect of retest data, and the probability of a malfunction in each of four thermal-vacuum environments. Data are presented that relate a thermal-vacuum test profile to the risk involved using that profile. The minimum thermal-vacuum test profile is verified, and no change is recommended for the present thermal-vacuum test profile for flight model spacecraft.
Malfunction data from the thermal-vacuum tests of 39 flight-model spacecraft were analyzed. The results are interpreted in terms of the test variables, and in terms of the spacecraft performance. The malfunction data are correlated with the test time as a single variable, and also with the composite variable of time plus temperature. The improvement in spacecraft performance is examined by means of malfunction rates, malfunctions per spacecraft, and the probability of no failure related to test time. The minimum thermal-vacuum test profile required for Goddard Space Flight Center spacecraft is verified, and the probability of a defect remaining undetected is estimated.
Malfunctions and failures in first-day performance of 57 unmanned spacecraft
Application of failure flow analysis to evaluate test program of Explorer 18 satellite
Unmanned spacecraft first day failures, discussing launch environment, duration tests in simulated space and performance improvement
Voltage breakdown in spacecraft as function of pressure and electrode spacing