Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Hinners, N. W..
Cost constraints to a large degree control the functionality and form of the IOC of the Space Station. Planning of Station missions must be delayed to retain flexibility, a goal also served by modular development of the Station and by multi-use laboratory modules. Early emphasis on servicing other spacecraft is recommended, as is using available Shuttle flight time for R&D on Space Station technologies and operations.
A series of recommendations constituting a core program for planetary exploration, to last from the present to the year 2000, is the outcome of a two-year study undertaken by the NASA Solar System Exploration Committee. The missions envisioned by the core program must be insulated from costly changes and delays once they are approved. The present Committee has therefore restricted its recommendations to missions which do not require novel technologies, but rather continue the techniques of the flybys, orbiters and atmospheric entry probes that have been successful in the past. Recommendations are made for exploration of the inner planets, cometary and asteroid bodies, and the outer planets. Attention is given to the identification of key elements driving mission costs. It is noted that the Space Shuttle/Centaur upper stage combination brings within reach comet and asteroid rendezvous missions that were once thought to require costly new technology.
The scientific arguments and recommendations concerning the selection of the Apollo 17 landing site are presented. The final selection was influenced by the accomplishments and circumstances of previous Apollo flights and by the proposed experiments for Apollo 17. The decisive factors in selecting the Taurus-Littrow landing area were: (1) certainty of acquiring highlands lunar samples, (2) superior orbital coverage, and (3) better use of the lunar roving vehicle capabilities.
Significant previous Apollo scientific results which influenced the selection of site for the Apollo 17 mission are reviewed. Apollo 17 assignments and equipment are characterized as an outgrowth of the preceding Apollo missions which is focused on the main problems of lunar form and origin. Details are given on the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) experiments, non-ALSEP experiments, the Lunar Seismic Profiling Experiment (LSPE), and the three periods of extravehicular activity (EVA) of Apollo 17.
High resolution panoramic photographs taken from 110 km orbits of the command service module show the lunar module structure on the moon as evidenced by reflected light and by the shadow. Before and after photographs of the landing site are presented; the increased brightness or halo is attributed to mare surface materials.
The selection is discussed of the Descartes landing site for the Apollo 16 flight for direct sampling of highland materials that would be compositionally different from previous samples. The lessons learned in this site selection that should be considered in future site selection are listed.
Apollo and Luna data related to lunar origin, evolution and processes, discussing mare basalts, interior composition, regolith, breccias, chronology, surface properties, etc
Selection of proposed lunar landing sites