Engineering topics

Holbrook, Mark R.

Publications and source records attributed to Holbrook, Mark R..

4 records

DOE OSTI2019

Current Challenges, Constraints and Recommendations for Reducing Cost of Physical Security at US Commercial Nuclear Power Plants

Economic or financial causes have led to closure or announced early retirement of several US nuclear reactors in the last five years. The published report "Economic and Market Challenges Facing the U.S. Nuclear Commercial Fleet – Cost and Revenue Study" by Idaho National Laboratory identified 63 of the 79 studied nuclear power plants (NPPs) lost money in the year 2016. The revenue gap analysis performed in the study also concluded that additional revenue is required to return most of these nuclear power units to profitable operations. This can be achieved by reducing operation and maintenance (O&M) costs that accounts for about 70% of total operating expenditures for an NPP. The Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program conducts research and development, sponsored by the US Department of Energy, that provides a technical foundation for licensing and managing the long-term safe and economical operation of current nuclear power plants, utilizing the unique capabilities of the national laboratory system. Reduction in O&M costs aligns with the LWRS program’s mission of providing science-based solutions to the nuclear industry to implement technologies and methodologies for safe, efficient, economical, and long-term operation.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2017

NRC ARDC Guidance Support Status Report

This report provides a summary that reflects the progress and status of proposed regulatory design criteria for advanced non-light water reactor (LWR) designs in accordance with the Level 3 milestone M3AT-17IN2001013 in work package AT-17IN200101. These criteria have been designated as advanced reactor design criteria (ARDC) and they provide guidance to future applicants for addressing the general design criteria (GDC) that are currently applied specifically to LWR designs. This report provides a summary of Phase 2 activities related to the various tasks associated with ARDC development and the subsequent development of ARDC regulatory guidance for sodium fast reactor (SFR) and modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) designs. Status Report Organization: Section 2 discusses the origin of the GDC and their application to LWRs. Section 3 addresses the objective of this initiative and how it benefits the advanced non-LWR reactor vendors. Section 4 discusses the scope and structure of the initiative. Section 5 provides background on the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ARDC team’s original development of the proposed ARDC that were submitted to the NRC for consideration. Section 6 provides a summary of recent ARDC Phase 2 activities. Appendices A through E document the DOE ARDC team’s public comments on various sections of the NRC’s draft regulatory guide DG–1330, “Guidance for Developing Principal Design Criteria for Non-Light Water Reactors.”

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Licensing basis event selection framework for advanced reactors - 18818

This paper describes key aspects of the risk-informed, performance-based licensing methodology as developed by the Department of Energy (DOE) for the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) project. The discussion focuses on an event selection process using modular high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) design attributes and identifies how top-level regulatory criteria can be placed on a frequency-consequence (F-C) curve. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff evaluations of the proposed approach are included. In addition, important lessons learned during the NGNP prelicensing effort and their potential applications to alternative advanced reactor designs are presented. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Cost saving opportunities in emergency planning at nuclear power plants - 18819

This paper identifies generalized offsite emergency planning costs for 2014 covering twenty different commercial nuclear plant locations in the U.S. This information was analyzed to quantify the potential cost savings associated with reduction in offsite emergency planning zone size as a function of sixteen offsite emergency planning standards contained in 10 CFR 50.47(b). Mean annual operating and maintenance costs and startup costs for a typical offsite nuclear power plant emergency planning program were $2.25 M and $10 M, respectively. However, if a reactor design technical basis were developed that allowed for a reduction in offsite plume emergency planning zone (EPZ) size from the nominal 10 mile standard currently used, collocation of that EPZ with the site plant boundary could produce programmatic savings in excess of 90% over a typical 40 year plant life. Lesser, but still potentially significant savings, are possible if the plume EPZ were resized to five and two miles. Negligible potential cost savings were identified with reductions in the ingestion pathway EPZ size which has been typically set at 50 miles. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗