Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Hill, Connie M

Publications and source records attributed to Hill, Connie M.

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Calculation of Critical Heat Flux Using an Inverse Heat Transfer Method to Support TREAT Experiment Analysis

Heat transfer between cladding and coolant during transient scenarios remains a critical area of uncertainty in understanding nuclear reactor safety. To advance the understanding of transient and accident scenarios involving critical heat flux (CHF), an in-pile experiment for the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility at Idaho National Laboratory was developed. The experiment named CHF-Static Environment Rodlet Transient Test Apparatus (CHF-SERTTA), consists of a hollow borated stainless steel heater rod submerged in a static water pool which is heated via the (n, a) reaction in boron-10. This paper presents a novel inverse heat transfer method to determine CHF by using the optimization and uncertainty software DAKOTA to calibrate a RELAP5-3D model of CHF-SERTTA to temperature measurements obtained from a thermocouple welded to the surface of the rod.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

As-run physics analysis for the EPRI-3 experiment for cycles 155B and 158B

The purpose of this Engineering Calculations Analysis Report (ECAR) is to document the as-run heat generation rates (W/g), flux/fluence, radio-isotopic source term in Curies and grams, decay heat rate in Watts, and specimen DPA for the post-irradiation shipment and examination of the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)-3-1 and EPRI-3-2 experiments. EPRI-3-1 was irradiated during cycle 155B ending April 12, 2014. EPRI-3-2, a modification of EPRI-3-1, was irradiated during cycle 158B ending April 1, 2016. Source term, decay heat rate, and DPA calculations were based on scaled Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) calculated fluxes for the EPRI-3-2 experiment. Although EPRI-3-2 is a modification of EPRI-3-1, no significant changes were made in the placement of experiment specimens. Calculated fluxes were scaled using as-run center lobe source powers of the corresponding irradiation cycles for EPRI-3-1 and EPRI-3-2. ORIGEN2 Version 2.2 was used to determine the decay heat rate and source term for the EPRI-3 experiment. The source term analysis was performed as requested by the project staff. The results of this analysis may be used to demonstrate compliance with shipping requirements in the BEA Research Reactor (BRR) cask following irradiation as well as to provide as-run source term to support Post-Irradiation Examination (PIE).

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Separate-Effects Validation Experiments for Models of Fracture in Ceramic Nuclear Fuel

A number of advances have recently been made in modeling fracture initiation and propagation in ceramic light water reactor (LWR) fuel. These include the use of techniques such as peridynamics, the extended finite element method (XFEM), the discrete element method (DEM), and phase field fracture. Improved predictions of fracture in LWR fuel can benefit fuel performance simulations in a number of ways, with important implications for radial relocation, pellet-cladding mechanical interactions, and fragmentation during accident conditions. Although these modeling approaches appear promising, to-date most of their applications have been to fresh fuel. A major limitation in applying these approaches with confidence to a wider variety of conditions, such as fragmentation of high-burnup fuel, is that there is very limited data that can be directly used to validate the results of these fracture models. While fracture patterns are available from cross-sections of numerous irradiated fuel rods, the fuel rods have typically been subjected to complex irradiation histories. To validate models of fracture propagation, focused experiments that give snapshots of the initiation and propagation of fracture under well characterized prototypical reactor conditions are needed. Under a multi-institutional U.S. Department of Energy Integrated Research Project (IRP), three separate-effects validation experiments are underway to provide information on the propagation of cracks in LWR fuel under controlled conditions. The primary challenge in developing such an experiment is in providing conditions that result in a radial temperature distribution that is prototypical of LWR in-reactor conditions. Two out-of-reactor experiments are being planned that employ very different approaches to achieve such a temperature distribution. The first of these achieves this by employing a combination of inductive and resistive electrical heating to generate volumetric heating. The second experiment involves slowly heating a pellet in a metal rod to a high temperature, and then quenching that rod in a cold bath. The quenching process generates a temperature profile approximating that in an LWR fuel rod for a moment, but has a very different temperature history from the LWR. Finally, an experiment is being planned for the Idaho National Laboratory TREAT reactor that will use nuclear fission as a heat source, and which will employ a metal heat sink to replicate the thermal conditions provided by coolant in an LWR. These experiments all have their advantages and drawbacks, with varying levels of ability to reproduce actual LWR conditions and varying ability to use instruments to monitor quantities of interest over the course of the experiment that can be used to validate fracture models. For that reason, these different experimental approaches are complimentary to each other, and the combined results are expected to significantly improve confidence in the ability of computational models to simulate fracture in ceramic nuclear fuel.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

MCNP Analysis fo the Aqua-SETH Experiment in TREAT

The versatile Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility’s capability to deliver customized transient nuclear power excursions gives researchers and developers a multitude of specialized testing options. In conjunction with reactorprescribed delivery of neutron flux, experiment design requires specimen packaging to meet TREAT safety containment requirements and experimenter test objectives. These objectives may range from the very simple separate effects tests (generally dry capsule) to the more complex integral scale testing wherein prototypic boundary or specimen reactor environment conditions are created. The historic MARK-III sodium flow loop that achieved thermalhydraulic prototypic test conditions serves as an example of the more complex experiment design package.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2018

ATF Transient Prescription Tests in TREAT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Transient Reactor Test facility (TREAT) was constructed in the late 1950’s and provided thousands of transient irradiations before being placed in standby mode in 1994. In 2017, it resumed operation in order to reclaim its crucial role in nuclear-heated safety research. TREAT is a transient reactor where inherently-safe core physics, a nimble transient rod drive system, and a philosophy of continual facility improvement work together to enable flexible power maneuvers for fuel safety research. While the facility’s flexible design and multi-mission nature saw historic experiments for numerous transient types, TREAT was not specifically adapted to optimize or demonstrate its full performance capability for Light Water Reactor (LWR) postulated accidents including Hot Zero Power Reactivity Initiated Accidents (HZP-RIA) and Loss of Coolant Accidents (LOCA). The physics of HZP-RIA drive very brief pulses with fairly large energy excursions. TREAT is currently capable of approaching HZP-RIA pulse widths through transients initiated on a large step insertion of reactivity and terminated shortly thereafter by rapid re-insertion of the transient rods (“clipping”). LOCAs are postulated to occur quite differently, starting from normal power operations followed by a long period of lower power decay heat. TREAT is able to simulate LOCA events with an initial flattop transient for tens of seconds, followed by a sizeable power reduction, to a longer segment where specimen fission heating represents internal decay heat generation. Two reactor physics testing campaigns were undertaken to address the HZP-RIA type transients, neither of which had been performed in any great measure historically to address data gaps in the timing, repeatability of clipping and effect of dynamic transient rod motions on core-to-specimen fission power coupling. The first campaign, referred to as the Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) transient prescription tests, employed dosimeters in the core to characterize the effect of rod motions on specimen power coupling for clipped, unclipped, and low-level steady state operations each with approximately the same moderate core energy release. This campaign was accompanied by efforts to measure dosimetry and compare results to analytic predictions. The other HZP-RIA campaign, referred to as Narrow Pulse Width (NPW) transient prescriptions, employed higher step insertions with increased core energy release to demonstrate TREAT’s capability in achieving the narrowest-possible pulse width. Additionally, a series of LOCA transient prescriptions were also performed to demonstrate how well TREAT could perform long-duration shaped transients. Both NPW and LOCA transient prescriptions did not include dosimeters but used existing plant power instrumentation to produce transient power data. All three transient prescription campaigns were successfully carried out in TREAT. The ATF-3 transient prescriptions showed that TREAT can perform clipped transients with remarkable repeatability. Measurement and modeling both showed that the power coupling in small, fissile dosimeters does not change by more than 8% between clipped, unclipped, and steady state runs while uncertainty sources in both the modeling and measurement methods were identified and found to be on the order of 20% in total. Overall, the ATF-3 transient prescription tests were successful in determining repeatability and consistency of dosimeter power coupling, developing processes for modeling and measuring this crucial parameter, and demonstrating the need for continued efforts in transient prescription work at TREAT in support of future experiment design and post test data interpretation. The NPW and LOCA transient prescriptions were also successfully performed to exhibit TREAT’s capability for these important LWR accident categories. The NPW transients showed pulse widths of ~90 ms, which were the narrowest ever achieved in TREAT to date and relevant for the upper end range of HZP-RIA simulation. This effort provided crucial data for calibrating kinetic models to be used in enhanced pulse-narrowing strategies in upcoming irradiations. Similarly, The LOCA transient prescriptions showed that TREAT can simulate the needed nuclear heating and event time scales for LOCA fuel safety research and provided essential data for future experiment design.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗